Chadha v. ITO
202 Taxmann 395High Court2011#3166 most cited
What is Chadha v. ITO authority for?
Jewellery found during a search that is adequately explained as being owned by a married lady for a long time, even without documentary evidence, should not be added to income, as this recognizes realities of life.
37
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Chadha v. ITO · 202 Taxmann 395 · unexplained jewellery · jewellery found during search · married lady · streedhan · reasonable quantity of jewellery · documentary evidence · realities of life · addition to income