How many judgments cite CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd.?

171 judgments on BharatTax cite CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd. (36 Taxmann.com 289), spanning 2015 to 2026.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd. come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 10B(3), Section 10(B)(2), Section 10B(2)(a), Section 12(4), Section 133(6), Section 143(3).

CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd.

36 Taxmann.com 289High Court2013#568 most cited

What is CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd. authority for?

The Delhi High Court holds that Infosys Ltd. is not comparable to a captive software development service provider for transfer pricing analysis, given its huge turnover, high profit margins, ownership of intangible intellectual property rights, branded products, and differing risk profile.

171

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd. · Agnity India Technologies · transfer pricing · comparable companies · Infosys comparability · captive service provider · software development · intangible intellectual property rights · turnover filter · risk profile · functional comparability · associated enterprises

Also reported as

219 Taxmann 2693 DTR 375

Sections most often in play

Section 10B(3)Section 10(B)(2)Section 10B(2)(a)Section 12(4)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144B Section 144C(13)

Issues it is cited on

captive service provider working capital adjustment far analysis related party transaction comparable companies tested party transactional net margin method most appropriate method intangible assets associated enterprises section 10a tnmm

Judgments citing CIT v. Agnity India Technologies (P.) Ltd.

Mavenir Systems Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-4(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 453/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuit(Tp)A No. 453/Bang/2022 Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. Mavenir Systems Pvt. Ltd., Building Beach E1 2Nd Floor, The Deputy Manyata Embassy Business Commissioner Of Park, Income Tax, Outer Ring Road Hebbal Kr Circle – 4 (1)(1), Puram Section, Vs. Bangalore. Bengaluru – 560 045. Pan: Aaecm9663N Appellant Respondent : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Assessee By Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue By Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 05-01-2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 23-03-2023 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Appeal Is Filed By Assessee Against The Final Assessment Order Dated 29.04.2022 Passed By The Ld.Dcit, Circle 4(1)(1), Bangalore For A.Y. 2017-18. The Ld.Ar Has Relied On The Specific Grounds Of Appeal Filed Before This Tribunal Which Are As Under:

For Respondent: Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 453/Bang/2022 Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/s. Mavenir Systems Pvt. Ltd., Building Beach E1 2nd Floor, The Deputy Manyata Embassy Business Commissioner of Park, Income Tax, Outer Ring Road Hebbal Kr Circle – 4 (1)(1), Puram Section, Vs. Bangalore. Bengaluru – 560 045. PAN: AAECM9663N APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Smt. Tanmayee Rajkumar, Assessee by Advocate : Dr. Manjunath Karkihalli, Revenue by CIT DR Date of Hearing : 05-01-2023 Date of Pronouncement : 23-03-2023…

M/S. Continental Automotive Components India Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 280/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neera Malhotra, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 92C

…omparable with any other software development company such as the assessee due to its huge turnover and high profit margin and also as it is into software products and owns intangible intellectual property rights. In the case of Agnity India Technologies Ltd, 36 Taxmann.com 289 (Del), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that Infosys Ltd is not comparable to other software development company. Relevant paragraphs are reproduced hereunder: IT(TP)A No.280/Bang/2021 Page 71 of 115 "8. It is a common case that Satyam Computer Services Ltd. should not be taken into consideration. The Tribunal for valid and good rea…

M/S. Aaris Group India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 177/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 177/Bang/2022 (Assessment Year: 2017-18)

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, CIT-DR

Section 144CSection 234BSection 92D

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU “C” BENCH, BENGALURU Before Shri Chandra Poojari, Accountant Member and Smt. Beena Pillai, Judicial Member IT(TP)A No. 177/Bang/2022 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/s. Arris Group India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, Circle - 1(1)(1) 33/1 3rd Floor, The Senate Bmtc Building Usloor Road, Usloor Kormangala Bangalore 560042 Bengaluru 560095 Bangalore 560100 PAN – AAECP2172M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Salil Kapoor, Advocate Revenue by: Shri Praveen Karanth, CIT-DR Date of hearing: 03.11.2022 Date of pronouncement: 20.01.2023 O R D E R Per: Beena Pillai, J.M. Prese…

