(Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.

103 Taxmann.com 48Supreme Court of India2019#76 most cited

What is (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd. authority for?

When assessing cash credits, share capital, or loans, the assessee bears the onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. This burden is not discharged merely by documentary evidence if field inquiries reveal accommodation entries or dealings with paper/shell companies.

696

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 371,887 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2026.

Also referred to as

NRA Iron & Steel · (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel · Section 68 · cash credit · share capital · share application money · unexplained loan · onus of proof · creditworthiness · genuineness of transaction · paper company · shell company · accommodation entries

Sections most often in play

Section 68Section 143(3)Section 147Section 10(38)Section 148Section 69CSection 131Section 133(6)

Issues it is cited on

price riggingbogus share capitalbogus long term capital gainonus of proofpenny stockpaper companypreponderance of probabilitycreditworthiness of the creditorsection 10(38)bogus ltcgshell companysource of source

Judgments citing (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.

Nadidwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT CC 4(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee i

ITA 1495/MUM/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms.Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.1492 To 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 To 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. Dcit, Cc-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19Th Floor, Air India 1701, 17Th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Ita Nos.2221 To 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17) Asst. Commissioner Of Vs. Nadiadwala Grandson Income Tax, Central Circle- Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 4(4),Central Range-4 Nadiadwala Villa, Ocean Pr.Cit(C)-2,R.No. 1922, View, Jp Road, Versova, 19Th Floor, Air India Andheri (West), Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400061 Mumbai - 400021 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mani Jain & Prateek Jain Respondent By : Dr. Mahesh Akhade Date Of Hearing 24.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 07.06.2022

For Appellant: Mani Jain &For Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade
Section 132(1)Section 68

…11 Appeals, Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS.KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.1492 to 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 to 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19th Floor, Air India 1701, 17th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No: AACCN0909J Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.2221 to 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum…

Nadidwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT CC-4(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee i

ITA 1494/MUM/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms.Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.1492 To 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 To 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. Dcit, Cc-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19Th Floor, Air India 1701, 17Th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Ita Nos.2221 To 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17) Asst. Commissioner Of Vs. Nadiadwala Grandson Income Tax, Central Circle- Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 4(4),Central Range-4 Nadiadwala Villa, Ocean Pr.Cit(C)-2,R.No. 1922, View, Jp Road, Versova, 19Th Floor, Air India Andheri (West), Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400061 Mumbai - 400021 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mani Jain & Prateek Jain Respondent By : Dr. Mahesh Akhade Date Of Hearing 24.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 07.06.2022

For Appellant: Mani Jain &For Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade
Section 132(1)Section 68

…11 Appeals, Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS.KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.1492 to 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 to 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19th Floor, Air India 1701, 17th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No: AACCN0909J Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.2221 to 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum…

Nadidwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT CC-4(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee i

ITA 1493/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms.Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.1492 To 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 To 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. Dcit, Cc-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19Th Floor, Air India 1701, 17Th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Ita Nos.2221 To 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17) Asst. Commissioner Of Vs. Nadiadwala Grandson Income Tax, Central Circle- Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 4(4),Central Range-4 Nadiadwala Villa, Ocean Pr.Cit(C)-2,R.No. 1922, View, Jp Road, Versova, 19Th Floor, Air India Andheri (West), Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400061 Mumbai - 400021 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mani Jain & Prateek Jain Respondent By : Dr. Mahesh Akhade Date Of Hearing 24.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 07.06.2022

For Appellant: Mani Jain &For Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade
Section 132(1)Section 68

…11 Appeals, Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS.KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.1492 to 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 to 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19th Floor, Air India 1701, 17th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No: AACCN0909J Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.2221 to 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum…

Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT CC-4(4), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the assessee i

ITA 1492/MUM/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh & Ms.Kavitha Rajagopalita Nos.1492 To 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 To 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. Dcit, Cc-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19Th Floor, Air India 1701, 17Th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Ita Nos.2221 To 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14, 2015-16 & 2016-17) Asst. Commissioner Of Vs. Nadiadwala Grandson Income Tax, Central Circle- Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 4(4),Central Range-4 Nadiadwala Villa, Ocean Pr.Cit(C)-2,R.No. 1922, View, Jp Road, Versova, 19Th Floor, Air India Andheri (West), Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400061 Mumbai - 400021 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan/Gir No: Aaccn0909J Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Mani Jain & Prateek Jain Respondent By : Dr. Mahesh Akhade Date Of Hearing 24.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 07.06.2022

