Asstt. CIT v. Kunwarjeet Finance Pvt. Limited, (2015) 61 Taxmann.com 52 (Ahm,-Trib.), CIT v. Jagdish Narayan Ratan Kumar

61 Taxmann.com 173High Court2015#7486 most cited

What is Asstt. CIT v. Kunwarjeet Finance Pvt. Limited, (2015) 61 Taxmann.com 52 (Ahm,-Trib.), CIT v. Jagdish Narayan Ratan Kumar authority for?

Additions made by the revenue based on a retracted statement recorded under section 132(4) cannot be sustained if the revenue fails to provide any corroborating evidence. Statements made during a search must be correlated with the seized records.

15

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Jagdish Narayan Ratan Kumar · section 132(4) · retracted statement · corroborating evidence · onus of proof · search and seizure

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Asstt. CIT v. Kunwarjeet Finance Pvt. Limited, (2015) 61 Taxmann.com 52 (Ahm,-Trib.), CIT v. Jagdish Narayan Ratan Kumar

Asstt. CIT v. Kunwarjeet Finance Pvt. Limited, (2015) 61 Taxmann.com 52 (Ahm,-Trib.), CIT v. Jagdish Narayan Ratan Kumar (61 Taxmann.com 173) — Cited in 15 Judgments | BharatTax