Bannalal Jat Constructions Pvt Ltd (supra), Avadh Kishore Das v. Ram Gopal in AIR 1979 SC 861, Sudharshan Amin vs ACIT

35 Taxmann.com 370High Court2013#3107 most cited

What is Bannalal Jat Constructions Pvt Ltd (supra), Avadh Kishore Das v. Ram Gopal in AIR 1979 SC 861, Sudharshan Amin vs ACIT authority for?

Retraction of a statement recorded under oath during a search is not accepted unless supported by strong and contemporaneous evidence, especially when corroborative documents and seized materials support the additions.

38

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Bannalal Jat Constructions Pvt Ltd · Avadh Kishore Das v. Ram Gopal · Sudharshan Amin vs ACIT · retraction of statement · statement under section 132(4) · evidentiary value of statement · contemporaneous evidence · search and seizure

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Bannalal Jat Constructions Pvt Ltd (supra), Avadh Kishore Das v. Ram Gopal in AIR 1979 SC 861, Sudharshan Amin vs ACIT

Dy CIT, CC- 7(3), Mumbai vs. M/S. Macrotech Developer Ltd.(Since Lodha Estae P. Ltd. Merged With Macrotech Developers Ltd.), Mumbai

ITA 1658/MUM/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai11 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar () & Shri Ravish Sood () Deputy Commissioner Of Income- M/S Macrotech Developer Ltd. Tax Cc-7(3), Room No. 655, Vs. (Since Lodha Estate Pvt. Ltd. Merged With Macrotech Developer Ltd.), Aaykar Bhawan, M.K Road, 412, 17G, Vardhman Chamber, Mumbai – 400 020 Cawasji Patel Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001. Pan No. Aaacl1723E (Revenue) (Assessee) Assessee By : Shri Niraj Sheth, A.R Revenue By : Shri. Rahul Raman, Cit D.R Date Of Hearing: 05/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 11/10/2021 Order Per Ravish Sood, J.M: The Captioned Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Cit(A)-49, Mumbai, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The A.O U/S 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Short „Act‟) Dated 29.12.2017 For A.Y 2015-16. The Revenue Has Assailed The Order Of The Cit(A) On The Following Effective Grounds Before Us : “1. Whether On The Facts & The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs. 5,26,52,120/- Made By The Assessing Officer U/S 36(1)(Iii) Of The I.T Act. 2. Whether On The Facts & The Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, The Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Of Rs. 2,02,86,452/- Towards Sales Promotion Expense & Rs. 6,68,13,114/- On Account Of Advertisement Expenses Made By The Assessing Officer By Capitalizing The Same To The Work-In-Progress.” 2. Briefly Stated, The Assessee Company That Was Merged With M/S Lodha Developers Limited (Now Known As Macrotech Developers Limited) Is Engaged In The Business Of Construction & Development Of Real Estate. Return Of Income For A.Y 2015-16 Was E-Filed By The Assessee On 31.08.2015, Declaring A Loss

For Appellant: Shri Niraj Sheth, A.RFor Respondent: Shri. Rahul Raman, CIT D.R
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(iii)

…ITA No. 1658/Mum/2020 – A.Y 2015-16 1 Dy. CIT Vs. M/s Macrotech Developer Ltd. IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “B” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR (VICE PRESIDENT) AND SHRI RAVISH SOOD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) Deputy Commissioner of Income- M/s Macrotech Developer Ltd. tax CC-7(3), Room No. 655, Vs. (Since Lodha Estate Pvt. Ltd. merged with Macrotech Developer Ltd.), Aaykar Bhawan, M.K Road, 412, 17G, Vardhman Chamber, Mumbai – 400 020 Cawasji Patel Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001. PAN No. AAACL1723E (Revenue) (Assessee) Assessee by : Shri Niraj Sheth, A.R Revenue by : Shri. Rahul Raman, CIT D.R Date o…