For Appellant: Mani Jain &For Respondent: Dr. Mahesh Akhade
Section 132(1)Section 68

…11 Appeals, Nadiadwala Grandson Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4) 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & MS.KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.1492 to 1497/Mum/2021 (A.Ys. 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14 to 2016-17) Nadiadwala Grandson Vs. DCIT, CC-4(4), Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. 19th Floor, Air India 1701, 17th Floor, Lotus Building, Nariman Point, Grandeur, Off Veera Desai Mumbai - 400021 Road, Andheri West, Mumbai – 400053 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN/GIR No: AACCN0909J Appellant .. Respondent ITA Nos.2221 to 2223, 2237 & 2238/Mum…

ACIT, CC -4 (2), Chennai vs. M/S. Kag India Pvt. Ltd., Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 758/CHNY/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.758/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012 - 13 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Kag India Private Limited, Income Tax, No.264/15-1, Sathyanathan Complex, 1St Floor, Velachery Road, Corporate Circle – 4(2), Chennai – 600 034. Tambaram East, Chennai – 600 059. [Pan: Aadck5381Q] (अपीलाथ&/Appellant) ('(थ&/Respondent) अपीलाथ& की ओर से / Appellant By : Mr. P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit '(थ& की ओर से/Respondent By : Mr. Y. Sridhar, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 22.03.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.05.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-8, Chennai, Dated 21.02.2020 For The Assessment Year 2012 - 13. 2. The Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Delayed By 116 Days In Filing The Appeal Due To Outbreak Of Pandemic Covid-19 & Hence, The Delay In Filing The Appeal Is Condoned & Admitted The Appeal For Adjudication.

For Appellant: Mr. P. Sajit Kumar, JCITFor Respondent: Mr. Y. Sridhar, C.A
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 68

…produced before the ld. CIT(A) and the ld. CIT(A) has simply accepted is contrary to the law. It was further submission that the ld. CIT(A) failed to consider the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PCIT v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd. [2019] 412 ITR 161. 6. On the other hand, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has pointed out that the addition made by the Assessing Officer was only on the ground that the assessee has failed to produce confirmation letter from the creditors and he has not discussed anything else in the assessment order. Therefore, once the assessee has produced the confirmation le…

Potent Foods Private Limted, Faridabad vs. ITO Ward-2(1), Faridabad

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 104/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda

For Appellant: Shri Shyam SunderFor Respondent: Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “SMC” : DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA.No.104/Del./2021 Assessment Year 2016-2017 M/s. Potent Foods Pvt. The Income Tax Officer, Ltd., FF-9, Vishnu Ward – 2 (1), FBD Place, Near Neelam vs. C.R. Building, Flyover, Sector 20-B, Faridabad. Faridabad. Haryana. PIN – 121 001 Haryana – 122 001. PAN AAGCP6222N (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Rajiv Saxena, Shri Sumangla Saxena & For Assessee : Shri Shyam Sunder Advocates For Revenue : Shri Om Prakash, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 30.03.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 05.05.2022 ORDER This appeal filed by th…

Hareshgiri Pratapgiri Gaushvami, Bhavnagar vs. ITO, Ward-2(3), Bhavnagar

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2051/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Apr 2022AY 2014-15
For Appellant: Shri Parimalsingh B. Parmar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri S.H. Solanki, Sr. D.R
Section 131Section 131(1)Section 234ASection 271Section 68

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “B” BENCH (Conducted Through Virtual Court) Before: Ms. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member And Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member Assessment Year 2014-15 Hareshgiri Pratapgiri ITO, Gaushvami At- Kukad, Ward-2(3), Vill: Kukad, Darbar Vs Bhavnagar, Street, Ta- Ghodha, Nakubaug, Near Bhavnagar Jashonath Chowk, PAN: ANEPG7019E Bhavanagr-364001 (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Parimalsingh B. Parmar, A.R. Revenue by: Shri S.H. Solanki, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 03-03-2022 Date of pronouncement : 28-04-2022 आदेश/ORDER PER : SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL,…

