Chetan Sabharwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

110 Taxmann.com 57High Court2019#7622 most cited

What is Chetan Sabharwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax authority for?

Reopening an assessment does not constitute a change of opinion if the original assessment order was silent on the specific issue that forms the basis for the reopening.

14

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Chetan Sabharwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax · Section 143(3) · Section 147 · change of opinion · reassessment · silent assessment order · tangible material

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Chetan Sabharwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Nvidia Graphics Private Limited, Bengaluru vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2(4), Bangalore

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee s party allowed

ITA 1111/BANG/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George George K & Ms. Padmavathi. Sr Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/S. Nvidia Graphics Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Acit, Mahadevpura Village, Central Circle – 2(4), K. R. Puram Hobli, Marathalli Bangalore. Bagmane Goldstone Building, North Tower, Mahadevpura S.O, Bangalore – 560 048. Pan : Aabcn 9200 H Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri. Nageshwar Rao, Advocate Revenue By : Ms. Neha Sahay, Jcit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 17.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 23.10.2024

For Appellant: Shri. Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 234BSection 234CSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 28

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, VICE PRESIDENT AND MS. PADMAVATHI. S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBERR Assessment Year : 2014-15 M/s. Nvidia Graphics Pvt. Ltd., Vs. ACIT, Mahadevpura Village, Central Circle – 2(4), K. R. Puram Hobli, Marathalli Bangalore. Bagmane Goldstone Building, North Tower, Mahadevpura S.O, Bangalore – 560 048. PAN : AABCN 9200 H APPELLANT RESPONDENT Assessee by : Shri. Nageshwar Rao, Advocate Revenue by : Ms. Neha Sahay, JCIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 17.10.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 23.10.2024 O R D E R Per George George K, Vice P…

Chetan Sabharwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (110 Taxmann.com 57) — Cited in 14 Judgments | BharatTax