M/S. Ibm India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-4, Bangalore

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands partly allowed

ITA 2588/BANG/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore30 Dec 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Respondent: Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 2588/Bang/2019 Assessment Year : 2006-07 M/s. IBM India Pvt. Ltd., The Joint No. 12, Subramanya Commissioner of Arcade, Income Tax, Bannerghatta Road, Special Range-4, Bangalore – 560 029. Vs. Bengaluru. PAN: AAACI4403L APPELLANT RESPONDENT : Shri Percy Pardiwala, Sr. Assessee by Advocate : Shri K. Sankar Ganesh, JCIT Revenue by DR ITAT Date of Hearing : 17-11-2022 Date of Pronouncement : 30-12-2022 ORDER PER BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER Present appea…

Global E-Business Operations Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5(3)(2), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 174/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore16 Nov 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George George K.

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Harinder Kumar, D.R

Section 144(3)Section 37Section 92C

…IT(TP)A No.174/Bang/2022 M/s. Global E-Business Operations Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No.174/Bang/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/s. Global E-Business Operations Pvt. Ltd. 1st Floor, Hewlett Packard Deputy Commissioner Enterprise of Income-tax Sy.No.192, Whitefield Road Vs. Circle 5(3)(2) Mahadevpura Post Bangalore Bangalore PAN NO : AABCG2843D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.R. Respondent by : Shri Harinder Kumar, D.R. Dat…

M/S Dell International Services India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Ltu, Bangalore

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and the revenue are partly allowed

ITA 932/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Smt. Beena Pillai & Ms. Padmavathy Sit(Tp)A No.844/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 The Joint Vs. M/S.Dell International Services India Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Ltu, (For The Merged Entity Dell India Bangalore. Private Limited), No.12/1, 12/2A, 13/1A, Divyashree Gardens, Challagutta Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore – 560 071. Pan : Aaach1925Q Appellant Respondent It(Tp)A No.932/Bang/2017 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S.Dell International Services Vs. The Joint Commissioner India Private Limited, Of Income Tax, Ltu, (For The Merged Entity Dell India Bangalore. Private Limited), Bangalore – 560 071. Pan : Aaach1925Q Appellant Respondent Revenue By : Shri Manjunath Karkihalli, Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Assessee By : Shri T. Suryanarayana, Advocate Date Of Hearing : 07.11.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 14.11.2022

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri

Section 143(2)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Ms. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER IT(TP)A No.844/Bang/2017 Assessment year : 2012-13 The Joint Vs. M/s.Dell International Services India Commissioner of Private Limited, Income Tax, LTU, (for the merged entity Dell India Bangalore. Private Limited), No.12/1, 12/2A, 13/1A, Divyashree Gardens, Challagutta Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore – 560 071. PAN : AAACH1925Q APPELLANT RESPONDENT IT(TP)A No.932/Bang/2017 Assessment year : 2012-13 M/s.Dell International Services Vs. The Joint Commissioner India Private L…

Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Ltu), Bangalore vs. M/S Dell International Services India Private Limited, Bangalore

In the result, the appeals of the assessee and the revenue are partly allowed

ITA 844/BANG/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Nov 2022AY 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri T. Suryanarayana, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri

