Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 147, Section 148, Section 143(3), Section 151, Section 142(1), Section 143(1).

Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd.

Q: How many judgments cite Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd.?

167 judgments on BharatTax cite Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. (161 Taxmann 316), spanning 2015 to 2026.

161 Taxmann 316Supreme Court of India2007#580 most cited

What is Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. authority for?

Reassessment proceedings under Section 147 can be initiated even if only an intimation under Section 143(1) was issued, as such an intimation does not constitute a full assessment. In such cases, the Assessing Officer merely needs to have reason to believe that income has escaped assessment, based on tangible material.

167

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers · Section 147 · Section 148 · Section 143(1) intimation · Section 143(3) assessment · income escaping assessment · reassessment validity · tangible material · reason to believe · distinction between intimation and assessment

Sections most often in play

Section 147 Section 148 Section 143(3)Section 151 Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 69C Section 132

Issues it is cited on

section 147(a)fresh tangible material full and true disclosure section 148(2)section 151(1)mere change of opinion income escaping assessment borrowed satisfaction live link section 151(2)tangible material share capital and share premium

Judgments citing Asstt. CIT v. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd.

Jsk Industries Private Limited, Mumbai vs. DCIT CC-8(1), Mumbai

ITA 5891/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Oct 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Amarjit Singh

Section 147Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “F”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.5891, 5892, 5893, 5894, 5895, 5896 & 5897/M/2019 Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2016-17 M/s. JSK Industries Pvt. Dy. CIT Ltd., Central Circle-8(1), 9 A.K. Naik Marg, Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. Near New Empire M.K. Marg, Cinema, New Marine Lines, CST, Mumbai 400001 Mumbai - 400020 PAN: AABCJ 5937F (Appellant) (Respondent) ITA Nos.6311, 6312, 6313, 6314, 6315 & 6316/M/2019 Assessment Years: 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-1…

DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur vs. Shri Prakash Chand Kothari, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1298/JPR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. B. K. Gupta (PCIT)

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 153C

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES ‘B’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1190/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2011-12 cuke Shri Prakash Chand Kothari DCIT, Vs. B-4A, Kothari House, Prithviraj Road, Central Circle-02, C- Scheme, Jaipur Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AAPBK2884R vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 1298/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2011-12 cuke T…

Shri Prakash Chand Kothari, Jaipur vs. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1190/JPR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

For Appellant: Sh. Rajeev Sogani (CA) &For Respondent: Sh. B. K. Gupta (PCIT)

Section 147Section 148Section 151Section 153C

Sunita Madhok, Bangalore vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(2)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeals by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 555/BANG/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri H.N. Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Smt. H. Kabila, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 234BSection 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos.554 & 555/Bang/2018 Assessment years : 2006-07 & 2007-08 Sunita Madhok, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner L/R of late Sri Romesh Madhok, of Income Tax, # 327, 5th Main Road, 1st Block, Circle 1(2)(1), Koramangala, Bengaluru. Bangalore – 560 004. PAN: ABJPM 9641D APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri H.N. Khincha, CA Respondent by : Smt. H. Kabila, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 23.08.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 11.10.2021 O R D E R Per Ch…

Sunita Madhok, Bangalore vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-1(2)(1), Bangalore

In the result, the appeals by the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 554/BANG/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore11 Oct 2021AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri H.N. Khincha, CAFor Respondent: Smt. H. Kabila, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 234BSection 69

Income Tax Officer, Ward - 3(2)(3), Bangalore vs. Sri Made Gowda Thibbe Gowda, Bangalore

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and CO of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 910/BANG/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Sept 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri H. Guruswamy, ITP & Shri Ravi Kiran, CAFor Respondent: Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Jt. CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 131Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment year : 2008-09 The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Sri Made Gowda Thibbe Gowda, Ward 3(2)(3), No.290, BEML Layout Cross, 1st Phase, V Stage, Bangalore. Rajarajeshwarinagar, Bangalore – 560 098. PAN: AEJPG 5365D APPELLANT RESPONDENT CO No.51/Bang/2019 [in ITA No.910/Bang/2019] Assessment year : 2008-09 Sri Made Gowda Thibbe Gowda, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Bangalore – 560 098. Ward 3(2)(3), PAN: AEJPG 5365D Bangalore. CROSS OBJECTOR RESPONDENT / APPELLANT IN APP…

