ACIT, Circle - 2(1), Panaji vs. M/S Jay Ram Ore Carriers, Vasco
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands allowed
ITA 227/PAN/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Panaji29 Aug 2023AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Partha Sarathi Chaudhuryआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.227/Pan/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15 Acit, Circle-2(1), Panaji, Vs. M/S. Jay Ram Ore Goa. Carriers, 2Nd Floor, Sunflower Appts, Opp. St. Andrew Church, Vasco, Goa. Pan : Aaffj0752R Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri N. Shrikanth Assessee By : Shri R. D. Onkar Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 29.08.2023 आदेश / Order Per Inturi Rama Rao, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Revenue Directed Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Panaji [‘The Cit(A)’] Dated 30.03.2018 For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Briefly, The Facts Of The Case Are That The Respondent-Assessee Is A Partnership Firm Engaged In The Business Of Operation Of Barge Of Contract. The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2014-15 Was Filed By The Appellant Firm On 29.07.2014 Declaring Total Income
For Appellant: Shri R. D. OnkarFor Respondent: Shri N. Shrikanth
Section 143(3)Section 40
…ch means that the income assessed under the head “other income” cannot be considered for the purpose of computing the books profits for the purpose of section 40(b)(v) of the Act. The Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court in the case of CIT vs. Allen Career Institute, 403 ITR 375 (Rajasthan) after making a 7 reference to the decision of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Md. Serajuddin & Bros. (supra) had also taken the similar view. Even otherwise on reading of the decision of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Md. Serajuddin & Bros. (supra), the issue that had come up for consideration before the…