Section 143(2)Section 92C

Ocwen Financial Solutions Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Special Range-5, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 342/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore14 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am It(Tp)A No.342/Bang/2021 : Asst.Year 2016-2017 M/S.Ocwen Financial Solutions The Assistant Commissioner Private Limited Of Income-Tax V. Pritech Park, Survey No.51 To Special Range – 5 64/4, Block No.12, Unit 2, 5B & Bangalore. 6A Floors, Bellandur Village, Sarjapur Marathahalli Ring Road Bengaluru – 560 103. Pan : Aaaco3764E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Sri.Ankur Pai & Sri. K.R.Vasudevan, Advocates Respondent By : Sri.K.Sankar Ganesh, Jcit-Dr Date Of Pronouncement : 14.10.2022 Date Of Hearing : 13.10.2022 O R D E R Per George George K, Jm : This Appeal At The Instance Of The Assessee Is Directed Against Final Assessment Order Dated 30.03.2021 Passed U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 144C(13) Of The I.T.Act. The Relevant Assessment Year Is 2016-2017. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are As Follows: The Assessee Is A Company Engaged In Providing It Enabled Services To Ocwen Mortgage Servicing Inc. Usvi. The Assessee Is A Wholly Owned Subsidiary Of Ocwen Asia Holdings Limited, Mauritius. For The Assessment Year 2016-2017, The Return Of Income Was Filed On 29.11.2016 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.93,31,44,800. The Case Was Selected For Scrutiny

For Appellant: Sri.Ankur Pai & Sri. K.R.Vasudevan, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Sri.K.Sankar Ganesh, JCIT-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “A”, BANGALORE Before Shri George George K, JM & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, AM IT(TP)A No.342/Bang/2021 : Asst.Year 2016-2017 M/s.Ocwen Financial Solutions The Assistant Commissioner Private Limited of Income-tax v. Pritech Park, Survey No.51 to Special Range – 5 64/4, Block No.12, Unit 2, 5B & Bangalore. 6A Floors, Bellandur Village, Sarjapur Marathahalli Ring Road Bengaluru – 560 103. PAN : AAACO3764E. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.Ankur Pai & Sri. K.R.Vasudevan, Advocates Respondent by : Sri.K.Sankar Ganesh, JCIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 14.1…

Hewlett Packard (India) Software Operation Private Limited, 2016-17 vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 213/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore03 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariit(Tp)A No.213/Bang/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Capt. Pradeep Arya, D.R

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…omparable with any other software development company such as the assessee due to its huge turnover and high profit margin and also as it is into software products and owns intangible intellectual property rights. In the case of Agnity India Technologies Ltd, 36 Taxmann.com 289 (Del), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that Infosys Ltd is not comparable to other software development company. Relevant paragraphs are reproduced hereunder: " 8. It is a common case that Satyam Computer Services Ltd. should not be taken into consideration. The Tribunal for valid and good reasons has pointed out that Infosys Technol…

Global E-Business Operations Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 212/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Sept 2022AY 2016-17

For Appellant: Sri.P.C.Kincha, CAFor Respondent: Sri.Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT-DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 37Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCHES “B”, BANGALORE Before Shri George George K, JM & Ms.Padmavathy S, AM IT(TP)A No.212/Bang/2021 : Asst.Year 2016-2017 M/s.Global E-Business The Deputy Commissioner of Operations Private Limited Income-tax, Circle 3(1)(1) v. Bangalore. 1st Floor, Hewlett Packard Enterprises, Sy No.192, Whitefield Road, Mahadevpura Post Bangalore – 560 048. PAN : AABCG2843D. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by : Sri.P.C.Kincha, CA Respondent by : Sri.Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT-DR Date of Pronouncement : 27.09.2022 Date of Hearing : 26.09.2022 O R D E R Per George George K, JM :…

Infor (India) Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. ACIT Central Circle-2(1), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 228/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad25 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Charyआ.अपी.सं / Ita-Tp No. 228/Hyd/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Infor (India) Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Hyderabad Of Income Tax, [Pan No. Aaacb6197Q] Circle-2(1), Hyderabad अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Moti Lala, ARFor Respondent: Shri Solge Jost Kottaram, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)Section 144C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA-TP No. 228/Hyd/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Infor (India) Private Limited, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Hyderabad of Income Tax, [PAN No. AAACB6197Q] Circle-2(1), Hyderabad अपीलधर्थी / Appellant प्रत्‍यर्थी / Respondent स्‍र्थगि आवेदि सं. / S.A. No. 13/Hyd/2022 (Arising out of ITA No.228/Hyd/2022) (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Infor (India) Private Limited, Vs The Assi…

