Anil Jaggi v. ACIT
89 Taxmann.com 266Reported decision2018#4617 most cited
What is Anil Jaggi v. ACIT authority for?
Additions made on account of alleged on-money payments for property purchases are invalid if not supported by adequate material, especially when based on seized electronic data without corroboration.
26
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Anil Jaggi v. ACIT · section 69B · on-money · property purchase · seized pen drive · deleted addition · Lakeview developers · validity of addition
Sections most often in play
Issues it is cited on
Judgments citing Anil Jaggi v. ACIT
Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2