(Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.

103 Taxmann.com 48Supreme Court of India2019#76 most cited

What is (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd. authority for?

When assessing cash credits, share capital, or loans, the assessee bears the onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. This burden is not discharged merely by documentary evidence if field inquiries reveal accommodation entries or dealings with paper/shell companies.

696

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 371,886 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2026.

Also referred to as

NRA Iron & Steel · (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel · Section 68 · cash credit · share capital · share application money · unexplained loan · onus of proof · creditworthiness · genuineness of transaction · paper company · shell company · accommodation entries

Sections most often in play

Section 68Section 143(3)Section 147Section 10(38)Section 148Section 69CSection 131Section 133(6)

Issues it is cited on

price riggingbogus share capitalbogus long term capital gainonus of proofpenny stockpaper companypreponderance of probabilitycreditworthiness of the creditorsection 10(38)bogus ltcgshell companysource of source

Judgments citing (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.

Income Tax Officer Ward 1 Jhunjhunu, Jhunjhunu vs. Bagaria Trade Impex, Churu

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed and order of the AO is

ITA 697/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

For Appellant: Mr. Sandeep Goel, Adv., Ld. ARFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-DR
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCH “A”, JAIPUR BEFORE Dr. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.696, 697 & 705/JPR/2025 (A. Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15) Income Tax Officer, Ward-01, Jhunjhunu Appellant Vs. Bagaria Trade Impex, Near, State Bank of India, Churu 331 001 PAN No.: AALFB 6581E Respondent Appellant by : Mr. Sandeep Goel, Adv., Ld. AR Respondent by : Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-DR Date of hearing : 11/09/2025 Date of pronouncement : 29/09/2025 ORDER PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M: These three appeals by revenue are directed against the order of NFAC, Delhi dated 27.0…

Income Tax Officer Ward 1 Jhunjhunu, Jhunjhunu vs. Bagaria Trade Impex, Churu

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is allowed and order of the AO is

ITA 696/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur29 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. S. Seethalakshmi & Shri Gagan Goyal

For Appellant: Mr. Sandeep Goel, Adv., Ld. ARFor Respondent: Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-DR
Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR BENCH “A”, JAIPUR BEFORE Dr. S. SEETHALAKSHMI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GAGAN GOYAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.696, 697 & 705/JPR/2025 (A. Y. 2013-14 & 2014-15) Income Tax Officer, Ward-01, Jhunjhunu Bagaria Trade Impex, Near, State Bank of India, Churu 331 001 PAN No.: AALFB 6581E Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant by : Mr. Sandeep Goel, Adv., Ld. AR Respondent by : Mrs. Anita Rinesh, JCIT-DR Date of hearing : 11/09/2025 Date of pronouncement : 29/09/2025 ORDER PER GAGAN GOYAL, A.M: These three appeals by revenue are directed against the order of NFAC, Delhi da…

Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, CC-2, Kanpur vs. Shri.Mohammad Asfand Akhtar, Kanpur

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 144/LKW/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2018-19 Dcit, Cc-2 V. Shri Mohammad Asfand Laxmi Niwas, 10/503, Akhtar Allenganj, Kanpur-208001. Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, Kanpur Nagar-208010. Tan/Pan: Aempa0823R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shri Mohammad Asfand Akhtar V. Dcit, Central Circle-Ii Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, 10/503, Allenganj, Kanpur- Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, 208001. Kanpur Nagar-208010. Tan/Pan: Aempa0823R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, Advocate Respondent By: Shri R. K. Agarwal, Cit(Dr) O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. K. Agarwal, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)Section 37Section 41Section 41(1)Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 DCIT, CC-2 v. Shri Mohammad Asfand Laxmi Niwas, 10/503, Akhtar Allenganj, Kanpur-208001. Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, Kanpur Nagar-208010. TAN/PAN: AEMPA0823R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shri Mohammad Asfand Akhtar v. DCIT, Central Circle-II Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, 10/503, Allenganj, Kanpur- Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, 208001. Kanpur Nagar-208010. TAN/PAN: AEMPA0823R (Appel…

