(Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.

103 Taxmann.com 48Supreme Court of India2019#76 most cited

What is (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd. authority for?

When assessing cash credits, share capital, or loans, the assessee bears the onus to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions. This burden is not discharged merely by documentary evidence if field inquiries reveal accommodation entries or dealings with paper/shell companies.

696

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 371,887 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2026.

Also referred to as

NRA Iron & Steel · (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel · Section 68 · cash credit · share capital · share application money · unexplained loan · onus of proof · creditworthiness · genuineness of transaction · paper company · shell company · accommodation entries

Sections most often in play

Section 68Section 143(3)Section 147Section 10(38)Section 148Section 69CSection 131Section 133(6)

Issues it is cited on

price riggingbogus share capitalbogus long term capital gainonus of proofpenny stockpaper companypreponderance of probabilitycreditworthiness of the creditorsection 10(38)bogus ltcgshell companysource of source

Judgments citing (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.

Dharamendra Bhandari (HUF), Gurgaon vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3787/DEL/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Oct 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Ms Madhumita Roydharamendra Bhandari (Huf), Vs. Cit(A), A-126, Sushant Lok-1, National Faceless Appeal Gurgaon, Haryana Centre, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan:Aadhd2238J Assessee By : Shri R. S. Ahuja, Ca Shri Pushpdeep Singh, Adv Revenue By: Shri T James Singson, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 02/08/2024 Date Of Pronouncement 28/10/2024

For Appellant: Shri R. S. Ahuja, CAFor Respondent: Shri T James Singson, CIT DR
Section 10(38)Section 143(3)Section 69C

…INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “B”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND MS MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Dharamendra Bhandari (HUF), Vs. CIT(A), A-126, Sushant Lok-1, National Faceless Appeal Gurgaon, Haryana Centre, Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN:AADHD2238J Assessee by : Shri R. S. Ahuja, CA Shri PUshpdeep Singh, Adv Revenue by: Shri T James Singson, CIT DR Date of Hearing 02/08/2024 Date of pronouncement 28/10/2024 O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.: 1. The appeal in ITA No.3787 /Del/2023 for AY 2013-14, arises out of the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC…

Ags Developers Pvt Ltd, Jasola Delhi vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 1 (4), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2185/DEL/2024[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Oct 2024AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat[Assessment Year : 2008-09] Ags Developers Pvt.Ltd., Vs Ito, H.No.47, Pocket Ii, Ward -1(4), Near Appollo Hospital, Jasola, New Delhi. New Delhi-110076. Pan-Aafca1795G Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Sandeep Goel, Adv. Respondent By Shri Siddharth B.S. Meena, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing 04.09.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 18.10.2024

Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI “SMC” BENCH: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER [Assessment Year : 2008-09] AGS Developers Pvt.Ltd., vs ITO, H.No.47, Pocket II, Ward -1(4), Near Appollo Hospital, Jasola, New Delhi. New Delhi-110076. PAN-AAFCA1795G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Sandeep Goel, Adv. Respondent by Shri Siddharth B.S. Meena, Sr.DR Date of Hearing 04.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement 18.10.2024 ORDER PER KUL BHARAT, JM : The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi dated 14.03…

Samarth Lifestyle Retailing Pvt. Ltd., Jaipur vs. DCIT, Circle-6, Jaipur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 621/JPR/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur17 Oct 2024AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Shri P. C. Parwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Nargas, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, जयपुर न्यायपीठ, जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,'A' JAIPUR श्री संदीप गोसाई, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री राठौड कमलेश जयंतभाई, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM आयकर अपील सं./ITA No. 621/JP/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year : 2011-12 Samarth Lifestyle Retailing Private Limited, 601, 6th Floor, Ganga Heights SB-154, Lal Kothi Tonk Road, Jaipur बनाम Vs. DCIT, Circle-06, Jaipur स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआईआर सं./PAN/GIR No.: AAACV 7598 M अपीलार्थी / Appellant प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee by : Shri P.…

Leading Age Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs. ACIT CC 2(2), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1114/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: HeardITAT Mumbai17 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

…PKJ made by the ld. Assessing Officer in the reasons recorded is not justifiable, vitiating the impugned proceedings. 11. In respect of reliance placed by the revenue on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PCIT v. NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. 412 ITR 161 (SC), we note that Hon’ble Supreme Court in para 8.2 of the said decision has made the following observations: Leading Age Developers Pvt. Ltd., AY 2011-12 “8.2 As per settled law, the initial onus is on the Assessee to establish by cogent evidence the genuineness of the transaction, and credit-worthiness of the investors under Section 68 of the…

Leading Age Developers Private Limited, Mumbai vs. Central Circle 2(2), Central Building

