Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

134 Taxmann.com 56Reported decision2022#432 most cited

What is Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT authority for?

The employees' contribution to provident fund (PF) and Employee State Insurance (ESI), if remitted before the due date for filing the income tax return, is an allowable deduction under section 36(1)(va), especially when considering the prospective amendment introduced by the Finance Act, 2021.

208

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,421 Indian tax judgments — from 2021 to 2023.

Also referred to as

Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. · section 36(1)(va) · employees contribution to PF ESI · delayed deposit disallowance · remittance by ITR due date · allowable deduction · Finance Act 2021 amendment · prospective amendment · section 43B

Issues it is cited on

section 158besection 113section 92fclarificatory amendmentretrospective amendmentsection 158bbemployees contribution to pfsection 36(1)(va)section 158bsection 43bsection 158section 2(24)(x)

Judgments citing Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

M/S United Overseas Facilities Management Pvt. Ltd, Chennai vs. ADIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 50/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Marshal Textiles Private Limited, Erode vs. ADIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 5/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos.4 to 6/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Marshal Textiles Private Limited ADIT बनाम/ Pallipalayam Kunnathur, Gobi Main Road, Centralized Processing Center Vs. Getticheviyur, Erode – 638 110. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AABCM-6646-C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" /…

Sri Kumaraguru Mill Limited, Coimbatore vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 45/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

M/S Rane Brake Lining Limited, Chennai vs. ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeals stand partly allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 41/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Saroj Kumar Parida (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43BSection 44A

…1 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपीलसं./ ITA Nos. 101 & 41/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) M/s. Rane Brake Lining Limited ADIT बनाम/ ‘Maithri’,132 Cathedral Road, Centralized Processing Center Vs. Chennai – 600 086. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AADCR-7688-H (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ A…

M/S Sun Tamilnadu Security Management Services P Ltd., Madurai vs. ACIT, CPC, Benguluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 40/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…nd the pre-amended period would be largely guided by the ratio of judicial pronouncements favoring the assessee. 13. We find that this issue has already been settled by co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. V/s ACIT (134 Taxmann.com 56; 08.12.2021). In the said decision, it has already been held by the coordinate bench that the amendment to Sec.36(1)(va) by way of insertion of explanation-2 would operate prospectively only. This view has been taken by the bench considering the ratio of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [201…

Marshal Textiles Private Limited, Erode vs. ADIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 4/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos.4 to 6/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19 & 2019-20) Marshal Textiles Private Limited ADIT बनाम/ Pallipalayam Kunnathur, Gobi Main Road, Centralized Processing Center Vs. Getticheviyur, Erode – 638 110. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AABCM-6646-C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" /…

M/S Sun Tamilnadu Security Management Services P Ltd., Madurai vs. ACIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 39/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…nd the pre-amended period would be largely guided by the ratio of judicial pronouncements favoring the assessee. 13. We find that this issue has already been settled by co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. V/s ACIT (134 Taxmann.com 56; 08.12.2021). In the said decision, it has already been held by the coordinate bench that the amendment to Sec.36(1)(va) by way of insertion of explanation-2 would operate prospectively only. This view has been taken by the bench considering the ratio of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [201…

M/S Sree Lakshmi Venkateswara Spinning Mills (P) Ltd., Palladam vs. DCIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 37/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (CA) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No. 37/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Sree Lakshmi Venkateswara Spinning Mills (P) Ltd बनाम DCIT S.F.No. 2, Karadivavi, Centralized Processing Center / Palladam – 641 664. Vs. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AACCS-7041-L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : S…

Sky Weaves, Tirupur vs. DCIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 31/CHNY/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwant Kumar (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 30/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 31/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Sky Weaves DCIT, CPC बनाम/ 1111/1A-1, Arul Industrial Estate Bengalauru – 560 500 Vs. Tirupur – 641 605 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AATFS-2122-C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent)…

Sky Weaves, Tirupur vs. DCIT, CPC, Benguluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 30/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwant Kumar (CA) – Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 30/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19) & आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 31/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Sky Weaves DCIT, CPC बनाम/ 1111/1A-1, Arul Industrial Estate Bengalauru – 560 500 Vs. Tirupur – 641 605 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AATFS-2122-C (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent)…

