ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.

454 ITR 312High Court2023#105 most cited

What is ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co. authority for?

Approval under Section 153D of the Income Tax Act is mandatory for assessment orders in search cases. While elaborate reasons for approval are not required, the approving authority must provide some indication that it has examined the draft orders and found them to meet the requirements of law.

580

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 372,249 Indian tax judgments — from 2023 to 2026.

Also referred to as

ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co. · 454 ITR 312 · Section 153D · approval · mandatory approval · legality of approval · reasons for approval · examination of draft orders · search assessment · income tax

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing ACIT v. Serajuddin & Co.

Melody Enterprises Private Limited, Delhi vs. ACIT Central Circle-13, Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in ITA No

ITA 1349/DEL/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Sept 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.Melody Enterprises Private Vs Acit Limited Central Circle-13 E-2, Kh No. 547, 548, 549, 550, Ara Centre, 551,552, Village Alipur, Jhandewalan Extension, Landmark Near Karan Garden, New Delhi North West Delhi Pan: Aajcm3652Q Appellant Respondent Assessee By None Revenue By Sh. Dheeraj Kumar Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 02/09/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 12/09/2025 Order Per Yogesh Kumar, U.S. Jm: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-28, (‘Ld. Cit(A)’ For Short), New Delhi Dated 28/10/2022 For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. None Appeared For The Assessee. Considering The Issue Involved In The Present Appeal, We Deem It Fit To Decide The Appeal On Hearing The Ld. Department'S Representative & Perusing The Material Available On Record. Melody Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acit

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 153D

…ncerned authority has granted approval for 43 cases in a single day which is evident from the findings of the ITAT, succinctly encapsulated in the order extracted above.” 10. Significantly, the Hon’ble Orissa High Court in the case of ACIT vs Serajuddin& Co. 454 ITR 312 (Orissa) had an occasion to examine substantial question of law on the propriety of approval granted under Section 153D of the Act. The Orissa High Court made wide ranging observations towards the manner and legality of approval under s. 153D of the Act. The Hon’ble High Court inter-alia observed that the approval under s. 153D of the Act bein…