Penta Media Graphics Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, Chennai
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for AY 2003-04 is allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal for AY 2002-03 is dismissed
ITA 1404/CHNY/2015[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jul 2022AY 2003-04
Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.1403 & 1404/Chny/2015 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2002-03 & 2003-04 M/S. Penta Media Graphics Ltd., Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of ‘Taurus’, No. 25, First Main Road, Income Tax, Media Circle I, Room No. 311, 3Rd Floor, New Block, United India Colony Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aaacp1647B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Sree Lakshmi Valli, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Guru Bashyam, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 06.07.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.07.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Different Orders Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 14, Chennai Dated 27.03.2015 & 31.03.2015 Relevant To The Assessment Years 2002-03 & 2003-04 Respectively.
For Appellant: Sree Lakshmi Valli, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Guru Bashyam, CIT-DR
Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 263
…ought to have noted that in so far as the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax pursuant to which the impugned order has been passed is barred by limitation in view of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT Vs Alagendran Finance Ltd. (293 ITR 1), the present impugned order has no basis. (e) The Assessing Authority erred in proceeding pursuant to an invalid order in so far as the order u/s 263 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax has been passed in contravention of the ingredients of Sec.263. The present impugned order dated 15.12.2011 refers to a proposal initiated by the Assessing Au…