All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT

137 ITD 287Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2012#51 most cited

What is All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT authority for?

In non-abated assessments, the Assessing Officer can make additions under section 153A based on books of accounts or documents found during a search but not produced during the original assessment, provided such material is incriminating.

907

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT · section 153A · section 132 · incriminating material · search and seizure · non-abated assessments · books of accounts · documents not produced · original assessment · ITAT Mumbai

Also reported as

18 ITR (Trib) 10618 ITR 106147 TTJ 51316 Taxmann.com 101

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT

DCIT Cen Cir 8(1), Mumbai vs. Ramakant Gaggar, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1290/MUM/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Dec 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.1287 To 1290/Mum/2015 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 To 2009-10) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Shri Ramakant Gaggar Tax- Central Circle-8(1), 302, Gaurav Aprt, Room No.656, 6Th Floor, Gokuldham, Aayakar Bhavan, Goreaon (E), M K Road, Mumbai-400063 Mumbai-400020 अऩीराथी /Appellant प्रत्मथी /Respondent .. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./Pan :Abkpg9952C अऩीराथी की ओय से / Appellant By : Santanu Kr.Saikia प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Respondent By : Shri Vijay Mehta सुनवाई की तायीख /Date Of Hearing : 8.11.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.12.2016 आदेश/O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: These Are Four Appeals Filed By The Revenue & Directed Against The Orders Dated 12.12.2014 For The Assessment Year 2006-07 & Order Dated 02.12.2014 For The Assessment Years 2007-08 To 2009-10 Respectively Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Mumbai. Since These Appeals Are Filed Against The Same Assessee & The Issues Involved Therein Are Common & Therefore For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, These Appeals Were Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Santanu KR.SaikiaFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Mehta
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 254(1)

…s was against the provisions of section 153C of the Act. The ld. AR in defence of his argument heavily relied on the decision in the case of CIT V/s Murli Agro Products Ltd [2014] 49 taxmann.com 172 (Bombay) and All cargo Global Logistics Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2012) 137 ITD 287 (Mum) Special Bench. Finally, the ld. AR submitted that since no incriminating material was found and seized during the course of search proceedings and therefore the addition made by the AO in respect of unsecured loans aggregating to Rs.64 lakhs was without jurisdiction as the assessment in the instant year had attained finality on the date of…

DCIT Cen Cir 8(1), Mumbai vs. Ramakant Gaggar, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1289/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Dec 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.1287 To 1290/Mum/2015 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 To 2009-10) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Shri Ramakant Gaggar Tax- Central Circle-8(1), 302, Gaurav Aprt, Room No.656, 6Th Floor, Gokuldham, Aayakar Bhavan, Goreaon (E), M K Road, Mumbai-400063 Mumbai-400020 अऩीराथी /Appellant प्रत्मथी /Respondent .. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./Pan :Abkpg9952C अऩीराथी की ओय से / Appellant By : Santanu Kr.Saikia प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Respondent By : Shri Vijay Mehta सुनवाई की तायीख /Date Of Hearing : 8.11.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.12.2016 आदेश/O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: These Are Four Appeals Filed By The Revenue & Directed Against The Orders Dated 12.12.2014 For The Assessment Year 2006-07 & Order Dated 02.12.2014 For The Assessment Years 2007-08 To 2009-10 Respectively Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Mumbai. Since These Appeals Are Filed Against The Same Assessee & The Issues Involved Therein Are Common & Therefore For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, These Appeals Were Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Santanu KR.SaikiaFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Mehta
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 254(1)

…s was against the provisions of section 153C of the Act. The ld. AR in defence of his argument heavily relied on the decision in the case of CIT V/s Murli Agro Products Ltd [2014] 49 taxmann.com 172 (Bombay) and All cargo Global Logistics Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2012) 137 ITD 287 (Mum) Special Bench. Finally, the ld. AR submitted that since no incriminating material was found and seized during the course of search proceedings and therefore the addition made by the AO in respect of unsecured loans aggregating to Rs.64 lakhs was without jurisdiction as the assessment in the instant year had attained finality on the date of…