Mohd. Asfand Akhtar, Kanpur vs. Deputi Commissioner of Income Tax CC-2, Kanpur

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA

ITA 139/LKW/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Lucknow26 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Anadee Nath Misshraassessment Year: 2018-19 Dcit, Cc-2 V. Shri Mohammad Asfand Laxmi Niwas, 10/503, Akhtar Allenganj, Kanpur-208001. Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, Kanpur Nagar-208010. Tan/Pan: Aempa0823R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shri Mohammad Asfand Akhtar V. Dcit, Central Circle-Ii Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, 10/503, Allenganj, Kanpur- Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, 208001. Kanpur Nagar-208010. Tan/Pan: Aempa0823R (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, Advocate Respondent By: Shri R. K. Agarwal, Cit(Dr) O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Ashish Jaiswal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri R. K. Agarwal, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)Section 37Section 41Section 41(1)Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL LUCKNOW BENCH “A”, LUCKNOW BEFORE SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 DCIT, CC-2 v. Shri Mohammad Asfand Laxmi Niwas, 10/503, Akhtar Allenganj, Kanpur-208001. Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, Kanpur Nagar-208010. TAN/PAN: AEMPA0823R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2018-19 Shri Mohammad Asfand Akhtar v. DCIT, Central Circle-II Plot No.02, Block-B, Scheme-39, 10/503, Allenganj, Kanpur- Ram Rai Ki Sarai, Jajmau, 208001. Kanpur Nagar-208010. TAN/PAN: AEMPA0823R (Appel…

B & B Sharecom Pvt Ltd., Hisar vs. DCIT, Circle, Hisar

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2877/DEL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shris.Rifaur Rahmanb & B Sharecom Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dcit, Circle, 133, 1St Floor, Parijat Complex, Hisar. Hisar – 125 001. (Pan :Aagcb1363A) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri K. Sampath, Advocate Shri V Rajakumar, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Abhishek Deavel, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 22.08.2025 Date Of Order : 24.09.2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Deavel, Sr. DR
Section 133Section 143(2)Section 271Section 43(5)Section 68

…make the investment in the assessee company and he relied page 30 of the order of the first appellate authority and he justified the findings of the lower authorities on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of NRA Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 412 ITR 161. He further submitted that several notices were issued by the AO were not served on the investor companies and finally he supported the findings of the lower authorities. 11. In the rejoinder, ld. AR submitted that the assessee has already proved the genuineness of the transaction and all the funds were transferred through banking channel. There…

DCIT CC 7(3), Mumbai vs. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1596/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar & Deputy Commissioner Of V/S. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/Mum/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 1595/Mum/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, बनाम Income Tax, Central Circle –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh Mehta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Misra, (CIT-DR)
Section 131(1)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Deputy Commissioner of v/s. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AALPP1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/MUM/2020 (Arising out of ITA No. 1595/MUM/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, v…

DCIT CC 7(3), Mumbai vs. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1595/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Narender Kumar Choudhry & Shri Prabhash Shankar & Deputy Commissioner Of V/S. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/Mum/2020 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 1595/Mum/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, V/S. Deputy Commissioner Of 601, 6Th Floor, Petit Towers, बनाम Income Tax, Central Circle –7(3), Room No. 655, 6Th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. Corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aalpp1508R Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh Mehta, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Misra, (CIT-DR)
Section 131(1)Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & Deputy Commissioner of v/s. Smt. Sakhiben Patel, Income Tax, Central Circle बनाम 601, 6th Floor, Petit Towers, –7(3), Room No. 655, 6th August Kranti Marg, Kemps Floor, Aaykar Bhawan, M.K. corner, Mumbai – 400 036, Road, Mumbai - 400 020, Maharashtra Maharashtra स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AALPP1508R Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी प्रत्याक्षेपसं/C.O. No.71/MUM/2020 (Arising out of ITA No. 1595/MUM/2019) (A.Y. 2012-13) Smt. Sakhiben Patel, v…

M/S Real Time Consultants Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai vs. ITO 15(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for

ITA 3290/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Shri Prabhash Shankar

For Appellant: Shri Rushabh Mehta,ARFor Respondent: Shri Uma Shankar Prasad, (CIT DR)
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.3290/MUM/2019 (A.Y. 2011-12) M/s Real Time Consultants v/s. Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 15(3)(1), Room No. 456, 4th Office No. 201, 2nd Floor, A-2 Wing, Kailas Complex, Bhandup (West), Mumbai 400078, Maharashtra Floor, Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400020, Maharashtra बनाम स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAFCR0109P Appellant/अपीलार्थी .. Respondent/प्रतिवादी Appellant by : Shri Rushabh Mehta,AR Respondent by : Shri Uma Shankar Prasad, (CIT DR) Date of…

DCIT Central Circle 7 (1), Mumbai vs. Ramrao Adik Educ Society, Mumbai

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 2276/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

