Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. v. ACIT T20171

79 Taxmann.com 325High Court2017#6721 most cited

What is Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. v. ACIT T20171 authority for?

The presumption under section 132(4A) regarding seized documents is not confined to search and seizure proceedings but extends to regular assessments, and an assessee must produce other evidence to disprove entries in seized loose sheets.

17

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2021.

Also referred to as

Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd v ACIT · section 132(4A) · section 158BH · presumption · seized documents · loose sheets · regular assessment · ownership of seized assets

Also reported as

282 CTR 209

Judgments citing Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. v. ACIT T20171

Bhagheeratha Engineering Ltd. v. ACIT T20171 (79 Taxmann.com 325) — Cited in 17 Judgments | BharatTax