Amitabh Bansal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 46(4), New Delhi
102 Taxmann.com 229High Court2019#5916 most cited
What is Amitabh Bansal v. Income Tax Officer, Ward 46(4), New Delhi authority for?
When the revenue relies on the statements of certain individuals to implicate an assessee, the principle of cross-examination must be followed to ascertain the truth, failing which the assessment may be void.
19
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,315 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.
Also referred to as
Amitabh Bansal v. ITO · section 68 · unexplained money · creditworthiness of the creditor · loose papers · cross-examination · natural justice · violation of natural justice · assessment void · statements of third parties