Wockhardt Limited, Aurangabad vs. Assistamt Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle -3, Aurangabad
In the result, the appeal filed by Revenue is partly allowed, the appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed and the CO filed by assessee is dismissed as withdrawn
ITA 758/PUN/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune10 May 2022AY 2013-14
Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.775/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Acit, Circle-3, Aurangabad .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिधम / V/S. Wockhardt Ltd., R&D Centre, D-4, Midc, Chikalthana, Aurangabad. Pan: Aaacw2472M ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent आयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No.758/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Wockhardt Ltd., R&D Centre, D-4, Midc, Chikalthana, Aurangabad. Pan: Aaacw2472M .......अऩीऱाथी / Appellant बिधम / V/S. Acit, Circle-3, Aurangabad ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Co No.43/Pun/2019 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Wockhardt Ltd., R&D Centre, D-4, Midc, Chikalthana, Aurangabad. Pan: Aaacw2472M .......Cross Objector बिधम / V/S. Acit, Circle-3, Aurangabad ……प्रत्यथी / Respondent Co No.43/Pun/2019
For Appellant: Shri Rajan VoraFor Respondent: Shri Anurag Shivastava
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 35Section 80ISection 92B
…ppeal No.4 and 5 challenges the finding of ld. CIT(A) confirming the disallowance of distribution of freebies to Doctors. This issue is now stands covered against the assessee by the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Apex Laboratories vs. DCIT [442 ITR 1 (SC)]. Accordingly, the grounds of appeal No.4 and 5 stands dismissed. 10. In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. 11. Now, we shall take up the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No.775/PUN/2019. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in both on facts and in law in pas…