Larsen & Toubro Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cir 2(2), Mumbai
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 6257/MUM/2011[1999-00]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Mar 2018AY 1999-00
Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 1999-00 Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Dcit-2(2) Taxation Department L&T Room No. 577, 5Th Vs. House, N.M. Ballard Estate, Floor, Aayakar Mumbai-400001 Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400020. Pan No. Aaacl0140P Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 1999-00 Dcit-2(2) Larsen & Toubro Ltd. Room No. 577, 5Th Floor, Taxation Department Vs. Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. L&T House, N.M. Road Ballard Estate, Mumbai-400020. Mumbai-400001 Pan No. Aaacl0140P Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Mr. J.D. Mistry & Mr. Madhur Agarwal, Ar Revenue By : Mr. Anadi Varma, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 14/02/2018 Date Of Pronouncement : 28/03/2018
For Appellant: Mr. J.D. Mistry &For Respondent: Mr. Anadi Varma, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 145A
…wn case for the AY 1993-94 dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee. 8.3 Before us, the Ld. counsel of the assessee rely on the decision in Empire Jute Co.’s (SC) [124 ITR 1] Raychem RPG Ltd. (21 taxmann.com 507) (Bom.) (2012), Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. [137 ITD 301], KSB Pumps Ltd. [75 taxmann.com 184] (Bom.) and Asahi India Safety Glass Ltd. (15 taxmann.com 282) (Del.). On the other hand, the Ld. DR supports the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A). 8.4 We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the relevant materials on record. In Raychem RPG Ltd. (supra), it is held that where enterprise resource plannin…