DCIT Cen Cir 8(1), Mumbai vs. Ramakant Gaggar, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1288/MUM/2015[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Dec 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.1287 To 1290/Mum/2015 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 To 2009-10) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Shri Ramakant Gaggar Tax- Central Circle-8(1), 302, Gaurav Aprt, Room No.656, 6Th Floor, Gokuldham, Aayakar Bhavan, Goreaon (E), M K Road, Mumbai-400063 Mumbai-400020 अऩीराथी /Appellant प्रत्मथी /Respondent .. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./Pan :Abkpg9952C अऩीराथी की ओय से / Appellant By : Santanu Kr.Saikia प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Respondent By : Shri Vijay Mehta सुनवाई की तायीख /Date Of Hearing : 8.11.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.12.2016 आदेश/O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: These Are Four Appeals Filed By The Revenue & Directed Against The Orders Dated 12.12.2014 For The Assessment Year 2006-07 & Order Dated 02.12.2014 For The Assessment Years 2007-08 To 2009-10 Respectively Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Mumbai. Since These Appeals Are Filed Against The Same Assessee & The Issues Involved Therein Are Common & Therefore For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, These Appeals Were Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Santanu KR.SaikiaFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Mehta
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 254(1)

…s was against the provisions of section 153C of the Act. The ld. AR in defence of his argument heavily relied on the decision in the case of CIT V/s Murli Agro Products Ltd [2014] 49 taxmann.com 172 (Bombay) and All cargo Global Logistics Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2012) 137 ITD 287 (Mum) Special Bench. Finally, the ld. AR submitted that since no incriminating material was found and seized during the course of search proceedings and therefore the addition made by the AO in respect of unsecured loans aggregating to Rs.64 lakhs was without jurisdiction as the assessment in the instant year had attained finality on the date of…

DCIT Cen Cir 8(1), Mumbai vs. Ramakant Gaggar, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1287/MUM/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Dec 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.1287 To 1290/Mum/2015 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 To 2009-10) Dy. Commissioner Of Income Vs. Shri Ramakant Gaggar Tax- Central Circle-8(1), 302, Gaurav Aprt, Room No.656, 6Th Floor, Gokuldham, Aayakar Bhavan, Goreaon (E), M K Road, Mumbai-400063 Mumbai-400020 अऩीराथी /Appellant प्रत्मथी /Respondent .. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./Pan :Abkpg9952C अऩीराथी की ओय से / Appellant By : Santanu Kr.Saikia प्रत्मथी की ओय से/Respondent By : Shri Vijay Mehta सुनवाई की तायीख /Date Of Hearing : 8.11.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 21.12.2016 आदेश/O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar: These Are Four Appeals Filed By The Revenue & Directed Against The Orders Dated 12.12.2014 For The Assessment Year 2006-07 & Order Dated 02.12.2014 For The Assessment Years 2007-08 To 2009-10 Respectively Passed By The Ld.Cit(A), Mumbai. Since These Appeals Are Filed Against The Same Assessee & The Issues Involved Therein Are Common & Therefore For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity, These Appeals Were Clubbed Together, Heard Together & Are Being Decided By This Consolidated Order.

For Appellant: Santanu KR.SaikiaFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Mehta
Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 153CSection 254(1)

…s was against the provisions of section 153C of the Act. The ld. AR in defence of his argument heavily relied on the decision in the case of CIT V/s Murli Agro Products Ltd [2014] 49 taxmann.com 172 (Bombay) and All cargo Global Logistics Ltd. Vs. DCIT (2012) 137 ITD 287 (Mum) Special Bench. Finally, the ld. AR submitted that since no incriminating material was found and seized during the course of search proceedings and therefore the addition made by the AO in respect of unsecured loans aggregating to Rs.64 lakhs was without jurisdiction as the assessment in the instant year had attained finality on the date of…