ACIT Non Corporate Circle-12(1), Chennai vs. M.Sumathy, Chennai

The appeal stand dismissed in terms of our above order

ITA 414/CHNY/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri P. Sajit Kumar (JCIT) – Ld. DRFor Respondent: Shri D. Anand (Advocate)-Ld. AR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…d additions, in our considered opinion, has rightly been deleted by Ld. CIT(A). Accordingly, the impugned order could not be faulted with. 8. The revenue has relied on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Pr.CIT Vs. NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. [412 ITR 161] which is completely on different facts. In that case, the assessee had received share capital / premium and as per field enquiries, the investor entities were found to be non-existent entities. The primary onus as casted u/s 68 could not be discharged by the assessee and the entire transactions were held to be bogus and lacked credibility. The f…

Dy CIT 6(2)(1), Mumbai vs. M/S Chiripal Poly Films Ltd., Mumbai

The appeal is dismissed

ITA 7052/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm

For Appellant: Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr AdvFor Respondent: Shri Nikhil Chaudhary, CIT DR
Section 115JSection 56Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM ITA No. 7052/Mum/2019 (Assessment Year 2013-14) The Asst. Commissioner of Chiripal Poly films Limited Income-tax, Circle 6(1)(1), A-8/A-9, Peninsula Centre, Room no. 504, Dr. S.S. Rao Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Parel, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 012 Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN No. AADCC7403M Assessee by : Shri Tushar Hemani, Sr Adv. Revenue by : Shri Nikhil Chaudhary, CIT DR Date of hearing: 13.01.2022 Date of pronouncement : 12.04.2022 ORDER PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM: 1. This a…

Arvind Hanjarimal Jain, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 31 (2), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 270/MUM/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Amarjit Singh, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Jain DixitFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Jain
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT) “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOs. 267, 268, 269 & 270/MUM/2020 (A.Ys: 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Aravind Hanjarimal Jain v. ACIT – 31(1) 23/26, Vijay Vills Jawahar Nagar Kautilya Bhavan S.V. Road, Goregaon (W) Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai - 400062 Bandra(E), Mumbai - 400051 PAN: AAAPJ9738Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Jain Dixit Department by : Shri Mehul Jain Date of Hearing : 13.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29.03.2022 O R D E R PER S.…

Arvind Hanjarimal Jain, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 31 (2), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 269/MUM/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Mar 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Amarjit Singh, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Jain DixitFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Jain
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT) “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOs. 267, 268, 269 & 270/MUM/2020 (A.Ys: 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Aravind Hanjarimal Jain v. ACIT – 31(1) 23/26, Vijay Vills Jawahar Nagar Kautilya Bhavan S.V. Road, Goregaon (W) Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai - 400062 Bandra(E), Mumbai - 400051 PAN: AAAPJ9738Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Jain Dixit Department by : Shri Mehul Jain Date of Hearing : 13.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29.03.2022 O R D E R PER S.…

Arvind Hanjarimal Jain, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 31 (2), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 268/MUM/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Amarjit Singh, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Jain DixitFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Jain
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT) “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOs. 267, 268, 269 & 270/MUM/2020 (A.Ys: 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Aravind Hanjarimal Jain v. ACIT – 31(1) 23/26, Vijay Vills Jawahar Nagar Kautilya Bhavan S.V. Road, Goregaon (W) Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai - 400062 Bandra(E), Mumbai - 400051 PAN: AAAPJ9738Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Jain Dixit Department by : Shri Mehul Jain Date of Hearing : 13.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29.03.2022 O R D E R PER S.…

Arvind Hanjarimal Jain, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 31 (2), Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 267/MUM/2020[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Mar 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Amarjit Singh, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri Jain DixitFor Respondent: Shri Mehul Jain
Section 132Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 154

