CIT, Gujarat II v. Surendra Gulab Chand Modi

140 ITR 517High Court1983#1280 most cited

What is CIT, Gujarat II v. Surendra Gulab Chand Modi authority for?

Protective assessments should not be deleted or disposed of by lower authorities, but rather allowed to remain in effect until the related substantive assessment proceedings attain finality before the High Court or Supreme Court.

88

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,418 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Surendra Gulab Chand Modi · 140 ITR 517 · protective assessment · substantive assessment · finality of assessment · deletion of protective assessment · appeal pending superior courts · section 143(3) · section 153A

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT, Gujarat II v. Surendra Gulab Chand Modi

M/S. Mrigiya Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ACIT, CC-VII, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed and both appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 153/KOL/2015[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2019AY 2007-2008

Bench: Sh. P.M.Jagtap & Sh.S.S.Viswanethra Ravivs Acit, M/S. Mrigiya Electronics Pvt.Ltd., P-41, Princep Street, Central Circle-Vii, Kolkata-700001. Aayakar Bhawan, Purva, Pan-Aabcm6918M 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107 (Appellant) (Resondent) Vs M/S. Acit, Mrigiya Electronics Central Circle-3(1), Industries P.Ltd., P-41, Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, Princep Street, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700001. Kolkata-700107. Pan-Aabcm6918K (Appellant) (Resondent) Vs M/S. Dcit, Mrigiya Electronics Central Circle-Vii, P.Ltd., P-41, Princep Street, Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aabcm6918K 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107. (Appellant) (Resondent) Appellant By None Respondent By Sh.A.K.Nayak, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 26.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement 05.04.2019 Order Per S.S. Viswanethra Raviall These Three Appeals Above Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Against Separate Orders Dated 14.11.2014, 14.11.2014 & 28.03.2013 Passed By Cit(A)-1, Kolkata For Ay & 2007-08, 2007-08 & 2008-09 Respectively.

Section 131Section 143(3)

…ssessment, an appeal against the protective assessment should ordinarily await the outcome of the substantive assessment so that the protective assessment can be inconformity with the substantive assessment. In the case of CIT –vs.- Surendra Gulab Chand Modi (140 ITR 517), the appeal arising out of the protective assessment was disposed of by the appellate authority i.e. Tribunal vacating the protective assessment without waiting for the final outcome of the proceedings arising f rom the substantive assessment, which matter was pending in the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court held that the Tri…

ACIT, CC-3(1), Kolkata vs. M/S. Mrigiya Electronics Industries (P) Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed and both appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 116/KOL/2015[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2019AY 2007-2008

Bench: Sh. P.M.Jagtap & Sh.S.S.Viswanethra Ravivs Acit, M/S. Mrigiya Electronics Pvt.Ltd., P-41, Princep Street, Central Circle-Vii, Kolkata-700001. Aayakar Bhawan, Purva, Pan-Aabcm6918M 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107 (Appellant) (Resondent) Vs M/S. Acit, Mrigiya Electronics Central Circle-3(1), Industries P.Ltd., P-41, Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, Princep Street, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700001. Kolkata-700107. Pan-Aabcm6918K (Appellant) (Resondent) Vs M/S. Dcit, Mrigiya Electronics Central Circle-Vii, P.Ltd., P-41, Princep Street, Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aabcm6918K 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107. (Appellant) (Resondent) Appellant By None Respondent By Sh.A.K.Nayak, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 26.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement 05.04.2019 Order Per S.S. Viswanethra Raviall These Three Appeals Above Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Against Separate Orders Dated 14.11.2014, 14.11.2014 & 28.03.2013 Passed By Cit(A)-1, Kolkata For Ay & 2007-08, 2007-08 & 2008-09 Respectively.

Section 131Section 143(3)

…ssessment, an appeal against the protective assessment should ordinarily await the outcome of the substantive assessment so that the protective assessment can be inconformity with the substantive assessment. In the case of CIT –vs.- Surendra Gulab Chand Modi (140 ITR 517), the appeal arising out of the protective assessment was disposed of by the appellate authority i.e. Tribunal vacating the protective assessment without waiting for the final outcome of the proceedings arising f rom the substantive assessment, which matter was pending in the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court held that the Tri…

D.C.I.T CC - VII, Kolkata vs. M/S Mrigiya Electronics( P) Ltd, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed and both appeals of the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1867/KOL/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Apr 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Sh. P.M.Jagtap & Sh.S.S.Viswanethra Ravivs Acit, M/S. Mrigiya Electronics Pvt.Ltd., P-41, Princep Street, Central Circle-Vii, Kolkata-700001. Aayakar Bhawan, Purva, Pan-Aabcm6918M 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107 (Appellant) (Resondent) Vs M/S. Acit, Mrigiya Electronics Central Circle-3(1), Industries P.Ltd., P-41, Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, Princep Street, 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700001. Kolkata-700107. Pan-Aabcm6918K (Appellant) (Resondent) Vs M/S. Dcit, Mrigiya Electronics Central Circle-Vii, P.Ltd., P-41, Princep Street, Aayakar Bhawan, Poorva, Kolkata-700001. Pan-Aabcm6918K 110, Shantipally, Kolkata-700107. (Appellant) (Resondent) Appellant By None Respondent By Sh.A.K.Nayak, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 26.03.2019 Date Of Pronouncement 05.04.2019 Order Per S.S. Viswanethra Raviall These Three Appeals Above Filed By The Assessee & The Revenue Against Separate Orders Dated 14.11.2014, 14.11.2014 & 28.03.2013 Passed By Cit(A)-1, Kolkata For Ay & 2007-08, 2007-08 & 2008-09 Respectively.

Section 131Section 143(3)

…ssessment, an appeal against the protective assessment should ordinarily await the outcome of the substantive assessment so that the protective assessment can be inconformity with the substantive assessment. In the case of CIT –vs.- Surendra Gulab Chand Modi (140 ITR 517), the appeal arising out of the protective assessment was disposed of by the appellate authority i.e. Tribunal vacating the protective assessment without waiting for the final outcome of the proceedings arising f rom the substantive assessment, which matter was pending in the Hon’ble Supreme Court. The Hon’ble Gujarat High Court held that the Tri…