Sree Ambal Processors Private Limited, Tirupur vs. ADIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 3/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 2 & 3/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Sree Ambal Processors Private Limited ADIT बनाम/ 28/13, MGR Nagar Centralized Processing Center Vs. Tirupur – 641 602. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAVCS-5557-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant b…

Sharadha Terry Products Private Ltd, Mettuapalaym vs. ACIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 29/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Sharadha Terry Products Private Ltd, Mettupalayam vs. DCIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 28/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Sree Ambal Processors Private Limited, Tirupur vs. ADIT, CPC, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 2/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’ "ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./ ITA Nos. 2 & 3/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2018-19 & 2019-20) Sree Ambal Processors Private Limited ADIT बनाम/ 28/13, MGR Nagar Centralized Processing Center Vs. Tirupur – 641 602. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइ आर सं./PAN/GIR No. AAVCS-5557-J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओरसे/ Appellant b…

Anjapparchettinad Ac Restaurant Madurai LLP, Chennai vs. ACIT, Central Circle 1(3), Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 174/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd., Chennai vs. The Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 17/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20
Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय"ी महावीर िसंह, उपा""एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM No ITA No. AY Assessee Respondent Assessee by 1-2 99/Chny/2022 2017-18 Amazing Export Corporation, DCIT S. Sridhar, 100/Chny/2022 & SF.No: 105, Valayankadu, CPC, Advocate 2018-19 Vadugapalayam PO, Dharapuram Rd., Bangalore. Palladam – 641 664. PAN: AAKFA-0106-D 3-4 88/Chny/2022 2017-18 M/s. Tsugami Precision Engineering India DCIT S. Sridhar, & & P. Ltd.,…

Sky Cotex India Private Limited, Tirupur vs. ADIT, CPC, Bengaluru

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 151/CHNY/2022[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

For Appellant: Shri Yeshwanth Kumar (CA) -Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan (Addl. CIT) – Ld. DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘ए’"ायपीठ चे"ई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय "ी महावीर िसंह, उपा"" एवं माननीय "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल ,लेखा सद" के सम"। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ ITA No. 151/Chny/2022 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2019-20) Sky Cotex India Private Limited ADIT बनाम/ 8/529, Arulpuram, Centralized Processing Center Vs. Karaipudur, Tirupur – 641 606. Bengaluru – 560 500 "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AAKCS-2656-M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Yeshwant…

Venus Rubbers, Coimbatore vs. ADIT, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 147/CHNY/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…nd the pre-amended period would be largely guided by the ratio of judicial pronouncements favoring the assessee. 13. We find that this issue has already been settled by co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. V/s ACIT (134 Taxmann.com 56; 08.12.2021). In the said decision, it has already been held by the coordinate bench that the amendment to Sec.36(1)(va) by way of insertion of explanation-2 would operate prospectively only. This view has been taken by the bench considering the ratio of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [201…

Venus Rubbers, Coimbatore vs. DCIT, Bangalore

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 146/CHNY/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…nd the pre-amended period would be largely guided by the ratio of judicial pronouncements favoring the assessee. 13. We find that this issue has already been settled by co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. V/s ACIT (134 Taxmann.com 56; 08.12.2021). In the said decision, it has already been held by the coordinate bench that the amendment to Sec.36(1)(va) by way of insertion of explanation-2 would operate prospectively only. This view has been taken by the bench considering the ratio of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [201…

Avan Global Solutions Private Limited, Chennai vs. DCIT, CPC/1718/U6/1957321506, Chennai

The appeal stands allowed in terms of our above order

ITA 145/CHNY/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am

Section 139(1)Section 253(4)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

…nd the pre-amended period would be largely guided by the ratio of judicial pronouncements favoring the assessee. 13. We find that this issue has already been settled by co-ordinate bench of this Tribunal in Adyar Anand Bhawan Sweets India Pvt. Ltd. V/s ACIT (134 Taxmann.com 56; 08.12.2021). In the said decision, it has already been held by the coordinate bench that the amendment to Sec.36(1)(va) by way of insertion of explanation-2 would operate prospectively only. This view has been taken by the bench considering the ratio of decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT v. Vatika Township (P.) Ltd. [201…