The ADIT (I.T)3(1) vs. M/S. Honkong & Shanghani Banking Corpn. Ltd
In the result, ITA Nos.2519 and 2520/Mum/2004 by revenue stand dismissed, ITA No
ITA 2519/MUM/2004[1999-2000]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Nov 2015AY 1999-2000
Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am & Pawan Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2519 & 2520/Mum/2004 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:1999-2000 & 2000-01) M/S Hongkong & Shanghani Asstt.Direrctor Of Income Tax बनाम/ Banking Corporation Ltd., (International Taxation)-3(1), Vs. 52/60, M G Road, 136, Scindia House, Mumbai-400001 N M Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400038 .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent)
Section 143(3)
…venue in nature. He, therefore, prayed that the claim of the assessee be allowed. In support of his contentions he placed reliance on the following decisions: a) CIT Vs Versus Mohanlal Brother - 1982 133 ITR 642(Bom); b) CIT v Nav Bharat Nirman (P) Ltd [1983] 141 ITR 723 (Delhi). c) CIT v. Auto Distributors: 210 ITR 222 (Cal) The ld. AR further submitted that the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Mohanlal Brother (supra) held that the amount paid for obtaining 19 and other six appeals the possession of premises is business expenditure u/s 37(1) of the Act. In the case of Nav Bharat Nirmal (P) Ltd (supra)…