CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.

319 ITR 306Supreme Court of India2009#31 most cited

What is CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. authority for?

A proviso inserted into a section to remedy unintended consequences, make the section workable, or supply an obvious omission must be read retrospectively in operation to give effect to the section as a whole.

1,344

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 383,061 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. · Alom Extrusions · Section 36(1)(va) · Section 43B · Section 2(24)(x) · retrospective amendment · proviso interpretation · unintended consequences · employee contribution PF ESI · deduction allowance

Also reported as

1 SCC 489

Sections most often in play

Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 40(a)(ia)Section 50C
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 2(24)(x)section 36(1)(va)section 43bsection 2(24)section 43section 36(1)section 36section 139(1)section 139section 143(1)section 13prescribed

Judgments citing CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.

M/S Saravana Selvarathnam Trading & Manufacturing Private Limited, Chennai vs. ADIT, CPC, Benguluru

Appeal is allowed

ITA 286/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…n CIT v. Industrial Security & Intelligence India (P.) Ltd. [TCA No. 585 of 2015, dated 24-7-2015] and held as under: - 5. We find that the Tribunal has rightly relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT V. Alom Extrusions Ltd. reported in 319 ITR 306, whereby, the Supreme Court held that omission of second proviso to Section 43B and amendment to first proviso by Finance Act, 2003 are curative in nature and are effective retrospectively, i.e., with effect from 1.4.1988 i.e., the date of insertion of first proviso. The Delhi High Court in the case of CIT V. Amil Ltd. reported in 321 ITR 508 hel…

M/S Punniyamoorthy Pillai Department Store, Thanjavur vs. ITO, Circle(OSD)-1, Trichy

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 285/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jun 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Saroj Kumar Parida (Advocate)-Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2(24)(x)Section 263Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…n CIT v. Industrial Security & Intelligence India (P.) Ltd. [TCA No. 585 of 2015, dated 24-7-2015] and held as under: - 5. We find that the Tribunal has rightly relied on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of CIT V. Alom Extrusions Ltd. reported in 319 ITR 306, whereby, the Supreme Court held that omission of second proviso to Section 43B and amendment to first proviso by Finance Act, 2003 are curative in nature and are effective retrospectively, i.e., with effect from 1.4.1988 i.e., the date of insertion of first proviso. The Delhi High Court in the case of CIT V. Amil Ltd. reported in 321 ITR 508 hel…

M/S. Kalyan Gas Services, Mumbai vs. CIT (A) NFAC, Thane

ITA 2028/MUM/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri S.K. Jain, D.R
Section 1Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

…urt of Bombay in case of Ghatge Patil Transporters Ltd. (supra) held that both employees’ and employer’s contribution are covered under amendment to section 43B and covered under judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2009) 319 ITR 306 and such deduction claimed by the assessee is allowable. 10. Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in case of M/s. Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India P. Ltd. vs. ACIT (supra) also decided the identical issue in favour of the assessee by holding that the payment of employees contribution qua PF & ESIC if made before the due date of filing of return of…

Pentas Landscape Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs. ADIT CPC, Bengaluru, Thane

ITA 1955/MUM/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Shailesh Bandi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Pophare, D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…urt of Bombay in case of Ghatge Patil Transporters Ltd. (supra) held that both employees’ and employer’s contribution are covered under amendment to section 43B and covered under judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2009) 319 ITR 306 and such deduction claimed by the assessee is allowable. 10. Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in case of M/s. Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India P. Ltd. vs. ACIT (supra) also decided the identical issue in favour of the assessee by holding that the payment of employees contribution qua PF & ESIC if made before the due date of filing of return of i…

Pentas Landscape Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs. ADIT, CPC, Bangalore, Thane

ITA 1954/MUM/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2018-19 & Assessment Year: 2019-20

For Appellant: Shri Shailesh Bandi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Ashish Pophare, D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 36Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…urt of Bombay in case of Ghatge Patil Transporters Ltd. (supra) held that both employees’ and employer’s contribution are covered under amendment to section 43B and covered under judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in case of CIT vs. Alom Extrusions Ltd. (2009) 319 ITR 306 and such deduction claimed by the assessee is allowable. 10. Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal in case of M/s. Adyar Ananda Bhavan Sweets India P. Ltd. vs. ACIT (supra) also decided the identical issue in favour of the assessee by holding that the payment of employees contribution qua PF & ESIC if made before the due date of filing of return of i…

Gea Process Engineering (India) P.Ltd, Gujrat vs. ITO, Mumbai

ITA 4338/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2008-09 Dcit, M/S. Gea Process Circle- 2(2)(1), Engineering (India) Pvt. Room No.545, Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Savli Road, M.K. Road, P.O. Dumad, Mumbai - 400020 Baroda, Gujarat- 391740 Pan: Aaacl0566H (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil M. Lala, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Mishra, D.R
Section 2(24)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI BASKARAN BR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09 DCIT, M/s. Gea Process Circle- 2(2)(1), Engineering (India) Pvt. Room No.545, Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Savli Road, M.K. Road, P.O. Dumad, Mumbai - 400020 Baroda, Gujarat- 391740 PAN: AAACL0566H (Appellant) (Respondent) CO No.148/M/2015 (Arising out of ITA No.4155/M/2015) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Gea Process Income Tax Officer, Engineering (India) Pvt. JCIT- 2(2)(1), Ltd., Mumbai Savli Road, Vs. P.O. Dumad, Baroda, Gujarat- 391740 PAN: AAA…

