CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.

319 ITR 306Supreme Court of India2009#31 most cited

What is CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. authority for?

A proviso inserted into a section to remedy unintended consequences, make the section workable, or supply an obvious omission must be read retrospectively in operation to give effect to the section as a whole.

1,344

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 383,061 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. · Alom Extrusions · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 43B · Section 2(24)(x) · retrospective amendment · proviso interpretation · unintended consequences · employee contribution PF ESI · deduction allowance

Also reported as

1 SCC 489

Sections most often in play

Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 40(a)(ia)Section 50C
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 2(24)(x)section 36(1)(va)section 43bsection 2(24)section 43section 36(1)section 36section 139(1)section 139section 143(1)section 13prescribed

Judgments citing CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.

Ikea Services India Private Ltd., Delhi vs. DCIT Circle-10(1), Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1033/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Sai Creation, Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1022/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Sai Creation, Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1021/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Tej Singh Ghangas, Panipat vs. ITO, Panipat

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1018/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Brij Gopal Construction Co. P.Ltd, Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1004/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Anjappar Chettinad Ac Restaurant, Bangalore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the both the appeals are allowed

ITA 452/BANG/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan

For Appellant: Shri. V. Padmanaban, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC - C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT ITA Nos.393 and 452/Bang/2022 Assessment Years : 2018-19 and 2019-20 M/s. Anjappar Chettinad AC ITO, Vs. Restaurant - Bangalore, Ward – 1(2)(1), 100 Ft Road, Indira Nagar, BMTC Building, Bengaluru-560 038. Bengaluru. PAN : AAZFA 0846 P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. V. Padmanaban, CA Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department. Date of hearing : 14.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 14.06.2022 O R D E R ITA No.393Bang/2022 is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated…

Anjappar Chettinad Ac Restaurant, Bangalore vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the both the appeals are allowed

ITA 393/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: PendingITAT Bangalore14 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N. V. Vasudevan

For Appellant: Shri. V. Padmanaban, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC - C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N. V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT ITA Nos.393 and 452/Bang/2022 Assessment Years : 2018-19 and 2019-20 M/s. Anjappar Chettinad AC ITO, Vs. Restaurant - Bangalore, Ward – 1(2)(1), 100 Ft Road, Indira Nagar, BMTC Building, Bengaluru-560 038. Bengaluru. PAN : AAZFA 0846 P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. V. Padmanaban, CA Revenue by : Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Standing Counsel for Department. Date of hearing : 14.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 14.06.2022 O R D E R ITA No.393Bang/2022 is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated…

Balraj, Sonepat vs. ITO, Ward-1, Sonipat

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1673/DEL/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…construction which favours the Assessee must be adopted.’ 4 Balraj Vs. ITO 6. The issue under controversy travelled upto the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Rajasthan State Beverages Ltd (2017) 84 Taxmann.com 185 (SC), CIT Vs. Alom Extrusion Ltd (2010) 1 SCC 489, CIT Vs. Vinay Cement Ltd 213 CTR 268 and the Hon’ble Apex Court clearly held the amount claimed on payment of PF and ESI if deposited on or before due date of filing of returns then the same cannot be disallowed u/s 43B or u/s 36(1)(va) of the Act. 7. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. AIMIL Ltd. (2010) 321 ITR 508 (Delhi), has he…

Balraj, Sonepat vs. ITO, Ward - 1, Sonipat

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 1672/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat

Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…construction which favours the Assessee must be adopted.’ 4 Balraj Vs. ITO 6. The issue under controversy travelled upto the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Rajasthan State Beverages Ltd (2017) 84 Taxmann.com 185 (SC), CIT Vs. Alom Extrusion Ltd (2010) 1 SCC 489, CIT Vs. Vinay Cement Ltd 213 CTR 268 and the Hon’ble Apex Court clearly held the amount claimed on payment of PF and ESI if deposited on or before due date of filing of returns then the same cannot be disallowed u/s 43B or u/s 36(1)(va) of the Act. 7. The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in case of CIT vs. AIMIL Ltd. (2010) 321 ITR 508 (Delhi), has he…

Crimsonlogic India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CPC, Bangalore