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1113/MUM/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Oct 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Vimal Punmiya, CAFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 148Section 153ASection 271(1)(c)Section 68

…PKJ made by the ld. Assessing Officer in the reasons recorded is not justifiable, vitiating the impugned proceedings. 11. In respect of reliance placed by the revenue on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PCIT v. NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. 412 ITR 161 (SC), we note that Hon’ble Supreme Court in para 8.2 of the said decision has made the following observations: Leading Age Developers Pvt. Ltd., AY 2011-12 “8.2 As per settled law, the initial onus is on the Assessee to establish by cogent evidence the genuineness of the transaction, and credit-worthiness of the investors under Section 68 of the…

M/S Arrowspace Tradecom Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-10(2), Kolkata

In the result, in light of the discussion made above, this appeal is dismissed

ITA 344/KOL/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Oct 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Sri Sanjay Garg & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 234BSection 234DSection 271(1)(c)

…aside and the order passed by the CIT(A) dated 28.11.2019 is restored and the substantial questions of law are answered in favour of the revenue.” 5.2. We also draw considerable strength from the case of PCIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P.) Ltd. reported in [2019] 412 ITR 161 (SC) in which share application money was approved for action u/s 68 of the Act even where the share applicants had filed confirmations and attempted to show that the transactions have taken place through normal banking channels, etc. in this case, the Hon'ble Apex Court has dealt with the issue from legal perspective and sum of the passages dese…

Bhavana Lalit Jain, Navi Mumbai vs. Income Tax Officer, WD-15(1)(1), Mumbai

The appeals are allowed

ITA 1016/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shriraj Kumar Chauhan, Jm

Section 10Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 68

…A Y : 2014–15 Bhavna Lalit Jain Versus Income Tax Officer, Mumbai IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND SHRIRAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JM ITA No. A.Y.2014-15 1016/MUM/2024 Mrs. Bhavna Lalit Jain The Income Tax Plot number 21, Officer Maharashtra sector 1A Ward – 15 (1) (1) Vs. Koper Khairane Aayakar Bhavan Maharashtra 400708 Maharishi Karve Road New Marine Lines Mumbai 400020 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN ACIPJ0205E Assessee by Shri Prakash G. Jhunjhunwala Revenue by Shri Ashok Kumar Ambastha, Sr. (DR), 25th August, 2024 Date of hearing 15th October 2024 Date of…

Amit Sajjan Kumar Gupta, Mumbai vs. DCIT 8(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1378/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai10 Oct 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale & Shri Girish Agrawalamitsajjankumargupta, Dcit-8(2)(1), 110, Ashirwad, Roomno.624, बनाम/ Ahmedabad Street, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Carnac Bunder, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400009. Mumbai-400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Abrpg2852N (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Ravikant Pathak.Ar Revenue By : Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing 08/08/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 10/10/2024 आदेश / Order Per Pavan Kumar Gadale - Jm: The Appeal Is Filed By The Assesse Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi / Cit(A) Passed U/Sec 143(3) & U/Sec 250 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Learned Cit (A) Nfac, Erred In Confirming Order Made U/S. 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 Which Is Bad In Law, Ultra Vires & Without Appreciating The Facts, Submission & Evidences In The Proper Perspective, Without Providing Copies Of Material Used Against The Appellant & Without Providing Opportunity Of Cross Examination, Is Liable To Be Annulled.

For Appellant: Shri Ravikant Pathak.ARFor Respondent: Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AmitSajjanKumarGupta, DCIT-8(2)(1), 110, Ashirwad, RoomNo.624, बनाम/ Ahmedabad Street, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Carnac Bunder, M.K.Road, Mumbai-400009. Mumbai-400020. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : ABRPG2852N (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Ravikant Pathak.AR Revenue by : Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing 08/08/2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement 10/10/2024 आदेश / ORDER PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE -…

Navnita Dealcomm Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. I.T.O., Ward - 6(3), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1369/KOL/2024[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata09 Oct 2024AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 131Section 143(1)Section 68

…the share applicant to draw the adverse inference treating share application as unexplained share investment. We also note that the department has merely harped on the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of PCIT v. NRA Iron & Steel Pvt. Ltd. (2019) 412 ITR 161 (SC) and Grafton Merchant Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT ITA No. 230/Kol/2023 A.Y. 2010-11which are distinguishable on facts. In the first case, the Ld. CIT(A) has conducted a very extensive enquiry whereas in the present case, the AO merely issued notice u/s 131 of the Act to the assessee to produce the managing director of the subscriber company with certain…

