Vikram B Tannan, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 3(2), Mumbai
Accordingly the ground No. 1 raised by the assessee is allowed
ITA 5671/MUM/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 Nov 2021AY 2007-08
Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman () & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale () Assessment Year: 2007-08 Mr. Vikram Bodhraj Tanna, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, M/S Capsulation Services Ltd., Vs. Central Circle-20, Capsulations Premises, 1St Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, New Sion Trombay Road, Deonar, Marine Lines Mumbai-400 088. Mumbai-20. Pan No. Aabpt 3016 G Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2007-08 Mr. Vikram Bodhraj Tanna, Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, M/S Capsulation Services Ltd., Vs. Central Circle-3(2), Capsulations Premises, 1St Floor, Room No. 402, Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Sion Trombay Road, Deonar, Road, New Marine Lines Mumbai-400088. Mumbai-20. Pan No. Aabpt 3016 G Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2007-08 Dcit Cc 3(2), Central Range-3, Mr. Vikram Bodhraj Tanna, Room No. 1913, 19Th Floor, Air Vs. M/S Capsulation Services Ltd., India Building, Nariman Point, Capsulations Premises, 1St Floor, Mumbai-400020. Sion Trombay Road, Deonar, Mumbai-400088. Pan No. Aabpt 3016 G Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. J.D. Mistry, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Jacinta, Dr Date Of Hearing : 30/09/2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 25/11/2021
For Appellant: Mr. J.D. Mistry, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Jacinta, DR
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A
…us now examine in detail the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble jurisdictional High court as well as Hon 'ble special bench in the case of Continental ware housing/ All cargo. Pursuant to the judgment of the Special Bench of the ITAT in All Cargo Global Logistics 137 ITD 287 (SB) (Mum) the Bombay High Court considered following two Questions: (i) whether scope of assessment u/s 153A in respect of completed assessments is limited to only undisclosed income and undisclosed assets detected during search and Mr. Vikram Bodhraj Tanna (ii) whether in view of the Circular of the CBDT No. 10/2005 the assessee was entitled to…