B.Kubendran v. DCIT

126 Taxmann.com 107High Court2021#5180 most cited

What is B.Kubendran v. DCIT authority for?

A notice under section 143(2) is not mandatory for assessments framed under section 153A/153C, as the Supreme Court's decision in Hotel Blue Moon was specific to block assessments under the erstwhile Chapter XIV-B.

22

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2026.

Also referred to as

B. Kubendran vs. DCIT · section 143(2) · section 153A · section 153C · block assessment · Hotel Blue Moon · natural justice

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing B.Kubendran v. DCIT

Srinivasan Charitable and Educational Trust, Perambalur vs. ACIT, Central Circle-2, Trichy

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and appeal filed by the

ITA 31/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 M/S. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust, No.274-C, Thuraiyur Road, Perambalur-621 212. Tamil Nadu. [Pan: Aagts 1793 N] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) V. The Acit, Central Circle-2, Trichy. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) The Acit, Central Circle-2, Trichy. आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.522/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: 2014-15 V. Srinivasan Charitable & (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) Educational Trust, No.274-C, Thuraiyur Road, Perambalur-621 212. Tamil Nadu. [Pan: Aagts 1793 N] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) Assessee By Mr. G. Baskar, Advocate Department By Mr. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing 22.08.2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 08.11.2024 आदेश / O R Der Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm

Section 12ASection 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, 'ए' न्यायपीठ, चेन्नई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 'A' BENCH: CHENNΑΙ श्री एबी टी. वर्की, न्यायिक सदस्य एवं श्री मनोज कुमार अग्रवाल, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos.28, 29, 30, 31, 55, 56 & 57/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: 2013-14, 2015-16, 2016-17, 2018-19, 2012-13, 2014-15 & 2017-18 M/s. Srinivasan Charitable & Educational Trust, No.274-C, Thuraiyur Road, Perambalur-621 212. Tamil Nadu. [PAN: AAGTS 1793 N] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) v. The ACIT, Central Circle-2, Trichy. (प्रत…

ACIT, Allahabad vs. M/S Sunsine Infrastate Pvt Ttd, Allahabad

In the result, the appeal filed by Revenue in ITA no

ITA 103/ALLD/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad04 May 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2011-12 The Assistant Commissioner Of Sunshine Infraestate Income-Tax, Central Circle, V. Private Limited Allahabad, U.P. 17, Industrial Area, Naini, Allahabad, U.P. Pan: Aancs9247H (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 22/Alld/2017 (Arising Out Of Ita No.103/Alld/2017) Assessment Year: 2011-12 Sunshine Infraestate Private Limited The Assistant 17, Industrial Area, Naini, V. Commissioner Of Allahabad, U.P. Income-Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad, U.P. Pan: Aancs9247H (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Shantanu Dhamija, CIT-DRFor Respondent: Shri Parveen Godbole,CA
Section 132(1)Section 142(1)Section 144Section 153ASection 250

…P a g e | 1 ITA No. 103/Alld/2017 and C.O.No. 22/Alld/2017 (arising out of ITA No. 103/Alld/2017) Assessment Year 2011-12 Sunshine Infraestate Private Limited,Allahabad IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD BENCH “DB”, ALLAHABAD (THROUGH VIRTUAL COURT), BEFORE SHRI.VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2011-12 The Assistant Commissioner of Sunshine Infraestate Income-tax, Central Circle, v. Private Limited Allahabad, U.P. 17, Industrial Area, Naini, Allahabad, U.P. PAN: AANCS9247H (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 22/Alld/2017 (arising out of ITA No.10…

Mbs Jeweller Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-3, Hyderabad

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed in above terms

ITA 331/HYD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad04 Jan 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuassessment Year: 2010-11 Mbs Impex Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Hyderabad. Income-Tax, Central Circle – 3(1), Pan – Aaccm 2968E Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2010-11 Mbs Jeweller Pvt. Ltd., Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Hyderabad. Income-Tax, Central Circle – 3(1), Pan – Aaecm 7050M Hyderabad. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri P. Murali Mohan Rao Revenue By: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 13/12/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 07/01/2022

For Appellant: Shri P. Murali Mohan RaoFor Respondent: Shri Y.V.S.T. Sai, CIT-DR
Section 142Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…even if notice issued u/s 143(2) is time barred or not issued at all or notice u/s 143(2) is invalid in the eye of law, the assessment framed u/s 143(3) will not survive. As held by the Hon’ble High Court of Madras in the case of B. Kubendran Vs. DCIT, [2021] 126 Taxmann.com 107 (Madras.), notice u/s 143(2) is not required to be issued in the cases where assessments framed u/s 153A, but, in the present case, assessment has been framed u/s 143(3), therefore, as per the statute notice u/s 143(2) is mandatory to be issued by the jurisdictional AO, which is absent in this case. Therefore, non-issuance of a valid noti…