CIT v. Atul Jain

299 ITR 383High Court2008#683 most cited

What is CIT v. Atul Jain authority for?

Reassessment proceedings under section 147 are not valid if the information relied upon by the Assessing Officer is vague, scanty, and lacks specific details linking it to the assessee's transactions.

147

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2010 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Atul Jain · section 147 · reassessment · vague information · scanty information · lack of nexus · bogus entries · accommodation entries · tangible material · borrowed satisfaction

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Atul Jain