Jm Financial Services Ltd, Mumbai vs. JCIT (OSD) 4(3), Mumbai
Accordingly dismissed. However, in view of our findings given above, the appeal of the assessee is treated as partly allowed
ITA 3654/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Dec 2016AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu & Shri Sanjay Gargassessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. J.M. Financial Services The Joint Commissioner Of Ltd., Income-Tax (Osd)-4(3), (Formerly Jm Financial Room No.635, Services Pvt. Ltd.), Aayakar Bhavan, Vs. 7Th Floor, Cnergy, M.K. Road, Appasaheb Marathe Marg, Mumbai - 400020 Prabhadevi, Mumbai – 400 025 Pan: Aaacj5977A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2009-10
For Appellant: Shri K. Shivaram, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Alok Johri, D.R
Section 14A
…in this regard has also placed on the following decisions: a) CIT v. Taikisha Engg. India Ltd. (2015) 370 ITR 275 (Del) b) I. P. Support Services India (P.) Ltd. (2015) 378 ITR 240 (Del) c) ACIT v. Magarpatta Township Development & Construction Co Ltd. (2015) 152 ITD 469/(2014) 46 taxmann.com 284 (Pune - Trib.). AFL P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2013) 28 ITR (Trib.) 263 (Mumbai) d) 11. The Ld. DR on the other hand has relied upon the findings of the lower authorities. 12. We have considered the rival contentions and gone through record. It may be observed that in the case of ‘Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd.’ 328 ITR 8…