Bir Bahadur Singh Sijwali v. ITO

53 Taxmann.com 366High Court2015#1394 most cited

What is Bir Bahadur Singh Sijwali v. ITO authority for?

For reassessment under Section 147, merely finding deposits in a savings bank account is not sufficient 'reason to believe' for the Assessing Officer. The officer must specifically record reasons demonstrating that income has escaped assessment to validly issue a notice under Section 148.

82

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Bir Bahadur Singh Sijwali v. ITO · 53 Taxmann.com 366 · Section 147 · Section 148 · reason to believe · reassessment notice validity · mere bank deposits · income escapement · sufficiency of reasons · ITAT Delhi Bench

Sections most often in play

Section 147Section 148Section 143(3)Section 133(6)Section 144Section 68Section 69ASection 143(2)

Issues it is cited on

undisclosed foreign income and assetssection 149(1)(c)section 4(2)section 201(3)section 158basection 150unexplained jewellerysection 70beyond four yearssection 18section 149(1)(b)statement under section 132(4)

Judgments citing Bir Bahadur Singh Sijwali v. ITO

K.Suresh, Chennai vs. DCIT, Chennai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 569/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT
Section 148

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHENNAI "ी चं" पूजार", लेखा सद"य एवं "ी जी. पवन कुमार, "या"यक सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos. 568 to 572/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2008-09 to 2012-13 Mr. K. Suresh, The Deputy Commissioner of Old No.12A, New No.24, v. Income-tax, Swarna Mangalam, East Road, Non-Corporate Ward-2, West CIT Nagar, Nandanam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 035. (""यथ"/Respondent) PAN AOBPS4696F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" क" ओर /Appellant by :…

K.Suresh, Chennai vs. DCIT, Chennai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 568/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Jun 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

For Appellant: Shri K. Ravi, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Supriyo Pal, JCIT
Section 148

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, ‘बी’ "यायपीठ, चे"नई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHENNAI "ी चं" पूजार", लेखा सद"य एवं "ी जी. पवन कुमार, "या"यक सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos. 568 to 572/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2008-09 to 2012-13 Mr. K. Suresh, The Deputy Commissioner of Old No.12A, New No.24, v. Income-tax, Swarna Mangalam, East Road, Non-Corporate Ward-2, West CIT Nagar, Nandanam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 035. (""यथ"/Respondent) PAN AOBPS4696F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) अपीलाथ" क" ओर /Appellant by :…