DCIT Cir 2(2)(1), Mumbai vs. Gea Process Engineering ()I) P.Ltd, Gujrat

ITA 4155/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jun 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Baskaran Br & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year: 2008-09 Dcit, M/S. Gea Process Circle- 2(2)(1), Engineering (India) Pvt. Room No.545, Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Savli Road, M.K. Road, P.O. Dumad, Mumbai - 400020 Baroda, Gujarat- 391740 Pan: Aaacl0566H (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Sunil M. Lala, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Mishra, D.R
Section 2(24)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “K”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI BASKARAN BR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2008-09 DCIT, M/s. Gea Process Circle- 2(2)(1), Engineering (India) Pvt. Room No.545, Ltd., Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Savli Road, M.K. Road, P.O. Dumad, Mumbai - 400020 Baroda, Gujarat- 391740 PAN: AAACL0566H (Appellant) (Respondent) CO No.148/M/2015 (Arising out of ITA No.4155/M/2015) Assessment Year: 2008-09 M/s. Gea Process Income Tax Officer, Engineering (India) Pvt. JCIT- 2(2)(1), Ltd., Mumbai Savli Road, Vs. P.O. Dumad, Baroda, Gujarat- 391740 PAN: AAA…

Preety Arora, Mumbai vs. ADIT (CPC), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1515/MUM/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopalpreety Arora Vs. Adit (Cpc) 96, Shanghrila Shahid Karnataka Bhagatsingh Road Colaba 560100 Maharashtra – 400005 स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No: Aadpa3141M Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Ms.Pooja Hasrajani Respondent By : Mr. R.A. Dhyani Date Of Hearing 08.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 15.06.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (Am): The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The A.O. U/S 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961, For A.Y. 2018-19. The Assessee Has Assailed The Impugned Order On The Following Grounds Before Us:

For Appellant: Ms.Pooja HasrajaniFor Respondent: Mr. R.A. Dhyani
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…case of GhatgePatil Transports Ltd. (supra), the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court held that both employers and employee’s contributions are covered under amendment to section 43B and judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd. [2009] 319 ITR 306/185 Taxman 416 that payment made was subject to benefit of section 43B. We have perused the decision of ITAT Bangalore in the case of Mavinahalli Shivananjappa Vijay Kumar vide ITA Nos. 596 & 597/Bang/ 2021 dated 13.12.2021 wherein it is held that explanatory memorandum to the Finance Act 2021 proposing amendment in Section 36(1)(va) as well as s…

Shamsons Polymers P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 991/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Shamsons Polymers P.Ltd, New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 990/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Fashion Makers Group, New Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 988/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Ravinder Kumar, G B Nagar vs. ITO, Noida

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 987/DEL/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Pooja, Ghaziabad vs. ITO, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 986/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Creative Arts Education Society, Delhi vs. JCIT, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 970/DEL/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Orm Engineering P.Ltd, Faridabad vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 950/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Yogesh Bansal, Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 915/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Bharat Bhushan, Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Circle 1(1), Gurgaon

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 899/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Vgr Engineering Services Private Limited, Haryana vs. DCIT, Circle-26(2), Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 898/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Banarsi Das, Haryana vs. ITO, Ward-1(3), Gurgaon

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 897/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…

Widmans Laboratory, Haryana vs. ITO Ward-2(3), Faridabad

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 896/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri Pradip Kumar Kediaआ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1051/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Pratham Motors Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम Suite No. 702, Nilgiri Place, 9 – Bara Khamba Road, Vs. Circle : 20 (1) New Delhi–110 001. Pan No. Aaccp4397E New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1069/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 Manoj Kumar Srivastav Income Tax Officer, बनाम 26-A, Block 7,Gokul Dham Society Lig Flats, Sector : 135, Noida, Vs. Ward : 49 (3) Gautam Buddha Nagar (U.P.) Pan No. Alnpk4727G New Delhi. िनधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By : N O N E; राज"वक"ओरसे / Department By : Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R.; A N D आ.अ.सं./ I.T.A No. 1182/Del/2022 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2019-20 Seagull Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Acit, बनाम D-3, Lajpat Nagar-1, Circle : 23 (2) New Delhi–110 024. New Delhi. Vs. Pan No. Aabcs2833D

For Appellant: N o n eFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. D. R

…igh Court in the case of CIT Vs. AIMIL Ltd. 321 ITR 508. Ratio of this decision squarely applies to the facts of the assessee’s cases. Reliance was also placed on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs. M/s. Alom Extrusions Limited (2009) 319 ITR 306 (SC). 5. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. Vs. CIT (supra) held that retrospective provision in a Tax Act which is for the removal of doubts cannot be presumed to be retrospective even where such language is used if it alters or changes the law as it earlier stood. The Hon’ble Supreme Court also observed that t…