Eit Services India Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(1)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 210/BANG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore22 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Padam Chand Khincha, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Praveen Karanth, D.R

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 92D

…)A No.210/Bang/2021 EIT Services India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Page 24 of 66 due to its huge turnover and high profit margin and also as it is into software products and owns intangible intellectual property rights. In the case of Agnity India Technologies Ltd, 36 Taxmann.com 289 (Del), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that Infosys Ltd is not comparable to other software development company. Relevant paragraphs are reproduced hereunder: " 8. It is a common case that Satyam Computer Services Ltd. should not be taken into consideration. The Tribunal for valid and good reasons has pointed out that Infosys Techno…

S&P Capital Iq (India) Private Limited (Successor in Interest of Snl Financial (I) Pvt Ltd), Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1652/HYD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad11 Aug 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

For Appellant: Shri K.C.Devdas, ARFor Respondent: 01/08/2022

Section 10TSection 143(3)Section 144C

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ म" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCHES “A”, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI K.NARASIMHA CHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आ.अपी.सं / ITA-TP No. 1652/Hyd/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10) S&P Capital IQ (India) Private Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax, (Successor in interest of SNL Circle-3(1), Financial (India) Private Hyderabad Limited), Hyderabad [PAN No. AACCS8657G] अपीलाथ" / Appellant "" यथ" / Respondent "नधा"रती "वारा / Assessee by: Shri K.C.Devdas, AR Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR राज" व "वारा / Revenue b…

Indeed India Operations Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. DCIT-2(1), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 254/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad10 Aug 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2016-17 Indeed India Operations Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Private Limited, Of Income Tax, Hyderabad. Circle – 2(1), Pan : Aadci5931J. Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri H. Srinivasulu Revenue By: Shri Rajendra Kumar, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 11.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 10.08.2022

For Appellant: Shri H. SrinivasuluFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR

Section 143(3)

…omparable with any other software development company such as the assessee due to its huge turnover and high profit margin and also as it is into software products and owns intangible intellectual property rights. In the case of Agnity India Technologies Ltd, 36 Taxmann.com 289 (Del), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that Infosys Ltd is not comparable to other software development company. Relevant paragraphs are reproduced hereunder: "8. It is a common case that Satyam Computer Serv ices Ltd. should not be taken into consideration. The Tribunal for valid and good reasons has pointed out :- that Infosys Tech…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(1)(1), Bangalore vs. M/S Altisource Business Solutions India Pvt Ltd, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee stands allowed as indicated hereinabove and appeal filed by revenue stands dismissed

ITA 164/BANG/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jun 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 162/Bang/2018 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/S. Altisource Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Pritech Park, 3Rd & 5Th Floors Of Wing A & The Deputy 4Th Floor Of Wing B, Commissioner Of Block No. 12, Pritech Park, Income Tax, Survey No. 51-64/4, Circle – 1 (1)(2), Bellandur Village, Bangalore. Vs. Sarjapur Marathahalli Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560 103. Pan: Aaaco9467A Appellant Respondent & It(Tp)A No. 164/Bang/2018 Assessment Year : 2012-13 (By Revenue) : Shri K.R. Vasudevan, Assessee By Advocate : Smt. Susan Dolores George Revenue By Cit (Osd) Date Of Hearing : 30-05-2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 29-06-2022 Order Per Beena Pillaipresent Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Against Order Dated 31.08.2017 Passed By The Ld.Cit(A)-1, Bangalore For A.Y. 2012-13 On Following Grounds Of Appeal:

Section 92C(3)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 162/Bang/2018 Assessment Year : 2012-13 M/s. Altisource Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd., Pritech Park, 3rd and 5th Floors of wing A & The Deputy 4th Floor of Wing B, Commissioner of Block No. 12, Pritech Park, Income Tax, Survey No. 51-64/4, Circle – 1 (1)(2), Bellandur Village, Bangalore. Vs. Sarjapur Marathahalli Outer Ring Road, Bangalore – 560 103. PAN: AAACO9467A APPELLANT RESPONDENT & IT(TP)A No. 164/Bang/2018 Assessment Year : 2012-13 (By Revenue) : Shri…

