Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT

85 Taxmann.com 354Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2017#6761 most cited

What is Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

Expenses incurred by a taxpayer for payments to doctors are not disallowable under section 37(1) if they are business expenditures and not violative of MCI guidelines.

17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2024.

Also referred to as

Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT · section 37(1) · MCI Regulations · business expenditure · disallowance · CBDT Circular No. 5 of 2012

Judgments citing Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT

Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ACIT (85 Taxmann.com 354) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax