All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT

137 ITD 287Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#51 most cited

What is All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

In non-abated assessments, the Assessing Officer can make additions under section 153A based on books of accounts or documents found during a search but not produced during the original assessment, provided such material is incriminating.

907

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT · section 153A · section 132 · incriminating material · search and seizure · non-abated assessments · books of accounts · documents not produced · original assessment · ITAT Mumbai

Also reported as

18 ITR (Trib) 10618 ITR 106147 TTJ 51316 Taxmann.com 101

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT

DCIT Cen Cir 14, Mumbai vs. Siddhi Twinkle Enterprises, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 2395/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Rajendra & Shri C.N. Prasadआयकर अपील सं /I.Ta No. 2395/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2007-08 The Dcit, M/S. Siddhi Twinkle बनाम/ Central Circle-14, Enterprises, Vs. R.No. 1007, 10Th Floor, 1304, Allmanda Pride Park, Old Cgo Annexe Bldg., Lauukaim Industries, Mumbai-400 020 Thane (W)-400 067 C.O. No. 115/Mum/2015 आयकर अपील सं /I.Ta No. 2395/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/S. Siddhi Twinkle The Dcit, बनाम/ Enterprises, Central Circle-14, Vs. 1304, Allmanda Pride R.No. 1007, 10Th Floor, Park, Old Cgo Annexe Bldg., Lauukaim Industries, Mumbai-400 020 Thane (W)-400 067 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Abafs 6316G (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) .. (""यथ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" ओर से/ Assessee By: Shri Manjunatha Swamy ""यथ" क" ओर से/Department By: Dr. Sunil Pathak Shri Subodh Ratnaparakhi

For Appellant: Shri Manjunatha SwamyFor Respondent: Dr. Sunil Pathak
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 801B(10)Section 801B(10)(a)Section 80I

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, मुंबई "यायपीठ , मुंबई । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E ” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI C.N. PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं /I.TA No. 2395/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2007-08 The DCIT, M/s. Siddhi Twinkle बनाम/ Central Circle-14, Enterprises, Vs. R.No. 1007, 10th Floor, 1304, Allmanda Pride Park, Old CGO Annexe Bldg., Lauukaim Industries, Mumbai-400 020 Thane (W)-400 067 C.O. No. 115/Mum/2015 आयकर अपील सं /I.TA No. 2395/Mum/2013 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2007-08 M/s. Siddhi Twinkle The DCIT, बनाम/ Enterprises, Central Circle-…

ITO, New Delhi vs. M/S. Cantabil Retail India Ltd., New Delhi

In the result, C.O. preferred by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose and the department’s appeal is dismissed as being infructuous

ITA 821/DEL/2012[2009-10 (F.Y. 2008-09)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Sept 2016

Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotra : & Ms. Suchitra Kamble :Asstt. Yr: 2009-10 Income-Tax Officer, Vs. Catabil Retail India Ltd., Ward 49(3), New Delhi. B-47, Ist Floor, Lawrence Road Industrial Area, New Delhi. Pan: Aaack 3901 B C.O. No. 88/Del/2013 ( In Ita No. 821/Del/2012) Asstt. Yr: 2009-10 Catabil Retail India Ltd., Vs. Income-Tax Officer, B-47, Ist Floor, Lawrence Road Ward 49(3), New Delhi. Industrial Area, New Delhi. (Appellant) ( Respondent) Department By : Shri Anil Kumar Sharma Sr. Dr Assessee By : Shri Salil Kapoor Adv.

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor AdvFor Respondent: Shri Anil Kumar Sharma Sr. DR
Section 133ASection 194HSection 201

…as earlier handling the case, the assessee filed the cross-objection. Affidavit has also been filed in support of the condonation petition. Ld. counsel relied on the order of ITAT Mumbai (Special Bench) in the cases of All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. Vs. DCIT 137 ITD 26 (Spl. Bench), wherein in para 7.4.1 of its order the Tribunal has observed as under: “7.4.1 The Ld. Counsel has submitted that this ground could not be raised earlier as the assessee was not properly advised in the proceedings before the lower authorities, and it did not have the services of an advocate at his command. On perusal of record, this…

ACIT CC 22 & 30 Cen RG 5, Mumbai vs. Welspun Syntex Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 5474/MUM/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Jul 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao & Shri C.N. Prasadi.T.A. No.5474/M/2014 (Assessment Year: 2005-2006) फनाभ/ Acit, Cc-22, Welspun House, R.No.404, 4 Th Floor, 9Th Floor, Trade World, B- Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Wing, Kamala Mills Mumbai – 400 020. Compound, S B Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai-13. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aaacw0489L (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) C.O. No.60/M/2016 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.5474/M/2014) (Assessment Year: 2005-2006) फनाभ/ Welspun House, Acit, Cc-22, 9Th Floor, Trade World, B- R.No.404, 4 Th Floor, Vs. Wing, Kamala Mills Compound, Aayakar Bhavan, S B Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai – 400 020. Mumbai-13. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aaacw0489L (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) अऩीराथी की ओय से / Assessee By : Shri Mitesh Shah प्रत्मथी की ओय से/ Revenue By : Mrs. Vidisha Kalra, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri Mitesh ShahFor Respondent: Mrs. Vidisha Kalra, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 153A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI C.N. PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A. No.5474/M/2014 (Assessment Year: 2005-2006) फनाभ/ ACIT, CC-22, Welspun House, R.No.404, 4 th Floor, 9th Floor, Trade World, B- Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, Wing, Kamala Mills Mumbai – 400 020. Compound, S B Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai-13. स्थामी रेखा सं./ PAN : AAACW0489L (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) C.O. No.60/M/2016 (Arising out of I.T.A. No.5474/M/2014) (Assessment Year: 2005-2006) फनाभ/ Welspun House, ACIT, CC-22, 9th Floor, Trade World, B- R.No.40…