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed in above terms

ITA 228/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore08 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Ganesh K, JCIT (DR)
Section 139(1)Section 234BSection 234CSection 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 6

…ore the date of filing of the return of income under the Act. 3. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the CPC and the Ld. CIT(A) erred in not following the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court decision in case of CIT v Mom Extrusions Ltd [2009] 319 ITR 306 (SC) in this regard. 4. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. CIT(A) has grossly erred in relying on the amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 2021 to section 36(1)(va) and section 43B of the Act, without appreciating that the same were prospective in nature being effective from 01 April, 2021 and accordingly,…

M/S. Avadh Hospital and Heart Centre, Lucknow vs. DCIT-6, Lucknow-New, Lucknow

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 105/LKW/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri A. P. Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Sachan, D.R
Section 36(1)(v)

…High Court, in the case of ‘Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT’, [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has relied upon and referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd.’, [2009] 319 ITR 306. It was submitted that therefore, the additions sustained by learned CIT(A) be deleted. 5. The ld. D. R., on the other hand, placing reliance on the orders of the ld. CIT(A), has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has relied on a number of case laws for sustaining the addition. In this regard, our attention was invited to the findings of the learned C…

M/S Avadh Hospital and Heart Centre, Lucknow vs. DCIT-6, Lucknow-New

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 104/LKW/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Jun 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri A. P. Sinha, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Pankaj Sachan, D.R
Section 36(1)(v)

…High Court, in the case of ‘Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT’, [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has relied upon and referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd.’, [2009] 319 ITR 306. It was submitted that therefore, the additions sustained by learned CIT(A) be deleted. 5. The ld. D. R., on the other hand, placing reliance on the orders of the ld. CIT(A), has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has relied on a number of case laws for sustaining the addition. In this regard, our attention was invited to the findings of the learned C…

M/S Urban Coop Bank Ltd, Bareilly vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Bareilly New

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 133/LKW/2021[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow07 Jun 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri A.D Jain & Shri T.S. Kapoor

Section 139(1)Section 36Section 43B

…habad High Court in the case of Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad) has dealt with similar issue and after taking into account the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Alom Extrusion Ltd. Reported in (2009) 319 ITR 306 and after taking into account views of different High Courts, has decided the similar issue in favour of the assessee by holding as under: “16. Learned counsel for Assessee argued that the issue in question is covered by Supreme Court judgment in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Alom Extrusions Ltd., (2009) 319 ITR 306, but both learned counsels app…

M/S. Indigenous Bureau of India, Mumbai vs. CIT (A) NFAC, Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 82/MUM/2022[AY 2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 May 2022

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amarjit Singhita Nos. 81 & 82 /Mum/2022 (A.Ys. 2018-19 & 2019-20) M/S Indigenous Bureau Vs. Cit(A) Of India (Formerly Known As Nfac, Delhi Investigation Bureau Of India) 164, 3Rd Floor, Zaveri Chambers, Modi Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400001 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaafi1617H Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: N. B. GandhiFor Respondent: R.A. Dhyani
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…case of GhatgePatil Transports Ltd. (supra), the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court held that both employers and employee’s contributions are covered under amendment to section 43B and judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. [2009] 319 ITR 306/185 Taxman 416 that payment made was subject to benefit of section 43B. We have perused the decision of ITAT Bangalore in the case of Mavinahalli Shivananjappa Vijay Kumar vide ITA Nos. 596 & 597/Bang/ 2021 dated 13.12.2021 wherein it is held that explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act 2021 proposing amendment in Section 36(1)(va) as well as s…

M/S. Indigenous Bureau of India, Mumbai vs. CIT (A) NFAC, Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 81/MUM/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 May 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amarjit Singhita Nos. 81 & 82 /Mum/2022 (A.Ys. 2018-19 & 2019-20) M/S Indigenous Bureau Vs. Cit(A) Of India (Formerly Known As Nfac, Delhi Investigation Bureau Of India) 164, 3Rd Floor, Zaveri Chambers, Modi Street, Fort, Mumbai – 400001 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaafi1617H Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: N. B. GandhiFor Respondent: R.A. Dhyani
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…case of GhatgePatil Transports Ltd. (supra), the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court held that both employers and employee’s contributions are covered under amendment to section 43B and judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. [2009] 319 ITR 306/185 Taxman 416 that payment made was subject to benefit of section 43B. We have perused the decision of ITAT Bangalore in the case of Mavinahalli Shivananjappa Vijay Kumar vide ITA Nos. 596 & 597/Bang/ 2021 dated 13.12.2021 wherein it is held that explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act 2021 proposing amendment in Section 36(1)(va) as well as s…

