CIT v. Amir Corporation 81 CCH 0069 (Guj.), CIT Mehrotra Brothem

270 ITR 157High Court2004#1088 most cited

What is CIT v. Amir Corporation 81 CCH 0069 (Guj.), CIT Mehrotra Brothem authority for?

A revision under section 263(1) is justified when the assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue due to an inadequate enquiry or non-application of mind by the assessing officer.

101

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,418 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Amir Corporation · CIT Mehrotra Brothers · section 263 · section 147 · section 148 · inadequate enquiry · lack of enquiry · erroneous and prejudicial · non-application of mind

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Amir Corporation 81 CCH 0069 (Guj.), CIT Mehrotra Brothem