Dy CIT 15(1)(2), Mumbai vs. M/S Leena Poower Tech Engineers P Ltd., Navi Mumbai

In the result, the appeal is allowed

ITA 1313/MUM/2020[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Us Is A Private Limited Company Stated To Be Engaged In The Business As 'Investment Company' In Column 10, Page 1, Of The Impugned Assessment Order. Its Assessment Under Section 143(3)

Section 143(3)Section 68

…ITA No. 1313/Mum/20 Assessment year: 2011-12 Page 1 of 41 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI ‘A’ BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Vikas Awasthy (Judicial Member)] ITA No. 1313/Mum/20 Assessment year: 2011-12 Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 15(1)(2), Mumbai ……………….………Appellant Vs Leena Power Tech Engineers Pvt Ltd ……………………Respondent 13/14, Sai Chambers, Saroval Vihar Road Sector 11, CBD Belapur, Navi Mumbai 4006 414 [PAN: AAACL4054E] Appearances by Brajendra Kumar for the appellant Devendra Jain for the respondent Date of concluding the hearing: : September 9, 2021 Da…

J.D. Sons Steel Pvt. Ltd., Faridabad vs. ACIT, Faridabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1061/DEL/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Aug 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Dr. B.R.R. Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Umesh Takiyar, Sr.D.R

Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(1)Section 148(2)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “D” NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & Dr. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.1060 & 1061/DEL/2015 Assessment Year 2007-08 & 2009-10 J.D. Sons Steel Pvt. Ltd., v. ACIT, B-17, First Floor, Circle-II, Nehru Ground, NIT, Faridabad. Faridabad. TAN/PAN: AAACJ9814A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Rajesh Jain, CA Respondent by: Shri Umesh Takiyar, Sr.D.R. Date of hearing: 05 07 2021 Date of pronouncement: 31 08 2021 O R D E R PER, AMIT SHUKLA, J.M. The aforesaid appeals have been filed by the assessee against separate impugned ord…

The Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. M/S Fibres and Fabrics International Pvt. Ltd

In the result, we do not find any merit in this

ITA/542/2016HC Karnataka17 Aug 2021

Bench: ALOK ARADHE,HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 260Section 260A

…1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR I.T.A. NO.542 OF 2016 BETWEEN: 1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU 560 095. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-11(3), PRESENT ADDRESS CIRCLE-3(1)(1), 2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA BENGALURU 560 095. ... APPELLANTS (BY MR. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,) AND: M/S. FIBRES AND FABRICS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD., NO.21, E-1, 2ND STAGE PEEN…

Shri Dholumal Alias Dholan Das Khatwani, Jaipur vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-3-2, Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed partly

ITA 533/JPR/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur30 Jun 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 533/Jp/2019 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year :2010-11 Shri Dholumal Alias Dholan Das Cuke I.T.O., Vs. Khatwani, Ward-3(2), 129, Bani Park, Jaipur. Jaipur. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Adrpk 6555 C Appellant Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By: Shri K.L. Moolchandani (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (Jcit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 22/06/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 30/06/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Is The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A)-I, Jaipur Dated 07/03/2019 For The A.Y. 2010-11. The Grounds Taken By The Assessee Are As Under: “1(A) On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case, The Authorities Below Have Erred In Holding The View That The Statutory Notice U/S 147/148 Of The Act Issued In 'Incorrect' Name Is A Valid Notice. The Statutory Notice Issued In Incorrect Name Is Patently An Invalid Notice As Per Provisions Of Law & The Same Deserves To Be Quashed. 1(B) On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Authorities Below Have Factually & Legally Erred In Turning Down The Various Objections Of The Appellant Regarding Initiation Of The Re-Assessment Proceedings U/S 147/148 Of The Act Without Appreciating The Facts Of The Case In Right Perspective & Also Without Addressing The Points At Issue. Thus The Findings Of The Authorities Below In This Regard Are Not Well Reasoned, The Same Deserve To Be Quashed Summarily.

