Acumen Fund Advisory Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

50 Taxmann.com 317Reported decision2014#21011 most cited
4

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Judgments citing Acumen Fund Advisory Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT

Sahodhar Reddy Muddasani, Hyderabad vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1(3), Hyderabad

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1619/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad15 Jan 2026AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdiaआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.1619/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17) Shri Sahodhar Reddy Vs. Dy.Cit Muddasani Central Circle 1(3) Hyderabad Hyderabad Pan:Aelpm9122N (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Ca Shri C Maheshwar Reddy राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 06/01/2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 16/01/2026 आदेश/Order Per Madhusudan Sawdia, A.M.: This Appeal Is Filed By Shri Sahodhar Reddy Muddasani (“The Assessee”), Feeling Aggrieved By The Order Passed By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Hyderabad (“Ld. Cit(A)”) Dated 24.09.2025 For The A.Y. 2016-17. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: CA Shri C Maheshwar ReddyFor Respondent: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 153ASection 2(47)Section 2(47)(v)Section 45(1)Section 53A

…ITA No 1619 of 2025 Sahodhar Reddy Muddasani आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘A‘ Bench, Hyderabad "ी "वजय पाल राव, उपा" य" एवं "ी मधुसूदन साव"डया, लेखा सद" य के सम" । Before Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-President A N D Shri Madhusudan Sawdia, Accountant Member आ.अपी.सं /ITA No.1619/Hyd/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17) Shri Sahodhar Reddy Vs. Dy.CIT Muddasani Central Circle 1(3) Hyderabad Hyderabad PAN:AELPM9122N (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee by: CA Shri C Maheshwar Reddy राज" व "ारा/Revenue by: Shri Sankar Pandi P, Sr. DR सुनवाई की ता…

Warburg Pincus India P. Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT 3(3), Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed

ITA 6981/MUM/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Jan 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Rajendra & Shri Saktijit Deyआयकर अपीऱ सं. / Ita No. 6981/Mum./2012 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008–09) Warburg Pincus India Pvt. Ltd. 7Th Floor, Express Towers ……………. Appellant Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 Pan – Aaacw5205E V/S Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle–3(3), Aayakar Bhawan ……………. Respondent 101, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 020

For Appellant: Shri Porus Kaka a/wFor Respondent: Shri N.K. Chand
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ ‘के’ म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K” BENCH, MUMBAI श्री राजेंद्र, ऱेखा सदस्य एवुं श्री शक्तिजीि दे, न्याययक सदस्य के समक्ष BEFORE SHRI RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA no. 6981/Mum./2012 (निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2008–09) Warburg Pincus India Pvt. Ltd. 7th Floor, Express Towers ……………. Appellant Nariman Point, Mumbai 400 021 PAN – AAACW5205E v/s Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle–3(3), Aayakar Bhawan ……………. Respondent 101, M.K. Road, Mumbai 400 020 आयकर अपीऱ सं. / ITA no. 1717/Mum./2014 (निर्धार…

Acumen Fund Advisory Services India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT (50 Taxmann.com 317) — Cited in 4 Judgments | BharatTax