Aquatech Systems (Asia) Pvt. Ltd., Pune vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax
In the result, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 416/PUN/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Pune18 Jun 2018AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri Anil Chaturvedi, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm
For Appellant: Shri Neelesh KhandelwalFor Respondent: Dr. Vivek Aggarwal
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274
…ons of the Act or Income Tax Rules. To further buttress his submissions the ld. DR placed reliance on the following decisions : i. Shyam Biri Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 259 ITR 625 (All); ii. Becker Gray And Co. Ltd. Vs. ITO And Ors., 112 ITR 503 (Cal); iii. Dr. Syamal Baran Mondal Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax in Income Tax Appeal No. 698 of 2007 decided on 18-02-2011 (Cal); iv. M. Sajjanraj Nahar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 283 ITR 230 (Mad); v. M.S. Mohammed Marzook (Late) And Another Vs. ITO, 283 ITR 254 (Mad); vi. M/s. Maharaj Garage & Company Vs. Commissioner of Income Ta…