Bangalore in D T S Rao v. ACIT

106 ITD 569Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2007#16434 most cited
5

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 346,713 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2022.

Judgments citing Bangalore in D T S Rao v. ACIT

M/S.Balaji Bullion & Commodities (India) Private Limited, Mumbai vs. DCIT Central Circle-40, Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 1291/MUM/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm Balaji Bullion & Commodities The Dy. Commissioner Of (India) Private Limited Income–Tax, 118/120, 3Rd Floor, Ashoka Central Circle–40, Vs. House Zavri Baazar, Mumbai Mumbai-400 002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aadcbo236F Balaji Universal Tradelinks P. The Dy. Commissioner Of Ltd. Income–Tax, 118/120, 3Rd Floor, Ashoka Central Circle–40, Vs. House Zavri Baazar, Mumbai Mumbai-400 002

For Appellant: Shri N.M. Porwal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Dr. Mahesh Akhade, CIT DR
Section 10ASection 153ASection 153BSection 37Section 68

…orized Officer, such searches are invalid and illegal. No search was conducted against the assessee as the premises occupied by the assessee were not entered upon and searched by the Authorized Officer….” 2.16. The ITAT, Bangalore in D T S Rao v. ACIT (2007) 106 ITD 569(Bang. Trib) which was affirmed by Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of (2012) 23 taxmann.com 352(Kar. HC), held as under: “28. In view of Explanation 2 to section 158BE, execution of search warrant is to be inferred from the date recorded in respect of conclusion of search in the last panchnama. Panchnama is not defined in the IT Act. How…

Asst CIT Cir 2, Thane vs. Salasar Developers, Thane

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4513/MUM/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2017AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhan

Section 132Section 132(3)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ, ई, मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “E”, MUMBAI "ी जो"ग"दर "संह, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एन. के. "धान, लेखा सद"य, के सम" Before Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member, and Shri N.K. Pradhan, Accountant Member ITA NOs.4511 to 4513/Mum/2014 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2006-07 ACIT, M/s Salasar Developers, Circle-2, Ground Floor, Vrindavan, बनाम/ Thane Salasar Brijbhoomi, Temba Vs. Hospital Road, Bhayandar(W), Dist:-Thane-401101 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) PAN. No. AAKFS6465R "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee by Shri Virag H. Shah Shri H.N. Singh CIT-DR…

Asst CIT Cir 2, Thane vs. Salasar Developers, Thane

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4512/MUM/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhan

Section 132Section 132(3)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ, ई, मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “E”, MUMBAI "ी जो"ग"दर "संह, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एन. के. "धान, लेखा सद"य, के सम" Before Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member, and Shri N.K. Pradhan, Accountant Member ITA NOs.4511 to 4513/Mum/2014 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2006-07 ACIT, M/s Salasar Developers, Circle-2, Ground Floor, Vrindavan, बनाम/ Thane Salasar Brijbhoomi, Temba Vs. Hospital Road, Bhayandar(W), Dist:-Thane-401101 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) PAN. No. AAKFS6465R "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee by Shri Virag H. Shah Shri H.N. Singh CIT-DR…

Asst CIT Cir 2, Thane vs. Salasar Developers, Thane

The appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 4511/MUM/2014[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Apr 2017AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri N.K. Pradhan

Section 132Section 132(3)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153A

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ, ई, मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES “E”, MUMBAI "ी जो"ग"दर "संह, "या"यक सद"य एवं "ी एन. के. "धान, लेखा सद"य, के सम" Before Shri Joginder Singh, Judicial Member, and Shri N.K. Pradhan, Accountant Member ITA NOs.4511 to 4513/Mum/2014 Assessment Years: 2004-05 to 2006-07 ACIT, M/s Salasar Developers, Circle-2, Ground Floor, Vrindavan, बनाम/ Thane Salasar Brijbhoomi, Temba Vs. Hospital Road, Bhayandar(W), Dist:-Thane-401101 (राज"व /Revenue) ("नधा"रती /Assessee) PAN. No. AAKFS6465R "नधा"रती क" ओर से / Assessee by Shri Virag H. Shah Shri H.N. Singh CIT-DR…

Balaji Universal Tradelink P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 40, Mumbai

The appeals of the assessee are allowed and that of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2183/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Oct 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Sanjay Arora

Section 132(3)Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 153A

…orized Officer, such searches are invalid and illegal. No search was conducted against the assessee as the premises occupied by the assessee were not entered upon and searched by the Authorized Officer….” 2.16. The ITAT, Bangalore in D T S Rao v. ACIT (2007) 106 ITD 569(Bang. Trib) which was affirmed by Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of (2012) 23 taxmann.com 352(Kar. HC), held as under: “28. In view of Explanation 2 to section 158BE, execution of search warrant is to be inferred from the date recorded in respect of conclusion of search in the last panchnama. Panchnama is not defined in the IT Act. How…

Bangalore in D T S Rao v. ACIT (106 ITD 569) — Cited in 5 Judgments | BharatTax