Banwari Purshottam Bhargav, Andheri West Mumbai vs. ITO 24(1)(3), Piramal Chamber, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2182/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai09 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhanassessment Year 2014-15 Banwari Purshottam Bhargav, Income Tax Officer-24(1)(3), Flat No. 202, Panch Amrut, Piramal Chamber, Panch Complex, Off. Yari Road, Vs. Lalbaug, Versova, Andheri West, Mumbai Mumbai Pan : Aabpb7453M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Vimal Punmiya, Revenue By: Shri Ashok Kumar Ambastha, Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 11/07/2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 09/10/2024

For Appellant: Shri Vimal PunmiyaFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar Ambastha, Sr.DR
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 133(6)Section 68Section 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “B” BENCH : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year 2014-15 Banwari Purshottam Bhargav, Income Tax Officer-24(1)(3), Flat No. 202, Panch Amrut, Piramal Chamber, Panch Complex, Off. Yari Road, vs. Lalbaug, Versova, Andheri West, Mumbai Mumbai PAN : AABPB7453M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Vimal Punmiya, Revenue by: Shri Ashok Kumar Ambastha, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 11/07/2024 Date of Pronouncement : 09/10/2024 PER B.R. BASKARAN, A.M : The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the…

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1 Kolkata vs. M/S Brightstar Vincom Pvt Ltd

The appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect

ITAT/225/2024HC Calcutta04 Oct 2024

Bench: :

Section 260ASection 68

…1 OD-19 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [INCOME TAX] ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/225/2024 IA NO: GA/1/2024 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 KOLKATA VS M/S BRIGHTSTAR VINCOM PVT. LTD. BEFORE : THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE BIVAS PATTANAYAK Date : 4th October, 2024 Appearance : Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Adv. Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv. …for the appellant. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. Ms. Alisha Das, Adv. Mr. S. Bhowmick, Adv Mr. Samrat Das, Adv. Ms. Elina Dey, Adv. Mr. S.N. Banerjee, Adv. …for the respondent. T…

Balhanuman Commodeal Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-5(4), Kolkata

ITA 116/KOL/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata03 Oct 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Rakesh Mishraassessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR
Section 131Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 250Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 Balhanuman Commodeal Pvt. I.T.O., Ward-5(4), Kolkata, Ltd., Aaykar Bhawan, P-7, 7, Red Cross Place, 4th Floor, Vs Chowringhee Square, Kolkata - 700001 Kolkata - 700069 (PAN: AAECB5704H) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : None Respondent by : Shri Vineet Kumar, Addl. CIT, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 08.07.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 03.10.2024 O R D E R PER RAKESH MISHRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is against t…

Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai vs. Keshavji Nongha Shah, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 862/MUM/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Sunil Kumar Singhassessment Year : 2014-15 Asst.Commissioner Of Income Keshavji Nongha Shah, Tax, M/S. Ankur Harganga Mahal, Piramal Chambers, Vs. Khodad Circle, Dadar T.T., Lalbaug, Mumbai Mumbai. Pan : Aaeps6097B (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Nishit Gandhi, For Revenue : Shri P.D. Chougule,(Addl.Cit) Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 16-07-2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 01-10-2024 Order Per B.R. Baskaran, A.M :

For Appellant: Shri Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Shri P.D. Chougule,(Addl.CIT) Sr.DR
Section 10(38)Section 131Section 133(6)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “E” BENCH : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SUNIL KUMAR SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2014-15 Asst.Commissioner of Income Keshavji Nongha Shah, Tax, M/s. Ankur Harganga Mahal, Piramal Chambers, vs. Khodad Circle, Dadar T.T., Lalbaug, Mumbai Mumbai. PAN : AAEPS6097B (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : Shri Nishit Gandhi, For Revenue : Shri P.D. Chougule,(Addl.CIT) Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 16-07-2024 Date of Pronouncement : 01-10-2024 ORDER PER B.R. BASKARAN, A.M : The Revenue has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 0…

Anju Chirania, Mumbai vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward - 4(1)(3), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3158/MUM/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Sept 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Judicialmember & Shri Girish Agrawalanju Chirania, Vs. Ito, Ward –4(1)(3), 301, Sona Chambers, Room No. 637, 507/509, Jss Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Chira Bazar, Marine Lines, M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 002. Mumbai-400020. Pan/Gir No. Afcpc9073Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 133(6)Section 147Section 148Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, “A” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIALMEMBER & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Anju Chirania, Vs. ITO, Ward –4(1)(3), 301, Sona Chambers, Room No. 637, 507/509, JSS Road, Aayakar Bhavan, Chira bazar, Marine Lines, M.K.Road, Mumbai – 400 002. Mumbai-400020. PAN/GIR No. AFCPC9073Q (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Appellant by Ms.Ritu Kamal Kishore & Shri.Ravi Ganatra. AR Respondent by Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha.Sr.DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing 07.08.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement 25.09.2024 ORDER PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM: The as…

