Addl. CIT v. Smt. Prahati Baruah

111 Taxmann 86High Court2000#9228 most cited
12

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2025.

Judgments citing Addl. CIT v. Smt. Prahati Baruah

Sonia Malik, New Delhi vs. JCIT, Range- 69, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 7792/DEL/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi10 May 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Pandaassessment Year: 2012-13 Sonia Malik, Vs. Jcit, 229, Ground Floor, Range-69, Avtar Enclave, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Anqpm9150J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Pramod Jain, Fca Revenue By : Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 06.05.2019 Date Of Pronouncement : 10.05.2019 Order This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 6Th Septemfebr, 2018 Passed By The Cit(A)-21, New Delhi, Relating To Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The Assessee In Various Grounds Has Challenged The Order Of The Cit(A) In Sustaining The Penalty Of Rs.3,25,000/- Levied By The Jcit U/S 271D Of The It Act.

For Appellant: Shri Pramod Jain, FCAFor Respondent: Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR
Section 269SSection 271DSection 273BSection 54F

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : SMC : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2012-13 Sonia Malik, Vs. JCIT, 229, Ground Floor, Range-69, Avtar Enclave, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi. New Delhi. PAN: ANQPM9150J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Pramod Jain, FCA Revenue by : Shri S.L. Anuragi, Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 06.05.2019 Date of Pronouncement : 10.05.2019 ORDER This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 6th Septemfebr, 2018 passed by the CIT(A)-21, New Delhi, relating to Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The assessee in various grounds h…

Smt Deepika, Bangalore vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Range-5, Bangalore

In the result, appeal by the Assessee is allowed

ITA 561/BANG/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore13 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Shri Jason P Boazi.T. A. No.561/Bang/2017 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Smt. Deepika, C/O M/S. T M Marketing (India), 12, Ground Floor, Tulsi Plaza, S.V. Lane, 3Rd Cross, Chickpet, Bangalore-560 053. …. Appellant. Vs. Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range 5, Bangalore. ….. Respondent. Appellant By : Shri Balram R Rao, Advocate. Respondent By : Smt. Padma Meenkashi, Jcit (D.R) Date Of Hearing : 11.10.2017. Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017. O R D E R Per Shri N.V.Vasudevan, J.M. : This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dt.7.12.2015 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Bangalore-2 For The Assessment Year 2010-11. 2. In This Appeal, The Assessee Has Challenged The Order Of The Cit (Appeals) Whereby The Cit (Appeals) Confirmed The Order Of The Assessing Officer Imposing Penalty On The Assessee Under Section 271D Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short 'The Act').

For Appellant: Shri Balram R Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Padma Meenkashi, JCIT (D.R)
Section 269SSection 271Section 271DSection 273B

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BANGALORE BENCH ‘ B ’ BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JASON P BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T. A. No.561/Bang/2017 (Assessment Year : 2010-11) Smt. Deepika, C/o M/s. T M Marketing (India), 12, Ground Floor, Tulsi Plaza, S.V. Lane, 3rd Cross, Chickpet, Bangalore-560 053. …. Appellant. Vs. Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 5, Bangalore. ….. Respondent. Appellant By : Shri Balram R Rao, Advocate. Respondent By : Smt. Padma Meenkashi, JCIT (D.R) Date of Hearing : 11.10.2017. Date of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017. O R D E R Per Shri N.V.Vasudevan, J.M. : This…

Addl. CIT v. Smt. Prahati Baruah (111 Taxmann 86) — Cited in 12 Judgments | BharatTax