CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State

200 Taxmann 220High Court2011#220 most cited

What is CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State authority for?

Interest earned by a Co-operative Society from investing fixed deposits in banks is entitled to a deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act.

348

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State · Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank · Section 80P(2)(a)(i) · deduction for co-operative society · interest from fixed deposits · bank deposits · co-operative society income · Section 80P deduction · investment income exemption · gross total income

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State

Income Tax Officers, Ward-1, Jalna, Aayakar Bhawan, Sirashwadi Road, Nr. T.V Centre vs. Mahesh Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha Limited, Swami Complex First Floor

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1229/PUN/2023[2018]Status: DisposedITAT Pune26 Mar 2024

Bench: Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryand Dr. Dipak P. Ripoteआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1229/Pun/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2018-19 The Income Tax Officer, Mahesh Nagari Ward-1, Jalna. V Sahakaripathastha Limited, S 14, Swami Complex, First Floor, Sarojinidevi Road, Jalna – 431203. Pan: Aaaam5643C Appellant / Revenue Respondent /Assessee Assessee By None. Revenue By Shri R.Y.Balawade – Addl.Cit Date Of Hearing 11/03/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 26/03/2024 आदेश/ Order Per Dr. Dipak P. Ripote, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld.Commissioner Of Income Tax Appeal[Nfac], Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Dated 26.09.2023 For A.Y.2018-19. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Revenue Are As Under : “I) On The Fact & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Allowing Deduction U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) Of The Act To The Assessee. Mahesh Nagari Sahakari Pathsanstha [R]

Section 250Section 70Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

…।आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ”ए” "ायपीठ पुणेम"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCHES “A” :: PUNE BEFORE SHRI PARTHA SARATHI CHAUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBERAND DR. DIPAK P. RIPOTE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1229/PUN/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2018-19 The Income Tax Officer, Mahesh Nagari Ward-1, Jalna. V SahakariPathastha Limited, s 14, Swami Complex, First Floor, Sarojinidevi Road, Jalna – 431203. PAN: AAAAM5643C Appellant / Revenue Respondent /Assessee Assessee by None. Revenue by Shri R.Y.Balawade – Addl.CIT Date of hearing 11/03/2024 Date of pronouncement 26/03/2024 आदेश/ ORDER PER DR. D…

M/S. Primary Agricultural Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd Guruvayanakere, Belthangady vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1, Puttur

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1008/BANG/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year : 2020-21 M/S. Primary Agricultural Credit Vs. Ito, Co-Operative Society Ltd., Ward –1, 1 ‘Jeshta’ Uppinangady Road, Puttur. Guruvayanakere, Belthangady – 574 217. Pan : Aabas 3237 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Harsha J, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Parithivel, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2024

For Appellant: Ms. Harsha J, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Parithivel, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…he question, accordingly, is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.” 9. A similar view that has been held by the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT-II, Hyderabad Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Ltd., reported in 336 ITR 516 (AP). 10. The Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. The Bharathi Co-operative Credit Society Vs. ITO in ITA No.793/Bang/2022 (order dated 28.11.2022) for Assessment Year 2015-16, following its earlier order in the case of M/s. Vasavamba Co-operative Society Ltd., Vs. The PCIT in ITA No.453/Bang/2020 (Order dated 13.08.2021), had ren…

M/S. Primary Agricultural Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd Guruvayanakere, Belthangady vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Puttur

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1007/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year : 2018-19 M/S. Primary Agricultural Credit Vs. Ito, Co-Operative Society Ltd., Ward –1, 1 ‘Jeshta’ Uppinangady Road, Puttur. Guruvayanakere, Belthangady – 574 217. Pan : Aabas 3237 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Harsha J, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Parithivel, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2024

For Appellant: Ms. Harsha J, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Parithivel, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…he question, accordingly, is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.” 9. A similar view that has been held by the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT-II, Hyderabad Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Ltd., reported in 336 ITR 516 (AP). 10. The Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. The Bharathi Co-operative Credit Society Vs. ITO in ITA No.793/Bang/2022 (order dated 28.11.2022) for Assessment Year 2015-16, following its earlier order in the case of M/s. Vasavamba Co-operative Society Ltd., Vs. The PCIT in ITA No.453/Bang/2020 (Order dated 13.08.2021), had ren…

M/S. Primary Agricultural Credit Co-Operative Society Ltd Guruvayanakere, Belthangady vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1, Puttur

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1006/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Primary Agricultural Credit Vs. Ito, Co-Operative Society Ltd., Ward –1, 1 ‘Jeshta’ Uppinangady Road, Puttur. Guruvayanakere, Belthangady – 574 217. Pan : Aabas 3237 K Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Harsha J, Advocate Revenue By : Shri. Parithivel, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2024

For Appellant: Ms. Harsha J, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Parithivel, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…accordingly, is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.” Page 7 of 8 9. A similar view that has been held by the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT-II, Hyderabad Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Ltd., reported in 336 ITR 516 (AP). 10. The Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. The Bharathi Co-operative Credit Society Vs. ITO in ITA No.793/Bang/2022 (order dated 28.11.2022) for Assessment Year 2015-16, following its earlier order in the case of M/s. Vasavamba Co-operative Society Ltd., Vs. The PCIT in ITA No.453/Bang/2020 (Order dated 13.08.2021), had ren…

M/S. Dodmane Group Gramagala Seva Sahakari Sangha Niyamita Karkimaki, Karkimakki vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Sirsi

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 751/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George Kassessment Year : 2018-19 Sri Dodmane Group Gramagala Seva Sahakari Vs. Ito, Sangha Niyamita Karkimakki, Ward – 1, 41, Siddapur-Kumta Road Karkimakki Sirsi. Tq 581 322, Karnataka. Pan : Aacad 0741 J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel For Revenue. Date Of Hearing : 21.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.11.2023

For Appellant: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel for Revenue
Section 143(2)Section 234Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…he question, accordingly, is answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee.” 9. A similar view that has been held by the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CIT-II, Hyderabad Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Cooperative Bank Ltd., reported in 336 ITR 516 (AP). 10. The Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal in the case of M/s. The Bharathi Co-operative Credit Society Vs. ITO in ITA No.793/Bang/2022 (order dated 28.11.2022) for Assessment Year 2015-16, following its earlier order in the case of M/s. Vasavamba Co-operative Society Ltd., Vs. The PCIT in ITA No.453/Bang/2020 (Order dated 13.08.2021), had ren…