Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd. v. DCJT

138 ITD 108Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#11085 most cited
9

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Judgments citing Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd. v. DCJT

Ravi Mohan Gehi, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 40, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 6238/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Sept 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 6238/Mum/2016 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Dcit Cen Cir 40, Ravi Mohan Gehi, Piramal Chambers B/6, Navkar Chambers, बिधम/ Mumbai Andheri Kurla Road, Vs. Pin- Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 059 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan No. Aeppg1674M (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant : Shri Pradip Kanasi, Ar By प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondentby : Shri Michael, Dr Virtual Date Of Hearing 29.07.2020 : Date Of Pronouncement 16.09.2020 :

For Appellant: Shri Pradip Kanasi, AR byFor Respondent: Shri Michael, DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 153ASection 234BSection 57

…terest free funds and not loaned funds and, thus no disallowance under section 14A being can be made. The above contention of the appellant is supported by the following decisions; a) Balaram Chini Mills Ltd., 140 TTJ 73 (Kol) [A.Y.2008- 091 b; Mohan Exports, 138 ITD 108 (Delhi) [A.Y.2008-09] Delite Enterp--ise, 135 'TTJ 663(Mum) [A.Y.2003-04] d) BNP Paribas SA, 32 twunann.com 276 (Bombay) (2013) e) GIDC Ltd (Gujarat) 37 taxmann.com 254 (2013) [A.Y.2004-05] f) Reliance Utilities, 313 ITR 340 (Born.) [A.Y.1999-00] g) UTI Bank Ltd. 32 taxrnann.com 370 (Gujarat) (2013) [A.Y.2003-04] h) Jammu & Kashmir Bank Ltd. 33 t…

Shri Shiv Kishan Mohta, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Central Circle - Xxviii, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee on this ground is dismissed

ITA 330/KOL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Feb 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1922/Kol/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2009-2010) Shri Shiv Kishan Mohta(Decd.) Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Represented By L/H Shri Sushil 110 Shantipally, Mohta, Aykar Bhawan Poorva, 9A, Alipore Park Place, Kolkata-700107 South City, Belair, Kolkata-700027 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpm 1971 N .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 330/Kol/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2009-2010) Shri Shiv Kishan Mohta(Decd.) Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-Xxviii Represented By L/H Shri Sushil 18, Rabindra Sarani, 5Th Floor, Poddar Court, Mohta, 9A, Alipore Park Place, Kolkata-700001 South City, Belair, Kolkata-700027 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpm 1971 N .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Shri B.C.Jain, Fca Revenue By : Shri Niraj Kumar, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 07/12/2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 15/02/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2009-10. The Appeal In Ita No.1922/Kol/2012 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 26.11.2012 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata, U/S.263 Of The Act & Appeal In Ita No.330/Kol/2012, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By Ld. Cit(A), Central-1, Kolkata In Appeal No.211/Cc-Xxviii/Cit(A),C-I/10-11, Kolkata, Dated 09.12.2011, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Ao) Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961

For Appellant: Shri B.C.Jain, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 251Section 263Section 263(1)

…ent at 0.5% of the total value. In view of the above and respectfully following the coordinate bench decision in the case of J.K.Investors (Bombay) ltd; supra, we uphold the order of CIT(A). This appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 2. Mohan Exports (P) Ltd, 138 ITD 108(Delhi): “There is no evidence on record to suggest that any investment in shares or units has been made in this year out of borrowed funds on which interest is payable by the assessee. The commissioner (appeals) has given a very specific finding that the examination of free funds available with the assessee…..Therefore, the provision contained i…

Shiw Krishan Mohta., Kolkata vs. C.I.T Central - 1, Kolkata.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1922/KOL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Feb 2017AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi, Jm & Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1922/Kol/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2009-2010) Shri Shiv Kishan Mohta(Decd.) Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Represented By L/H Shri Sushil 110 Shantipally, Mohta, Aykar Bhawan Poorva, 9A, Alipore Park Place, Kolkata-700107 South City, Belair, Kolkata-700027 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpm 1971 N .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 330/Kol/2012 ("नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year:2009-2010) Shri Shiv Kishan Mohta(Decd.) Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-Xxviii Represented By L/H Shri Sushil 18, Rabindra Sarani, 5Th Floor, Poddar Court, Mohta, 9A, Alipore Park Place, Kolkata-700001 South City, Belair, Kolkata-700027 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No.: Afhpm 1971 N .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee By : Shri B.C.Jain, Fca Revenue By : Shri Niraj Kumar, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 07/12/2016 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement 15/02/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: The Captioned Two Appeals Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2009-10. The Appeal In Ita No.1922/Kol/2012 Is Directed Against The Order Dated 26.11.2012 Passed By Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata, U/S.263 Of The Act & Appeal In Ita No.330/Kol/2012, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By Ld. Cit(A), Central-1, Kolkata In Appeal No.211/Cc-Xxviii/Cit(A),C-I/10-11, Kolkata, Dated 09.12.2011, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Ao) Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act 1961

For Appellant: Shri B.C.Jain, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Niraj Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 251Section 263Section 263(1)

…ent at 0.5% of the total value. In view of the above and respectfully following the coordinate bench decision in the case of J.K.Investors (Bombay) ltd; supra, we uphold the order of CIT(A). This appeal of the revenue is dismissed.” 2. Mohan Exports (P) Ltd, 138 ITD 108(Delhi): “There is no evidence on record to suggest that any investment in shares or units has been made in this year out of borrowed funds on which interest is payable by the assessee. The commissioner (appeals) has given a very specific finding that the examination of free funds available with the assessee…..Therefore, the provision contained i…

Balarampur Chini Mills Ltd. v. DCJT (138 ITD 108) — Cited in 9 Judgments | BharatTax