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (VIRTUAL COURT) “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOs. 267, 268, 269 & 270/MUM/2020 (A.Ys: 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2012-13) Aravind Hanjarimal Jain v. ACIT – 31(1) 23/26, Vijay Vills Jawahar Nagar Kautilya Bhavan S.V. Road, Goregaon (W) Bandra Kurla Complex Mumbai - 400062 Bandra(E), Mumbai - 400051 PAN: AAAPJ9738Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Jain Dixit Department by : Shri Mehul Jain Date of Hearing : 13.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29.03.2022 O R D E R PER S.…

Mahendra Kumar Agarwal, Hyderabad vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-2(2), Hyderabad

Appeal is dismissed in above terms

ITA 242/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad23 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri A.Mohan Alankamony & Shri S.S.Godara

For Appellant: Shri Y.Ratnakar, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajendra Kumar, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

…ITR 540] (SC) that any explanation or evidence filed during the course of income tax proceedings ought to be examined in the light of human probabilities by removing all blinkers. Their lordships recent decision in PCIT Vs. NRA Iron and Steel Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 412 ITR 161 (SC) also holds that mere filing of documentary evidence does not itself prove genuineness or creditworthiness in an issue pertaining to un-explained cash credits. We keep in mind the foregoing legal parameters and deal with the clinching facts in the instant case. It is an admitted factual position that this assessee is assessed and lives in Hyd…

Shri Syed Sohaib Ali, Bhopal vs. The DCIT - 1 (1), Bhopal

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 221/IND/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore21 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Bhagirath Mal Biyani

For Appellant: Shri N.D. PatwaFor Respondent: Shri Amit Soni, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234Section 271(1)(c)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE (through web-based video conferencing platform) BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI BHAGIRATH MAL BIYANI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 221/Ind/2021 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Shri Syed Sohaib Ali, DCIT,1(1), Bhopal बनाम/ H. No. Ahmedabad Palace, Vs. Kohe Fiza, Bhopal (MP) "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ADHPA4878J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Shri Ashish Goyal अपीलाथ" ओर से /Appellant by : Shri N.D. Patwa ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent by : Shri Amit Soni, Sr. DR 04/03/2022 सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hea…

Jt. CIT (OSD), CC -6 (3), Mumbai vs. Advent Developer Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai

The appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3066/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Mar 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Amarjit Singh, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm (Virtual Court Hearing) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 3066/Mum/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/S Advent Developers Jt. Cit (Osd), Cc-6(3) R. No. 1926, 19Th Floor, Pvt. Ltd. Cts-12A/28A, 12A/29 Tp Air India Bldg, Nariman बिधम/ 33, Advent Atria, Point, Mumbai-400 021 Vs. Chincholi Bunder Road, Malad(W), Mumbai-400 064 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No. Aafca3158H (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant : Shri Vishwas Mehendale, Ld. Ar By प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent : Ms. Shailja Rai, Ld. Dr By सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 02.02.2022 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 16.03.2022 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Kavitha Rajagopal: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Challenges The Impugned Order Dated 23.02.2018 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 54, Mumbai In Short Referred As „Ld. Cit(A)‟ In 2

For Appellant: Shri Vishwas MehendaleFor Respondent: Ms. Shailja Rai, Ld. DR by
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, AM, & Ms. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM (Virtual Court Hearing) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 3066/Mum/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) M/s Advent Developers Jt. CIT (OSD), CC-6(3) R. No. 1926, 19th floor, Pvt. Ltd. CTS-12A/28A, 12A/29 tp Air India Bldg, Nariman बिधम/ 33, Advent Atria, Point, Mumbai-400 021 Vs. Chincholi Bunder Road, Malad(W), Mumbai-400 064 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ PAN No. AAFCA3158H (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant : Shri Vishwas Mehendale, Ld. AR by प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondent…

Sejal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., Surat vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), Surat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 435/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.435/Ahd/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sejal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd, Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), V Ug-4/5 Rangila Park, Ghod Dod Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, S. Road, Surat-395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaqcs 8686 P (Appellant ) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri H.P. Meena– CIT-DR
Section 131Section 131(1)(d)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRIPAWAN SINGH, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.435/AHD/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sejal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd, Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), V UG-4/5 Rangila Park, Ghod Dod Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, s. Road, Surat-395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAQCS 8686 P (Appellant ) (Respondent) Assessee by :Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Respondent by :Shri H.P. Meena– CIT-DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of Hearing : 21/01/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/02/2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER DR…

