CBDT (pages48 SOT 178 (Visakhapatnam) ITO v. UAN Raju Construction

31 DTR 49High Court#24400 most cited
3

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2017.

Judgments citing CBDT (pages48 SOT 178 (Visakhapatnam) ITO v. UAN Raju Construction

M/S. Dayanand Contractor, Rohtak vs. Pr.CIT, Rohtak

In the result, original

ITA 2807/DEL/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Kumar Kamal & Lalit MohanFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 263

…d.) M/s Hindustan Ratna JV vs.ITO vi) (pages 73-84 of Paper Book) 20 ITA.No.2806 & 2807/Del./2016 M/s. Dayanand, Contractor, V & PO Kharainti, Dist. Rohtak. vii) Circular No.7/2016 issued by CBDT (pages48 SOT 178 (Visakhapatnam) ITO vs. UAN Raju Construction 31 DTR 49 (HP) CIT vs. Ambuja Daria 48 DTR 130(HP) CIT vs. Sirmour Truck Operators Union vii) 240 CTR 325 (P&H) CIT vs. Grewal Brothers viii) 248 ITR 339 (AAR) Van Oord ACZ BV ix) 124 ITR 192 (Bom) CIT vs. British Drug Houses (India)P. Ltd x) ITA No(s) 1280/PN/2006 (A.Y. 2003-04), 60/PN/2009 (A.Y. xi) 2005-06), 177 and 178/PN/2008 (A.Y. 2002-03 and 2004-05…

M/S. Dayanand Contractor, Rohtak vs. Pr.CIT, Rohtak

In the result, original

ITA 2806/DEL/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Nov 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

For Appellant: Kumar Kamal & Lalit MohanFor Respondent: Ms. Rachna Singh, CIT-D.R
Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 263

…d.) M/s Hindustan Ratna JV vs.ITO vi) (pages 73-84 of Paper Book) 20 ITA.No.2806 & 2807/Del./2016 M/s. Dayanand, Contractor, V & PO Kharainti, Dist. Rohtak. vii) Circular No.7/2016 issued by CBDT (pages48 SOT 178 (Visakhapatnam) ITO vs. UAN Raju Construction 31 DTR 49 (HP) CIT vs. Ambuja Daria 48 DTR 130(HP) CIT vs. Sirmour Truck Operators Union vii) 240 CTR 325 (P&H) CIT vs. Grewal Brothers viii) 248 ITR 339 (AAR) Van Oord ACZ BV ix) 124 ITR 192 (Bom) CIT vs. British Drug Houses (India)P. Ltd x) ITA No(s) 1280/PN/2006 (A.Y. 2003-04), 60/PN/2009 (A.Y. xi) 2005-06), 177 and 178/PN/2008 (A.Y. 2002-03 and 2004-05…

M/S. Dayanand Contractor, Rohtak vs. ITO, Rohtak

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2027/DEL/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Oct 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri B.P. Jain

For Appellant: Shri Gautam Jain, & Sh. Lalit Mohan, CAFor Respondent: Shri T. Vasanthan Sr. DR
Section 144A

…CIT vs. OrientalStructural Engineers(P) Ltd. v) (pages 55-57 of Paper Book) 166 TTJ 612 (Hyd.) M/s Hindustan Ratna JV vs.ITO vi) (pages 73-84 of Paper Book) Circular No.7/2016 issued by CBDT (pages48 SOT 178 vii) (Visakhapatnam) ITO vs. UAN Raju Construction 31 DTR 49 (HP) CIT vs. Ambuja Daria Kashlog Mangu Transport Coop Society 48 DTR 130(HP) CIT vs. Sirmour Truck Operators Union viii) 240 CTR 325 (P&H) CIT vs. Grewal Brothers ix) 248 ITR 339 (AAR) Van Oord ACZ BV x) 124 ITR 192 (Bom) CIT vs. British Drug Houses (India)P. Ltd xi) ITA No(s) 1280/PN/2006 (A.Y. 2003-04), 60/PN/2009 (A.Y. xii) 2005-06), 177 and 17…

CBDT (pages48 SOT 178 (Visakhapatnam) ITO v. UAN Raju Construction (31 DTR 49) — Cited in 3 Judgments | BharatTax