DCIT, Cir. 4(1), Kolkata vs. M/S Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd, Kolkata
In the result, appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 191/KOL/2021[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Aug 2023AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble
For Appellant: Shri A.K. Bandyopahdyay, A/RFor Respondent: Shri P.P. Barman, Addl. CIT, Sr. D/R
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 250
…mages have been deducted. For giving relief to the assessee the Ld. CIT(A) has relied on I.T.A. No. 191/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/s. Andrew Yule & Co. Ltd. 8 the order of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Central Trading Agency Vs. CIT 56 ITR 561 (All) wherein the Hon’ble High Court allowed the expenses incurred for liquidated damages under the head commercial expediency and also the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Indane Bislers 91 ITR 427 (Mad). Our attention was drawn to the copies of the contract and other details and we agree with the Ld. CIT(A) that i…