Section 12ASection 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 250Section 4Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 1509/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 1510/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1511/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1512/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) I.T.A. No. 1513/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2015-16) I.T.A. No. 1514/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) I.T.A. No. 1515/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramrao Adik Education Society, Patil Building, Adarsh Nagar, Opp Mig Colony, Worli, Mumbai-400018. PAN: AAATR3978A DCIT, Central Circle-7(1), Aayakar B…

DCIT Central Circle 7 1, Mumbai vs. Ramrao Adik Educ Society, Mumbai

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 2272/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

Section 11Section 12ASection 132Section 132(4)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 9

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 1509/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 1510/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1511/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1512/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) I.T.A. No. 1513/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2015-16) I.T.A. No. 1514/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) I.T.A. No. 1515/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramrao Adik Education Society, Patil Building, Adarsh Nagar, Opp Mig Colony, Worli, Mumbai-400018. PAN: AAATR3978A DCIT, Central Circle-7(1), Aayakar B…

DCIT Central Circle 7 (1), Mumbai vs. Ramrao Adik Educ Society, Mumbai

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 2271/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Umashankar Prasad, CIT-DR
Section 12ASection 132Section 132(4)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 9

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 1509/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 1510/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1511/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1512/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) I.T.A. No. 1513/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2015-16) I.T.A. No. 1514/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) I.T.A. No. 1515/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramrao Adik Education Society, Patil Building, Adarsh Nagar, Opp Mig Colony, Worli, Mumbai-400018. PAN: AAATR3978A DCIT, Central Circle-7(1), Aayakar B…

Ramrao Adik Education Society, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Incometax Central Circle 7(1), Mumbai

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 1515/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

Section 12ASection 132Section 132(4)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 9

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 1509/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 1510/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1511/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1512/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) I.T.A. No. 1513/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2015-16) I.T.A. No. 1514/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) I.T.A. No. 1515/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramrao Adik Education Society, Patil Building, Adarsh Nagar, Opp Mig Colony, Worli, Mumbai-400018. PAN: AAATR3978A DCIT, Central Circle-7(1), Aayakar B…

Ramrao Adik Education Society, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Incometax Central Circle 7(1), Mumbai

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 1513/MUM/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Respondent: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CA
Section 12ASection 132Section 132(4)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 9

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 1509/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 1510/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1511/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1512/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) I.T.A. No. 1513/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2015-16) I.T.A. No. 1514/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) I.T.A. No. 1515/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramrao Adik Education Society, Patil Building, Adarsh Nagar, Opp Mig Colony, Worli, Mumbai-400018. PAN: AAATR3978A DCIT, Central Circle-7(1), Aayakar B…

Ramrao Adik Education Society, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 7(1), Mumbai

Accordingly. The ground raised by the revenue is partly allowed for

ITA 1509/MUM/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla, Jm & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

Section 12ASection 132Section 132(4)Section 153CSection 250Section 68Section 9

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JM & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 1509/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2011-12) I.T.A. No. 1510/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 1511/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 1512/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) I.T.A. No. 1513/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2015-16) I.T.A. No. 1514/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2016-17) I.T.A. No. 1515/Mum/2025 (Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramrao Adik Education Society, Patil Building, Adarsh Nagar, Opp Mig Colony, Worli, Mumbai-400018. PAN: AAATR3978A DCIT, Central Circle-7(1), Aayakar B…

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2 Kolkata vs. Goodview Marketing Pvt Ltd

Accordingly, the appeal fails and is dismissed

ITAT/114/2025HC Calcutta03 Sept 2025

Bench: : The Hon’Ble The Chief Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) Date: 3Rd September, 2025 Appearance: Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …For Appellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Saumya Kejriwal, Adv. Ms. Ananya Rath, Adv. Mr. Navin Mittal, Adv. Mr. Debarghya Banerjee, Adv. …For Respondent

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 260ASection 263Section 68

…OD-2 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/114/2025 GA/2/2025 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA VS. GOODVIEW MARKETING PVT. LTD. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS) DATE: 3RD SEPTEMBER, 2025 Appearance: Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …for Appellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Saumya Kejriwal, Adv. Ms. Ananya Rath, Adv. Mr. Navin Mittal, Adv. Mr. Debarghya Banerjee, Adv. …for Respondent The Court : This appeal filed by the appel…

