SANTOSH MAHALINGAM,GHAZIABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, NEW DELHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 283/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Aug 2022AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri Tarvinder Singh Kapoor & Shri Chandra Mohan Garg[Assessment Year : 2014-15] Santosh Mahalingam, Vs Acit, No.1, Santosh Nagar, Pratap Central Circle-6, Vihar, Ghaziabad-201009. New Delhi. Pan-Cjkps5766C Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri S.K.Gupta, Ca Respondent By Shri H.K.Choudhary, Cit. Dr Date Of Hearing 30.06.2022 Date Of Pronouncement 03.08.2022
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)
…f, which is sine qua non u/s 143(2) of the Act which uses the phrase “if considers it necessary or expedient”, and on expression “considers it necessary” we draw our kind attention to Hon’ble Apex Court decision in case of Bhikubhai Patel vs State of Gujarat (4 SCC 144) relevant extract of which is reproduced below for sake of ready reference (which directly fits in extant facts to support proposition put forth): “…24. Proviso opens with the words where the State Government is of opinion that substantial modifications in the draft development plan and regulations are necessary..These words are indicative of the s…