Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT

145 Taxmann.com 331High Court2022#4965 most cited

What is Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

The assessee is entitled to claim a deduction under section 80M of the Act for dividend income received from shares, where such income was chargeable to tax in their hands.

23

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2024 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT · section 80M · dividend income · deduction · chargeable to tax

Sections most often in play

Section 115JBSection 115USection 14ASection 244ASection 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 36(1)(viii)

Issues it is cited on

section 50(1)section 80absection 54esection 70(2)section 10(15)section 80msection 10(33)section 14a(1)section 54eclong-term capital assetsection 36(1)(viii)section 111a

Judgments citing Biocon Ltd. v. DCIT

Hdfc Bank Limited (As Successor to Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd), Mumbai vs. The Addl CIT RG 1(1), Mumbai

ITA 4315/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2002-2003

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.4315 and 4316/MUM/2007 Assessment Years: 2002-03 and 2003-04 ITA Nos.3861 and 3862/Mum/2009 Assessment Years: 2004-05 and 2005-06 ITA Nos.5033/Mum/2010, 5442/Mum/2011, 2868/Mum/2012 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2008-09 ITA Nos.2093, 5885, 2609, 2610 and 4983/Mum/2017 Assessment Years: 2009-10 to 2013-14 ITA Nos.2665 and 2666/Mum/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 and 2015-16 ITA Nos.1890, 1891, 1892, 1893 and 3717/Mum/2023 and Assessment Years: 201…

DCIT Cir 1(1), Mumbai vs. M/S Housing Developement Finance Corporation Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeals of both, assessee and revenue are decided

ITA 4161/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Jan 2025AY 2002-2003

Bench: Shri Anikesh Banerjee & Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Joshi, Advocate and
Section 1

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.4315 and 4316/MUM/2007 Assessment Years: 2002-03 and 2003-04 ITA Nos.3861 and 3862/Mum/2009 Assessment Years: 2004-05 and 2005-06 ITA Nos.5033/Mum/2010, 5442/Mum/2011, 2868/Mum/2012 Assessment Years: 2006-07 to 2008-09 ITA Nos.2093, 5885, 2609, 2610 and 4983/Mum/2017 Assessment Years: 2009-10 to 2013-14 ITA Nos.2665 and 2666/Mum/2024 Assessment Years: 2014-15 and 2015-16 ITA Nos.1890, 1891, 1892, 1893 and 3717/Mum/2023 and Assessment Years: 201…

Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(1), Ahmedabad vs. Astral Limited, Ahmedabad

In the result, ground number 2 of the Department’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 921/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad04 Jun 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: The First Appellate Authority Which Has Been Decided By The Ld. Cit(A) Vide The Impugned Order. The Revenue Is In Appeal Us Before Us.

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Pratik Sharma, Sr. D.R
Section 143(3)Section 144C(3)Section 14ASection 92C

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH Before: Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal, Judicial Member And Shri Narendra Prasad Sinha, Accountant Member Assessment Year 2018-19 The DCIT, Astral Limited Central Circle-1(1), 207/1, Astral House, Ahmedabad Vs B/H Rajpath Club (Appellant) Off S.G. Highway, Ahmedabad-380059 PAN: AABCA2951N (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Vartik Choksi, A.R. Revenue by: Shri Pratik Sharma, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing : 22-05-2024 Date of pronouncement : 04-06-2024 आदेश/ORDER PER : NARENDRA PRASAD SINHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:- This appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order…