ACIT, New Delhi vs. M/S Sbk Trade and Infrastructure Private Limited, New Delhi
ITA 2173/DEL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Nov 2025AY 2015-16
Bench: Shris.Rifaur Rahman & Shri Anubhav Sharmaacit, Cc – 04, Vs. M/S. Sbk Trade & Infrastructure Private Ltd., New Delhi. 211, New Delhi House, 27, Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. (Pan : Aarcs9589C) Co No.110 /Del/2025 (In Ita No.2173/Del/2025) (Assessment Year : 2015-16) M/S. Sbk Trade & Infrastructure Private Ltd., Vs. Acit, Cc – 04, 211, New Delhi House, New Delhi. 27, Barakhamba Road, Connaught Place, New Delhi – 110 001. (Pan : Aarcs9589C) (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Mukesh Jain, Ca Shri Samyak Jain, Advocate Revenue By : Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 29.10.2025 Date Of Order : 14.11.2025 O R D E R Per S.Rifaur Rahman: 1. The Revenue Has Filed Appeal Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Delhi-23 [“Ld. Cit(A)”, For Short] Dated
For Appellant: Shri Mukesh Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ajay Kumar Arora, Sr. DR
Section 148Section 149(1)(b)Section 151Section 151(1)Section 151(2)Section 3
…for completion during the period prescribed under TOLA. (ii) Tata Communications Transformation Services Rajebahadur Madhusudan Trimbak & Ors. vs. ACIT (2022) 443 ITR 49 (Bom.); (iii) JM Financial and Investment Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (2023) 451 ITR 205 (Bom.); (iv) Sidhmicro Equities Private Ltd. vs. DCIT (2023) 453 ITR 33 (Bom); (v) Soumya Girdhari Agrawal vs. ITO – (2023) 457 ITR 636 (Bom.); (vi) Voltas Limited vs. ACIT – 2022 (4) TMI 594 – Bombay High Court. In view of his submissions, ld. AR pleaded that the initiation of reassessment is barred by limitation and thus, the impugned assessmen…