M/S. Ge Be Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle- 3(1)(2), Bangalore

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2615/BANG/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 May 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri George K. George

For Appellant: Shri Sachit Jolly &For Respondent: Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R

Section 143(3)Section 92D

…IT(TP)A No.2615/Bang/2019 M/s. GE BE Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A’’ BENCH: BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND Shri GEORGE K. GEORGE, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No.2615/Bang/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. GE BE Private Limited 60, Export Promotion Industrial Park Deputy Commissioner Whitefield, of Income-tax Vs. Bengaluru 560 066 Circle-3(1)(2) Bengaluru PAN NO : AAACG6714A APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Sachit Jolly & Shri Aayush Nagpal, A.Rs Respondent by : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, D.R. Date of Hearing : 17.05.2022 Date of Pronouncement…

American Power Conversion (India) Private Limited, Bangalore vs. Addl.C.I.T., Bangalore

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed as indicated herein above

ITA 1111/BANG/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore28 Feb 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri. Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillaiit(Tp)A No. 1111/Bang/2012 Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri Ketan Ved, CA

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘A’ BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI. CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER IT(TP)A No. 1111/Bang/2012 Assessment Year : 2008-09 M/s. Schneider Electric IT Business India Pvt. Ltd., [formerly known as The Additional American Power Commissioner of Conversion (India) Pvt. Income Tax, Ltd.] LTU, 187/3 & 188/3, Jigani, Vs. Bangalore. Bangalore – 562 106. PAN: AACCA6398Q APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri Ketan Ved, CA : Shri Sumer Singh Meena, Revenue by CIT DR (OSD) Date of Hearing : 20-12-2021 Date of Pronouncement : 28-02-2022 ORDER PER BE…

Adp Private Limited, Ranga Reddy vs. DCIT, Circle-1( 1), Hyderabad

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 228/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri H. SrinivasuluFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 143(3)Section 92C

…omparable with any other software development company such as the assessee due to its huge turnover and high profit margin and also as it is into software products and owns intangible intellectual property rights. In the case of Agnity India Technologies Ltd, 36 Taxmann.com 289 (Del), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that Infosys Ltd is not comparable to other software development company. Relevant paragraphs are reproduced hereunder: "8. It is a common case that Satyam Computer Services Ltd. should not be taken into consideration. The Tribunal for valid and good reasons has pointed out :- 25 -: ITA Nos..22…

Adp Private Limited (31/10/2015), Ranga Reddy vs. DCIT, Circle-1( 1), Hyderabad

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 227/HYD/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad03 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri H. SrinivasuluFor Respondent: Shri YVST Sai

Section 143(3)Section 92C

…omparable with any other software development company such as the assessee due to its huge turnover and high profit margin and also as it is into software products and owns intangible intellectual property rights. In the case of Agnity India Technologies Ltd, 36 Taxmann.com 289 (Del), the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that Infosys Ltd is not comparable to other software development company. Relevant paragraphs are reproduced hereunder: "8. It is a common case that Satyam Computer Services Ltd. should not be taken into consideration. The Tribunal for valid and good reasons has pointed out :- 25 -: ITA Nos..22…

Serco India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon vs. DCIT, Gurgaon

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1460/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Jan 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1460/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Serco India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, 6Th Floor, Tower-B, Building No. 8, Circle-2, Dlf Cyber City, Phase-Ii, Gurgaon Gurgaon (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aajcs6704P Assessee By : Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, Ca Revenue By : Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.01.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 10.01.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, CAFor Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR

Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I-2’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Saktijit Dey, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1460/Del/2014 : Asstt. Year : 2009-10 Serco India Pvt. Ltd., Vs DCIT, 6th Floor, Tower-B, Building No. 8, Circle-2, DLF Cyber City, Phase-II, Gurgaon Gurgaon (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAJCS6704P Assessee by : Sh. Suraj Bhan Nain, CA Revenue by : Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 04.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 10.01.2022 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dated…