For Appellant: Shri K.L. Moolchandani (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT)

Section 132(4)Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 269SSection 271DSection 3

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES “A”, JAIPUR Jh lanhi x®lkÃa] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 533/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2010-11 Shri Dholumal Alias Dholan Das cuke I.T.O., Vs. Khatwani, Ward-3(2), 129, Bani Park, Jaipur. Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ADRPK 6555 C Appellant Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by: Shri K.L. Moolchandani (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by: Smt. Monisha Choudhary (JCIT) lq…

Shri. Jitendra Virwani, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bangalore

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 47/BANG/2021[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jun 2021AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri S. Ramasubramanian, CAFor Respondent: Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 147Section 234DSection 69

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SMT. BEENA PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA Nos. 46 & 47/Bang/2021 Assessment years : 2002-03 & 2003-04 Shri Jitendra Virwani, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner No.341, Embassy Woods, of Income-tax, 6A, Cunningham Road, Central Circle 1(3), Vasanth Nagar, Bangalore. Bangalore – 560 052. PAN: AAVPV 0738P APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri S. Ramasubramanian, CA Respondent by : Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 16.04.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2021 O R D E R Per…

Shri. Jitendra Virwani, Bangalore vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(3), Bangalore

In the result, both the appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 46/BANG/2021[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore23 Jun 2021AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Smt. Beena Pillai

For Appellant: Shri S. Ramasubramanian, CAFor Respondent: Shri Priyadarshi Mishra, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 147Section 234DSection 69

Dy CIT CC 2 (2), Mumbai vs. Smt. Kalpana Mukesh Ruia, Mumbai

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA 6962/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” Bench, Mumbai Shri Shamim Yahya (AM) & Shri Ramlal Negi (JM) I.T.A. No. 6519/Mum/2019 (Assessment Year 2012-13) I.T.A. No. 6520/Mum/2019 (Assessment Year 2013-14) I.T.A. No. 6521/Mum/2019 (Assessment Year 2014-15) Smt. Kalpana Mukesh Ruia DCIT, CC-2(2) 1102/1103, Express Zone Vs. Old CGO Building A Wing, Patel Vatika Annexe, 8th Floor Off Western Express M.K. Road Highway, Malad-East Mumbai-400 020. Mumbai-400 097. PAN : ASRPR4293B (Appellant) (Respondent) I.T.A. No. 6960/Mum/2019 (Assessment Year 2014-15) Sneha Rajesh Ruia DCIT, CC-2(2) 2202 A, Lakshchandi Vs. Old CGO B…

Kalpna Mukesh Ruia, Mumbai vs. DCIT CC 2 (2), Mumbai

The appeal stands dismissed

ITA 6519/MUM/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai31 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

Neel Builders Pvt Ltd, New Delhi vs. ITO Ward - 18(1), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 6336/DEL/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini

For Appellant: For RevenueFor Respondent: Shri Ved Prakash Mishra, Sr. Dr

Section 132Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES “SMC”: DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.No.6336/Del./2019 Assessment Year 2008-09 Neel Builders Pvt. Ltd. Income Tax Officer, C/o Kapil Goel, Adv. vs. Ward 18(1), F-26/124, Sector-7, New Delhi. Rohini, New Delhi. PAN No. AABCN9572C (Appellant) (Respondent) Shri Kapil Goel, Advocate For Assessee : For Revenue : Shri Ved Prakash Mishra, Sr. Dr Date of Hearing : 23.11.2020 Date of Pronouncement : 02.12.2020 ORDER This appeal by assessee has been directed against the order of Ld. CIT(Appeals)-37, New Delhi dated 28.06.2019 for AY 2008-09…

Shri Arvindbhai Lallubhai Lakhankiya, Surat vs. The ACIT, Circle-9, Surat

ITA 962/AHD/2016[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Surat12 Oct 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh, Hon'Ble & Shri Arjun Lal Saini, Hon'Ble(Virtual Court Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.962/Ahd/2016; "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Arvindbhai Lallubhai V Asst. Commissioner Of Lakhankiya, B-78, Hans Society, S Income Tax, Circle-9, Surat. Varchha Road, Surat. . [Pan: Aadpl 3819 P] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee By Shri Ashwin Parekh – Ar राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue By Mrs. Anupama Singla – Sr.Dr

