Late Sh. Birdi Chand Through Legal Heir Mukesh Sharma, Jaipur vs. ITO, Ward-7(2), Jaipur
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 502/JPR/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur09 Apr 2024AY 2012-13
Bench: DR. S. SEETHALAKSHMI (Judicial Member), SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI (Accountant Member)
For Appellant: Shri P.C. Parwal (C.A.)For Respondent: Shri Anup Singh (Addl.CIT)
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 292BSection 54F
…cited on behalf of revenue, namely, Yeshwantrao v. The Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Bangalore, AIR 1967 SC 135 at pages 140, 141 para 18: [1966] Suppl. SCR 419 at 429 A- B, C.A. Abraham v. The Income Tax Officer, Kottayam, AIR 1961 SC 609 at 612 para 6: [1961] 2 SCR 765 at page 771, The State of Tamil Nadu v. M.K. Kandaswami, AIR 1975 SC 1871 (para 26): [1975] 4 SCC 745 (para 26), Commissioner of Sales Tax, Delhi v. Shri Krishna Engineering Co., [2005] 2 SCC 695, pages 702, 703 paras 19 to 23, all enunciate principles dealing with tax evasion in the context of construing provisions which are designed to prevent ta…