ITO Ward-4(1)(4), Ahmedabad vs. Valley Comtrade Pvt Ltd ( Earlier Known As Jhawar Comtrade Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad

In the result appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 2034/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddharatha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 2034/Ahd/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2012-2013 I.T.O, M/S. Valley Comtrade Pvt. Ltd., Ward-4(1)(4), Vs. (Earlier Known As Jhawar Comtrade Ahmedabad. Pvt. Ltd.,) C-205, Titanium Square, Near Parsoli Bmw Showroom, Thaltej Chokdi, Ahmedabad-380054. Pan: Aadcs3553N & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 68/Srt/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2012-2013 M/S. Valley Comtrade Pvt. Ltd., I.T.O, (Earlier Known As Jhawar Comtrade Vs. Ward-1(1)(3), Pvt. Ltd.,) Surat. C-205, Titanium Square, Near Parsoli Bmw Showroom, Thaltej Chokdi, Ahmedabad-380054. Pan: Aadcs3553N

For Appellant: Shri Aseem L. Thakkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Vijaykumar Jaiswal, CIT. D.R with Shri S.S. Shukla, Sr.D.R
Section 13(1)(d)Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘’ A’’ BENCH, AHMEDABAD (CONDUCTED THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT AT AHMEDABAD) BEFORE SHRI WASEEM AHMED, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER And SHRI SIDDHARATHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 2034/AHD/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2012-2013 I.T.O, M/s. Valley Comtrade Pvt. Ltd., Ward-4(1)(4), Vs. (Earlier known as Jhawar Comtrade Ahmedabad. Pvt. Ltd.,) C-205, Titanium Square, Near Parsoli BMW Showroom, Thaltej Chokdi, Ahmedabad-380054. PAN: AADCS3553N And आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 68/SRT/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Year:2012-2013 M/s. Valley Comtrade Pvt.…

Anandtex International P.Ltd, Panipat vs. ACIT, Circle, Panipat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2476/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Feb 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri K.Narasimha Chary

Section 143(3)Section 68

…ing Officer is no excuse. Ld. CIT(A), accordingly, upheld the findings of the learned Assessing Officer and confirmed the addition. 9. Ld. DR submitted that the decisions of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of PCIT vs. NRA Iron and Steel (P) Ltd (2019) for 12 ITR 161 (SC) and the decisions of the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the cases of PCIT vs. NDR Promoters Pvt. Ltd. (2019) for 10 ITR 379 (Delhi), CIT vs. NR Portfolio Private Limited (2014) 42 taxmann.com 339 (Delhi), CIT vs. Nova Promoters &Finlease (P) Ltd. 18 taxmann.com 217 etc., are applicable to the facts of the case. 10. We have gone through…

Mirage Ceramics Pvt Ltd., Mumbai vs. ACIT 12(3)(2), Mumbai

In the result appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2630/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Feb 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm & Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am Mirage Ceramics Private Limited The Assistant Commissioner Of 7Th Floor, D Wing, Trade Income Tax World 12(3)(2) Senapati Bapat Marg , Aykar Bhavan Vs. Kamla Mill Compound, M K Road Mumbai -400 013 Mumbai 20 Pan Aaecm2513R (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaafd0295J

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri C T Mathew SR DR
Section 131Section 133Section 143Section 68

…this itself shows that the transaction is not genuine. He further relied on the decision of the learned CIT – A as well as the learned assessing officer. He further relied upon the decision of the honourable Supreme Court in case of NRA Iron and steel Co Ltd 103 Taxmann.com 48 (SC) wherein on identical facts and circumstances the addition made under section 68 by the learned assessing officer was confirmed. 10. We have carefully considered the contentions of the learned departmental representative and perused the orders of the lower authorities. The facts shows that assessee has received a sum of ₹ 7.86 crores f…