Canyon Financial Services Ltd. v. ITO
399 ITR 202High Court2017#2312 most cited
What is Canyon Financial Services Ltd. v. ITO authority for?
Proceedings under Section 153C are invalid if the Assessing Officer records a mechanical satisfaction note without proper application of mind, regarding seized material belonging to or pertaining to a person other than the searched person.
50
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.
Also referred to as
Canyon Financial Services Ltd. v. ITO · Section 153C · satisfaction note · mechanical satisfaction note · non-application of mind · validity of 153C proceedings · documents seized · assessment of other person · search assessment
Also reported as
84 Taxmann.com 71253 Taxmann 341