Section 131Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 50C(3)

…आयकरअपील"यअ"धकरण,सुरत "यायपीठ,सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL : SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, Hon'ble JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ARJUN LAL SAINI, Hon'ble ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Virtual Court Virtual Hearing) आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.962/AHD/2016; "नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2006-07 Shri Arvindbhai Lallubhai V Asst. Commissioner of Lakhankiya, B-78, Hans Society, s Income Tax, Circle-9, Surat. Varchha Road, Surat. . [PAN: AADPL 3819 P] अपीलाथ" / Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रतीक"ओरसे /Assessee by Shri Ashwin Parekh – AR राज"वक"ओरसे /Revenue by Mrs. Anupama Singla – Sr.DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of hearin…

Mr.Hitendra Chunilal Shah, Mumbai vs. ITO Ward 19(1)(5), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4602/MUM/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai17 Sept 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Nishit Gandhi (AR)For Respondent: Shri Bhoopathi (DR)

Section 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “SMC” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2007-08 Shri Hitendra Chunilal shah Income Tax Officer 54, Gulalwadi, Kika Street Vs. Ward – 19(1)(5) Mumbai – 400 004 Matru Mandir Building, 2nd Floor, Nana Chowk, Bhatia Hospital Lane, PAN No. AADPS9581R Grant Road (W) Mumbai – 400 007 Appellant Respondent Assessee by : Shri Nishit Gandhi (AR) Revenue by : Shri Bhoopathi (DR) Last Date of Hearing : 16/07/2020 Date of pronouncement : 17 /09/2020 ORDER PER N.K. PRADHAN, A.M. This is an appeal…

O.P.Yadav, New Delhi vs. DCIT, Central Circ Le-15, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 5523/DEL/2018[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 Sept 2020AY 2000-01

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri O.P. Kant

Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 158B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC-I’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.5523/Del./2018 Assessment Year: 2000-01 Shri O.P. Yadav, Vs. DCIT, D-84, Anand Niketan, Central Circle -15, New Delhi New Delhi. PAN :AAAPY2870L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by Shri Kapil Goel, Adv. Respondent by Ms. Rakhi Vimal, Sr.DR Date of hearing 02.09.2020 Date of pronouncement 10.09.2020 ORDER PER O.P. KANT, AM: This appeal by the assessee is directed against order dated 17/05/2018 passed by the Learned CIT(Appeals)-42, New Delhi [in short ‘…

ITO-20(1)(5), Mumbai vs. Harsha D Shah, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is hereby ordered to be dismissed

ITA 1863/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Aug 2020AY 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Rajeev Harit (DR)

Section 10(38)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(i)Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “H” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VP AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1863/Mum/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) ITO-20(1)(5) बिधम/ Harsha D. Shah R. No.121 1st Floor Piramal 3rd Floor Vincent Chamber Vs. Chambers Lalbaug Parel, 165/A, Dr. B. A. Road, Mumbai-400012. Dadar, Mumbai-400014. स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAQPS7212L (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. Revenue by: Shri Rajeev Harit (DR) Assessee by: Shri Nishit Gandhi सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing: 09/07/2020 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncemen…

Mrs. Renu Tikamdas Tharani, Mumbai vs. DCIT (It)-4(2)(1), Mumbai

ITA 2333/MUM/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Jul 2020AY 2006-07

Section 127Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

…ITA No. 2333/Mum/2018 Assessment year: 2006-07 Page 1 of 55 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI „I‟ BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Amarjit Singh (Judicial Member)] Assessment year: 2006-07 Renu T Tharani ……………….………Appellant 1, Prabhat Building, 28, ‘B’ Road Churchgate, Mumbai 400 020 [PAN: AAXPT 4838 Q] Vs Dy Commissioner of Income Tax International Taxation Circle 4(2)(1), Mumbai ……………………Respondent Appearances by Ved Jain and Mukesh Advani for the appellant Avaneesh Tiwari for the respondent Date of concluding the hearing: : January 28,2020 Date of pronouncement : July 16 ,202…