Prakash Govindbhai Patel, Ahmedabad vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the assessee appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 163/AHD/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT D.R. & Shri Rignesh
Section 143(1)Section 144Section 148Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. Nos.161 to 163/Ahd/2023 (Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2012-13) Prakash Govindbhai Patel, Vs. Income Tax Officer, “Kamal Shanti”, Nr. Sardar Patel Ward-6(1)(1), Under Bridge, Sardar Patel Colony Ahmedabad Ahmedabad-380014 [PAN No.ATQPP6754P] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT D.R. & Shri Rignesh K Das, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing 12.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement 23.09.2024 O R D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUT…

Prakash Govindbhai Patel, Ahmedabad vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the assessee appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 162/AHD/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Sept 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT D.R. & Shri Rignesh
Section 143(1)Section 144Section 148Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. Nos.161 to 163/Ahd/2023 (Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2012-13) Prakash Govindbhai Patel, Vs. Income Tax Officer, “Kamal Shanti”, Nr. Sardar Patel Ward-6(1)(1), Under Bridge, Sardar Patel Colony Ahmedabad Ahmedabad-380014 [PAN No.ATQPP6754P] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT D.R. & Shri Rignesh K Das, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing 12.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement 23.09.2024 O R D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUT…

Prakash Govindbhai Patel, Ahmedabad vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-6(1)(1), Ahmedabad

In the result, the assessee appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 161/AHD/2023[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal & Shri Makarand V. Mahadeokar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT D.R. & Shri Rignesh
Section 143(1)Section 144Section 148Section 69A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD BEFORE SHRI SIDDHARTHA NAUTIYAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI MAKARAND V. MAHADEOKAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. Nos.161 to 163/Ahd/2023 (Assessment Years: 2010-11 to 2012-13) Prakash Govindbhai Patel, Vs. Income Tax Officer, “Kamal Shanti”, Nr. Sardar Patel Ward-6(1)(1), Under Bridge, Sardar Patel Colony Ahmedabad Ahmedabad-380014 [PAN No.ATQPP6754P] (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Appellant by : None Respondent by: Shri R.N. Dsouza, CIT D.R. & Shri Rignesh K Das, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing 12.09.2024 Date of Pronouncement 23.09.2024 O R D E R PER SIDDHARTHA NAUT…

Zula Merchandisc Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-5(1), Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 553/KOL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar]

Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, कोलकाता पीठ “ए’’, कोलकाता IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH: KOLKATA "ी राजपाल यादव, उपा"य" एबं "ी राजेश कुमार, लेखा सद"य के सम" [Before Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member] I.T.A. No. 553/Kol/2024 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Zulu Merchandise Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward-5(1), Kolkata (PAN: AAACZ 1156 D) ( अपीलाथ" ) Respondent / (""यथ") Appellant / Date of Hearing / सुनवाई 26.06.2024 क" "त"थ Date of Pronouncement/ 23.09.2024 आदेश उ"घोषणा क" "त"थ For the Appellant/ Shri S. K. Pransukha, FCA "नधा"रती क" ओर से For the Respondent/ Shri B. K. Singh, Addl…

Silverlake Traders Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-5(1), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 379/KOL/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata23 Sept 2024AY 2009-10

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Sri Sanjay Awasthi

Section 14ASection 263Section 68

…aside and the order passed by the CIT(A) dated 28.11.2019 is restored and the substantial questions of law are answered in favour of the revenue.” 5.2. We also draw considerable strength from the case of PCIT vs. NRA Iron & Steel (P.) Ltd. reported in [2019] 412 ITR 161 (SC) in which share application money was approved for action u/s 68 of the Act even where the share applicants had filed confirmations and attempted to show that the transactions have taken place through normal banking channels, etc. In this case, the Hon'ble Apex Court has dealt with the issue from a legal perspective and some of the passages d…

DCIT 27 (2), Mumbai, Navi Mumbai vs. Narayan Tatu Rane, Chembur

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4716/MUM/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Raj Kumar Chauhan

For Appellant: Shri Rashmikant C. Modi &For Respondent: Shri Ashok Kumar Ambastha
Section 143(1)Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “B” BENCH : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAJ KUMAR CHAUHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No. A.Y. Appellant Respondent Narayan Tatu Rane, 4668/Mum/2023 2011-12 DCIT-27(2), HUF, 4th Floor, 9/031, A Wing, Tower No.6, Ganga Estates, Vashi Railway Atur Park, Station Complex, 5th Road, Vashi, Chembur, 4716/Mum/2023 2012-13 Navi Mumbai Mumbai PAN: AABHN4306D For Assessee : Shri Rashmikant C. Modi & Ms. Ketki Rajeshirke, For Revenue : Shri Ashok Kumar Ambastha, Sr.DR Date of Hearing : 11-07-2024 Date of Pronouncement : 19-09-2024 ORDER PER B.R. BASKA…