Aditya Flexipack LLP, Kanpur vs. The Assessing Officer, Kanpur

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 95/LKW/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 May 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R
Section 36(1)(v)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…High Court, in the case of ‘Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT’, [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has relied upon and referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd.’, [2009] 319 ITR 306. It was submitted that therefore, the additions sustained by learned CIT(A) be deleted. 5. The ld. D. R., on the other hand, placing reliance on the orders of the ld. CIT(A), has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has relied on a number of case laws for sustaining the addition. In this regard, our attention was invited to the findings of the learned C…

Aditya Flexipack LLP, Kanpur vs. The Assessing Officer, Special Range, Kanpur

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 94/LKW/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 May 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R
Section 36(1)(v)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…High Court, in the case of ‘Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT’, [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has relied upon and referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd.’, [2009] 319 ITR 306. It was submitted that therefore, the additions sustained by learned CIT(A) be deleted. 5. The ld. D. R., on the other hand, placing reliance on the orders of the ld. CIT(A), has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has relied on a number of case laws for sustaining the addition. In this regard, our attention was invited to the findings of the learned C…

M/S India Pesticides Ltd, Bareilly vs. DCIT-1, Bareilly

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 5/LKW/2022[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 May 2022AY 2018-2019

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2018-19 M/S India Pesticides Ltd. V. The Dcit-1 35-A, Civil Lines Bareilly Bareilly Tan/Pan:Aaaci3591D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None (Written Submission) Respondent By: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 17 05 2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 30 05 2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.r
Section 143Section 154

…High Court, in the case of ‘Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT’, [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has relied upon and referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd.’, [2009] 319 ITR 306. It was submitted that therefore, the additions sustained by learned CIT(A) be deleted. Page 3 of 16 5. The ld. D. R., on the other hand, placing reliance on the order of the ld. CIT(A), has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has relied on a number of case laws for sustaining the addition. In this regard, our attention was invited to the findings o…

M/S Swarup Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, Bareilly vs. DCIT-1, Bareilly

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee stand allowed

ITA 4/LKW/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 May 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoor

For Appellant: None (Written submission)For Respondent: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R
Section 143(1)(a)Section 154

…High Court, in the case of ‘Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT’, [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has relied upon and referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd.’, [2009] 319 ITR 306. It was submitted that therefore, the additions sustained by learned CIT(A) be deleted. 8. The ld. D. R., on the other hand, placing reliance on the orders of the ld. CIT(A), has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has relied on a number of case laws for sustaining the addition. In Page 4 of 17 this regard, our attention was invited to the findings o…

Mr.Shitij Dhawan, Kanpur vs. The Assessing Officer, Kanpur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 36/LKW/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow30 May 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri. A. D. Jain & Shri T. S. Kapoorassessment Year: 2019-20 Mr. Shitij Dhawan V. The Assessing Officer 122/235, Fazalganj Special Range Kanpur Kanpur Tan/Pan:Acqpd3380G (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Rakesh Garg, Advocate Respondent By: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R. Date Of Hearing: 17 05 2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 30 05 2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Rakesh Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Harish Gidwani, D.R
Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…High Court, in the case of ‘Sagun Foundry (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT’, [2017] 78 taxmann.com 47 (Allahabad), wherein, the Hon'ble High Court has relied upon and referred to the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of ‘CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd.’, [2009] 319 ITR 306. It was submitted that therefore, the addition sustained by learned CIT(A) be deleted. 6. The ld. D. R., on the other hand, placing reliance on the order of the ld. CIT(A), has submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has relied on a number of case laws for sustaining the addition. In Page 4 of 17 this regard, our attention was invited to the findings of…