Chemmancherry Estates Co. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-VIII(2)

111 Taxmann.com 66High Court2019#16485 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,607 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2025.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Chemmancherry Estates Co. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-VIII(2)

Vinodhini, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle-1(2), Chennai

Appeal stand allowed

ITA 921/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.921/Chny/2023 (िनधा9रण वष9 / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Mrs. Vinodhini Acit बनाम/ Flat No.14, Door No.98, Central Circle-1(2) Harrington Road, Chetpet, Vs. Chennai. Chennai-600 031. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Bmapv-2726-D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate)- Ld.Ar " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Nilay Baran Som (Cit)-Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 20-06-2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18-09-2024

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj (Advocate)- Ld.ARFor Respondent: Shri Nilay Baran Som (CIT)-Ld. Sr. DR
Section 153CSection 2(14)

…as mentioned in Sec.132(4) and therefore, it has got evidentiary value. The copy of proforma for recording of satisfaction u/s 153C has also been placed on record. The decision of Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of Chemmancherry Estates Co. vs. ITO (111 Taxmann.com 66) has also been referred on merits. The Ld. AR, on the other hand, has submitted that the land was bought and sold as agricultural land only. The said land was included as urban land by way of subsequent notification only and therefore, the said notification would not apply since the sale has taken place much before issuance of aforesaid n…

Chemmancherry Estates Co. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-VIII(2) (111 Taxmann.com 66) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax