ACIT v. Sh. Ramesh Kumar Mantri

64 Taxmann.com 34Supreme Court of India2015#1472 most cited

What is ACIT v. Sh. Ramesh Kumar Mantri authority for?

Leave to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court in this case. The case concerns reassessment proceedings following a search.

77

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2025.

Also referred to as

ACIT vs. Sh. Ramesh Kumar Mantri · 64 Taxmann.com 34 · Supreme Court · SLP granted · reassessment · search assessment · section 153A · section 132

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ACIT v. Sh. Ramesh Kumar Mantri

DCIT Cen Cir 7(3), Mumbai vs. Madahu Prakash Kapoor, Mumbai

Appeal stands dismissed

ITA 1060/MUM/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Oct 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1060/Mum/2016 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Madhu Prakash Kapoor Income Tax Central Circle 7(3) Pallonji Mansion बनाम/ R.No.655,6Th Floor Flat No.G/D 43 Aaykar Bhavan Cuff Parade Vs. M.K.Road Mumbai – 400 005 Mumbai – 400 020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Agqpk-0792-D (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Anuj Kisnadwala,Ld.ARFor Respondent: Ranjit Singh Arneja, CIT(DR)
Section 132(1)Section 139Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 54

…ITA No.1060/M/2016 Madhu Prakash Kapoor Assessment Year 2010-11 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” "ायपीठ मुंबई म"। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI "ी महावीर िसंह,"ाियक सद" एवं "ी मनोज कुमार अ"वाल, लेखा सद" के सम" । BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, JM AND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 1060/Mum/2016 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Deputy Commissioner Of Madhu Prakash Kapoor Income Tax Central Circle 7(3) Pallonji Mansion बनाम/ R.No.655,6th Floor Flat No.G/D 43 Aaykar Bhavan Cuff Parade Vs. M.K.Road Mumbai – 400 005 Mumbai – 400 020 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. AG…

ACIT, New Delhi vs. Sh. Suresh Jain, New Delhi

In the result, appeals of the department are dismissed

ITA 369/DEL/2012[2000-01]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi28 Apr 2017AY 2000-01

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena Pillai, Jm Ita No. 369/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2000-01 Ita No. 370/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 374/Del/2012 : Asstt. Year : 2006-07 Acit Vs Suresh Jain Circle-38(1), C-29, Panchsheel Enclave New Delhi New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Acxpj6507G Assessee By : Sh. Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Sumit Goyal, Ca Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 14.02.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 28.04.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: These Appeals By The Department Are Directed Against The Separate Orders Each Dated 29.11.2001 Of The Ld. Cit(A)- Xxviii, New Delhi For The Assessment Year 2000-01, 2001-02 & 2006-2007. Since The Appeals Pertain To The Same Assessee, So These Are Being Disposed Off By This Consolidated Order For The Sake Of Convenience & Brevity.

For Appellant: Sh. Sh. Raj Kumar Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR
Section 153A

…CIT [(2016) 75 taxman.com 215 (Kerala) " CIT Vs St. Francis Clay Decor Tiles 385 ITR 624 (Kerala) " CIT Vs Anil Kumar Bhatia 352 ITR 493 (Del.) " Filatex India Ltd Vs CIT 49 taxman.com 465 (Del.) " CIT Vs Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. 64 Taxmann.com 34 (SC) 16. We have considered the submissions of both the parties and carefully gone through the material available on the record. In the present case, it is an admitted fact that the assessee is a respondent in the appeal filed by the department, in the said appeal the issues raised by the department relate to the deletion of various additio…

Ramesh Sumermal Shah, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cir 36, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 414/MUM/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Nov 2016AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey & Shri Rajesh Kumarसर्वश्री सक्तिक्िि डे, न्याययक सदस्य एवुं रािेश कुमार, ऱेखा सदस्य आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.414/Mum/2010 (यनधावरण र्र्व / Assessment Years : 2001-02) Shri Ramesh Sumermal Shah, बनाम/ Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax 220, Commerce House, Circle 36, Vs. 140 N M Road, Fort, 11/43, Ground Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400023 M K Road, Mumbai-400020 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan : Aagps9863H (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. अऩीराथी की ओय से/Appellant By : Shri Nishit Gandhi प्रत्मथी की ओय से/ Respondent By : Shri Prawin Kumar सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing :28.4.2016 घोषणा की तायीख /Date Of Pronouncement :28 .11.2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumarthis Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against Order Dated 13/11/2009 Of Ld. Cit(Appeals)-41 Mumbai For The Assessment Year 2001-02 Passed Against The Assessment Framed By The Ao U/S 143(3) R.W.S. 153A Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Called The Act). 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under:- “On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case He Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Law In Confirming The Addition Of Rs.2,25,00,000/- Made By The Ao On Disbelieving Gift Received By The Appellant”

For Appellant: Shri Nishit GandhiFor Respondent: Shri Prawin Kumar
Section 132Section 139Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ “डी” म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “D” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER सर्वश्री सक्तिक्िि डे, न्याययक सदस्य एवुं रािेश कुमार, ऱेखा सदस्य आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.414/Mum/2010 (यनधावरण र्र्व / Assessment Years : 2001-02) Shri Ramesh Sumermal Shah, बनाम/ Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax 220, Commerce House, Circle 36, Vs. 140 N M Road, Fort, 11/43, Ground Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Mumbai-400023 M K Road, Mumbai-400020 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ PAN : AAGPS9863H (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. अऩीराथ…