Banwari Debi Vs 1TO 1964 53 ITR 100, 105 SC) CIT v. Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd.

68 ITR 227Supreme Court of India#21237 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 348,631 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2018.

Judgments citing Banwari Debi Vs 1TO 1964 53 ITR 100, 105 SC) CIT v. Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd.

ITO, New Delhi vs. Sh. Vishnu Goel, Delhi

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3932/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

…e into account even facts and circumstances and changes in law which happened after the AO completed the assessment (Banwari Debi Vs 1TO 1964 53 ITR 100, 105 SC) CIT Vs Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd 1961 41 ITR 280, 290 (SC), Straw Products Ltd Vs ITO 1968 68 ITR 227 (SC). Kalaratic Devi Harlalka vs CIT (1967 66 ITR 680 SC), Ram PyafiDevi Sarogi vs CIT 1968 67 ITR 84(SC), Sankappa (s) v ITO 1968 68 ITR 760 (SC) Raja Bahadur Vs CIT 1954 26 ITR 563-570, 571 (Pat). State Raja Syed Mohammed Saddat Ali Khan 1961 41 ITR 737 (SC), CIT Vs Straw Products Ltd 1966 60 ITR 156(SC), Madeva Upendra Sinai Vs UOI - 1975 98 IT…

ITO, New Delhi vs. Sh. Vishnu Goel, Delhi

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3931/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

…e into account even facts and circumstances and changes in law which happened after the AO completed the assessment (Banwari Debi Vs 1TO 1964 53 ITR 100, 105 SC) CIT Vs Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd 1961 41 ITR 280, 290 (SC), Straw Products Ltd Vs ITO 1968 68 ITR 227 (SC). Kalaratic Devi Harlalka vs CIT (1967 66 ITR 680 SC), Ram PyafiDevi Sarogi vs CIT 1968 67 ITR 84(SC), Sankappa (s) v ITO 1968 68 ITR 760 (SC) Raja Bahadur Vs CIT 1954 26 ITR 563-570, 571 (Pat). State Raja Syed Mohammed Saddat Ali Khan 1961 41 ITR 737 (SC), CIT Vs Straw Products Ltd 1966 60 ITR 156(SC), Madeva Upendra Sinai Vs UOI - 1975 98 IT…

ITO, New Delhi vs. Sh. Vishnu Goel, Delhi

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3930/DEL/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

…e into account even facts and circumstances and changes in law which happened after the AO completed the assessment (Banwari Debi Vs 1TO 1964 53 ITR 100, 105 SC) CIT Vs Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd 1961 41 ITR 280, 290 (SC), Straw Products Ltd Vs ITO 1968 68 ITR 227 (SC). Kalaratic Devi Harlalka vs CIT (1967 66 ITR 680 SC), Ram PyafiDevi Sarogi vs CIT 1968 67 ITR 84(SC), Sankappa (s) v ITO 1968 68 ITR 760 (SC) Raja Bahadur Vs CIT 1954 26 ITR 563-570, 571 (Pat). State Raja Syed Mohammed Saddat Ali Khan 1961 41 ITR 737 (SC), CIT Vs Straw Products Ltd 1966 60 ITR 156(SC), Madeva Upendra Sinai Vs UOI - 1975 98 IT…

ITO, New Delhi vs. Sh. Vishnu Goel, Delhi

In the result appeal filed by the learned assessing officer are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3929/DEL/2015[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2018AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Kuldip Singh & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Shivir Bajaj, CAFor Respondent: Shri S.S.Rana, CIT DR
Section 133Section 133ASection 271

…e into account even facts and circumstances and changes in law which happened after the AO completed the assessment (Banwari Debi Vs 1TO 1964 53 ITR 100, 105 SC) CIT Vs Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd 1961 41 ITR 280, 290 (SC), Straw Products Ltd Vs ITO 1968 68 ITR 227 (SC). Kalaratic Devi Harlalka vs CIT (1967 66 ITR 680 SC), Ram PyafiDevi Sarogi vs CIT 1968 67 ITR 84(SC), Sankappa (s) v ITO 1968 68 ITR 760 (SC) Raja Bahadur Vs CIT 1954 26 ITR 563-570, 571 (Pat). State Raja Syed Mohammed Saddat Ali Khan 1961 41 ITR 737 (SC), CIT Vs Straw Products Ltd 1966 60 ITR 156(SC), Madeva Upendra Sinai Vs UOI - 1975 98 IT…

Banwari Debi Vs 1TO 1964 53 ITR 100, 105 SC) CIT v. Dewan Bahadur Ramgopal Mills Ltd. (68 ITR 227) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax