Balvinder Kumar v. PCIT

125 Taxmann.com 83High Court2021#4605 most cited

What is Balvinder Kumar v. PCIT authority for?

An Assessing Officer cannot travel beyond the scope of issues selected for limited scrutiny during the assessment proceedings.

25

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Balvinder Kumar v. PCIT · limited scrutiny · scope of enquiry · assessing officer · section 143(3) · section 263 · revisionary powers · lack of enquiry · erroneous and prejudicial

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Balvinder Kumar v. PCIT

M/S. Mbl A Capital Ltd., Kolkata vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 171/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata27 Jun 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawali.T.A. No.171/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S Mbl A Capital Ltd.………...... .........................................……….……Appellant 3Rd Floor, 135A, Biplabi Rash Behari Basu Road, Kolkata – 1. [Pan:Aaecs4852K] Vs. Pcit-2, Kolkata..……………..….…..…...............……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances By: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Amal Kamat, Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : June 9, 2022 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : June 27, 2022

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA Before Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member I.T.A. No.171/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/s MBL A Capital Ltd.………...... .........................................……….……Appellant 3rd Floor, 135A, Biplabi Rash Behari Basu Road, Kolkata – 1. [PAN:AAECS4852K] vs. PCIT-2, Kolkata..……………..….…..…...............……........……...…..…..Respondent Appearances by: Shri S. K. Tulsiyan, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the appellant. Shri Amal Kamat, CIT-DR, appeared on behalf of the Respondent. Date of concluding the hearing : June…