Arun Gopilal Samnani v. ITO

174 Taxmann.com 33Reported decision2025#13639 most cited
7

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2026.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Arun Gopilal Samnani v. ITO

RAJ KUMAR AGARWAL,SURAT vs. ITO, WARD 2(2)(1), SURAT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 398/SRT/2025[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Surat21 Nov 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.398/Srt/2025 Assessment Year: (2023-24) (Hybrid Hearing) Raj Kumar Agarwal, Vs. Ito, B-303, Megh Malhar Apartment, Ward – 2(2)(1), Near Vidhya Bharti School, Bhatar Surat Road, Surat - 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Abtpa0902D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) Appellant By Shri Suresh K. Kabra, Ca Respondent By Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 15/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 21/11/2025

Section 115BSection 154Section 250Section 250(6)

…IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI BIJAYANANDA PRUSETH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.398/SRT/2025 Assessment Year: (2023-24) (Hybrid hearing) Raj Kumar Agarwal, Vs. ITO, B-303, Megh Malhar Apartment, Ward – 2(2)(1), Near Vidhya Bharti School, Bhatar Surat Road, Surat - 395001 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No: ABTPA0902D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" /Respondent) Appellant by Shri Suresh K. Kabra, CA Respondent by Shri Ajay Uke, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 15/09/2025 Date of Pronouncement 21/11/2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER BIJAYANANDA PRU…

Arun Gopilal Samnani v. ITO (174 Taxmann.com 33) — Cited in 7 Judgments | BharatTax