Alembic Chemical Works (supra), Commissioner of Income Tax v. Madras Auto Services (supra) and CIT vs. HMT Limited

203 ITR 820High Court1993#2078 most cited

What is Alembic Chemical Works (supra), Commissioner of Income Tax v. Madras Auto Services (supra) and CIT vs. HMT Limited authority for?

Expenditure incurred for the elimination of business competition, such as non-compete fees, is classified as either revenue or capital expenditure based on whether it creates an enduring benefit for the assessee's business.

55

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2012 to 2021.

Also referred to as

CIT vs. HMT Limited · 203 ITR 820 · elimination of competition · non-compete fee · revenue expenditure · capital expenditure · enduring benefit test · business deduction · Section 10(2)(xv) · Section 40A(2) · relinquishment of right

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Alembic Chemical Works (supra), Commissioner of Income Tax v. Madras Auto Services (supra) and CIT vs. HMT Limited