Income Tax Officer-27(3)(1) Mumbai, Vashi vs. Sachin Velji Shah, Mumbai

Appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1938/MUM/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai02 Sept 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Justice (Retd.) C V Bhadang & Ms Padmavathy S, Am

For Appellant: Shri Swapnil Choudhary, Sr. DRFor Respondent: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, AR
Section 10(38)Section 132(4)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 68Section 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE JUSTICE (RETD.) C V BHADANG, PRESIDENT & MS PADMAVATHY S, AM I.T.A. No. 1938/Mum/2023 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) Income Tax Officer-27(3)(1), Sachin Velji Shah, Room No. 422, 4th Floor, 72B, 4th Floor, Girdhar Nagar, Tower No.6, Vashi Railway Station Vs. Jivdaya Lane, Ghatkopar-West, Complex, Vashi, Mumbai-400086 Navi Mumbai- 400703. PAN: AWUPS7545N Appellant) : Respondent) Revenue / Appellant by : Shri Swapnil Choudhary, Sr. DR Assessee / Respondent by : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, AR : 20.08.2025 Date of Hearing : 02.09.2025 Date of Pronouncement O R…

Praveen Sitaram Agarwal, Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer, WD-24(3)(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3454/MUM/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA (Judicial Member), SMT RENU JAUHRI (Accountant Member)

Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68Section 69C

…, stating that the findings were based on independent circumstantial evidence, financial analysis, and direct SEBI reports. However, the absence of cross-examination does not invalidate the assessment, as the Supreme Court in PCIT v. NRA Iron & Steel Pvt Ltd (412 ITR 161 SC) has held that when the assessee fails to discharge the onus under Section 68, the AO is justified in making an addition based on available evidence. The AO has also pointed out that the appellant's purchase of shares itself was suspicious, as it was carried out off-market at an unrealistic premium. The purchase bills submitted by the appellan…

M/S Mool Raj Vijay Kumar, Kaushambi vs. Dy./ACIT(CC), Allahabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed

ITA 39/ALLD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad25 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 133ASection 143(3)

…rther reliance on the written submissions in which prayer has been made to confirm the additions of Rs.59,503/-, Rs.4,85,800/- and Rs.7,00,000/- In the aforesaid written submissions, reliance was placed by learned D.R. on the following case laws: (a) [2019] 412 ITR 161 (SC) Pr.CIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P.) Ltd. (assessment year 2009-10) (b) [2015] 230 taxman 268 (SC), Navodaya Castle (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT Dismissing SLP against [2014] 367 ITR 306 (Delhi) (c) [2014] 227 Taxman 373 (SC) N. Tarika Property Invest (P.) Ltd. vs. CIT dismissing SLP against [2014] 221 Taxman 14 (Delhi) (d) [2021] 277 Taxman 594 (SC), S…

Surajgovind Estates Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. D.C.I.T., Circle - 4(2), Kolkata

Appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1186/KOL/2024[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 Aug 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: him and explaining relevant entries in their books of accounts. Needless to say, none of the investors appeared before the Ld. AO in response to such summons. These factors prompted the Ld. AO to make the impugned addition which duly gave credit to amounts shown against two non-resident investors viz. Ms. Pushpa Patel and Mr. Mahendra Kumar Rajivbhai Patel.

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 250Section 68

…aside and the order passed by the CIT(A) dated 28.11.2019 is restored and the substantial questions of law are answered in favour of the revenue.” 3.1 Considerable strength is also drawn from the case of PCIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P.) Ltd. reported in [2019] 412 ITR 161 (SC) in which share application money was approved for action u/s 68 of the Act even where the share applicants had filed confirmations and attempted to show that the transactions had taken place through normal banking channels, etc. In this case, the Hon'ble Apex Court has dealt with the issue from a legal perspective and some of the passages de…

Assistantcommissionerof Incometax, Central Circle-3(2), Kolkata, Aayakar Bhawan Poorva vs. M/S. Anubandh Financial Services Private Limited, Kolkata

In the result, both the appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the Cross Objections filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2390/KOL/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 148Section 250Section 253Section 68

…r own, each one of them received from somebody and that somebody received from a third person and therefore prima facie, shareholders are near namelenders. 22. In Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central - 1) v. NRA Iron and Steel Private Limited [2019] 15 SCC 529 the issue which fell for consideration is when share capital/premium is credited in the Books of Account of the assessee company, the onus of prove is on the assessee to establish by cogent and reliable evidence of the identity of the investor company, the creditworthiness of the investor and genuineness of the transaction, to the satisfaction of…